• 제목/요약/키워드: Hangeul Writing Evaluation System

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.02초

글씨쓰기 명료도 평가의 정량적 영상처리 분석 (Quantitative image processing analysis for handwriting legibility evaluation)

  • 김은빈;이초희;김은영;이언석
    • 한국산학기술학회논문지
    • /
    • 제20권7호
    • /
    • pp.158-165
    • /
    • 2019
  • 선수능력의 발달 미흡과 신경학적 손상으로 인해 나타나는 쓰기 장애는 의미전달의 혼동을 줄 수 있고 가독성이 떨어지며 학습, 사회정서 문제 유발 가능성이 높다. 이에 문제 파악과 적시 개입을 위한 평가가 요구되고 있지만 임상에서는 수기에 의한 채점 방식을 채택하며 주관적인 평가에 따른 오류 가능성이 발생한다. 본 연구는 성인의 오프라인 필기체 문자를 영상처리를 통해 글자의 크기비율, 위치를 데이터화 하고 정량화 하며 수기 채점방식과의 비교, 분석을 통해 보다 객관적이고 정확하게 쓰기 수행을 평가하고자 하였다. 2018년 11월 12일부터 16일까지 신경학적 손상이 없는 성인 20명을 채택하여 10단어, 2 문장 자극을 평소 쓰기 습관을 유지한 후 연필을 사용해 따라 쓰며 쓰기 검사 데이터를 수집하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 글씨 측정 알고리즘 결과 단어의 높이가 폭에 비해 1.2배 정도 크고 왼쪽 아래로 치우치는 경향을 보였으며 평균 9mm의 간격을 두고 띄어 썼다. Paired T test를 통한 수기와 본 시스템의 분석결과, 단어 검사와 문장 2의 검사는 고도의 상관관계를 보여 추후 검사 도구로써의 가능성을 보였다. 본 연구는 성인의 오프라인 필기체 문자를 영상처리를 통해 보다 객관적이고 정확하게 쓰기 수행을 평가하였으며 수행 규준을 위한 예비자료를 제공하였다. 향후 다양한 연령대의 쓰기 진단의 기초 자료로 제시될 수 있으며 아동의 경우 쓰기 장애 개입에 깊이 있게 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

일제강점기 '전위미술론'의 전통관 연구 - '문장(文章)' 그룹을 중심으로 (A Study on Avant-Garde Fine Art during the period of Japanese Colonial Rule of Korea, centering on 'Munjang' (a literary magazine))

  • 박계리
    • 미술이론과 현장
    • /
    • 제4호
    • /
    • pp.57-76
    • /
    • 2006
  • From the late 1920s to the 1930s, Korea's fine art community focused on traditional viewpoints as their main topic. The traditional viewpoints were discussed mainly by Korean students studying in Japan, especially oil painters. Such discussions on tradition can be divided into two separate halves, namely the pre- and post-Sino-Japanese War (1937) periods. Before the war, the modernists among Korea's fine art community tried to gain a fuller understanding of contemporary Western modern art, namely, expressionism, futurism, surrealism, and so forth, on the basis of Orientalism, and borrow from these schools' in order to create their own works. Furthermore, proponents of Joseon's avant-garde fine arts and artists of the pro-fine art school triggered debate on the traditional viewpoints. After the Sino-Japanese War, these artists continued to embrace Western modern art on the basis of Orientalism. However, since Western modern fine art was regressing into Oriental fine art during this period, Korean artists did not need to research Western modern fine art, but sought to study Joseon's classics and create Joseon's own avant- garde fine art in a movement led by the Munjang group. This research reviews the traditional view espoused by the Munjang group, which represented the avant-garde fine art movement of the post-war period. Advocating Joseon's own current of avant-garde fine art through the Munjang literary magazine, Gil Jin - seop, Kim Yong-jun and others accepted the Japanese fine art community's methodology for the restoration of classicism, but refused Orientalism as an ideology, and attempted to renew their perception of Joseon tradition. The advocation of the restoration of classicism by Gil Jin-seop and Kim Yong-jun appears to be similar to that of the Yasuda Yojuro-style restoration of classicism. However, Gil Jin-seop and Kim Yong-jun did not seek their sources of classicism from the Three-Kingdoms and Unified Silla periods, which Japan had promoted as a symbol of unity among the Joseon people; instead they sought classicism from the Joseon fine art which the Japanese had criticized as a hotbed of decadence. It was the Joseon period that the Munjang group chose as classicism when Japan was upholding Fascism as a contemporary extremism, and when Hangeul (Korean writing system) was banned from schools. The group highly evaluated literature written in the style of women, especially women's writings on the royal court, as represented by Hanjungnok (A Story of Sorrowful Days). In the area of fine art, the group renewed the evaluation of not only literary paintings, but also of the authentic landscape paintings refused by, and the values of the Chusa school criticized as decadent by, the colonial bureaucratic artists, there by making great progress in promoting the traditional viewpoint. Kim Yong-jun embraced a painting philosophy based on the painting techniques of Sasaeng (sketching), because he paid keen attention to the tradition of literary paintings, authentic landscape paintings and genre paintings. The literary painting theory of the 20th century, which was highly developed, could naturally shed both the colonial historical viewpoint which regarded Joseon fine art as heteronomical, and the traditional viewpoint which regarded Joseon fine art as decadent. As such, the Munjang group was able to embrace the Joseon period as the source of classicism amid the prevalent colonial historical viewpoint, presumably as it had accumulated first-hand experience in appreciating curios of paintings and calligraphic works, instead of taking a logical approach. Kim Yong-jun, in his fine art theory, defined artistic forms as the expression of mind, and noted that such an artistic mind could be attained by the appreciation of nature and life. This is because, for the Munjang group, the experience of appreciating nature and life begins with the appreciation of curios of paintings and calligraphic works. Furthermore, for the members of the Munjang group, who were purists who valued artistic style, the concept of individuality presumably was an engine that protected them from falling into the then totalitarian world view represented by the Nishita philosophy. Such a 20th century literary painting theory espoused by the Munjang group concurred with the contemporary traditional viewpoint spearheaded by Oh Se-chang in the 1910s. This theory had a great influence on South and North Korea's fine art theories and circles through the Fine Art College of Seoul National University and Pyongyang Fine Art School in the wake of Korea's liberation. In this sense, the significance of the theory should be re-evaluated.

  • PDF