• 대한두경부종양학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.133-137
• /
• 2007

갑상선 미세유두암종은 영상 기술의 발달로 더욱 그 빈도가 높아질 것이 예상되므로 진단의 정확도를 높이는 것이 무엇보다 중요하다. 갑상선 미세 유두암종으로 진단 받은 37예를 대상으로 galectin-3, cytokeratin 19와 HBME-1 분자 표지자들을 면역조직화학적 염색을 시행한 결과 cytokeratin 19에서 1예를 제외하고 모든 예에서 갑상선 종양 세포에서 발현하였다. Galectin-3는 갑상선 종양 세포의 세포질에 강하게 염색되었으며 cytokeratin 19는 세포질과 세포막을 따라 강하게 염색되었다. HBME-1은 종양 세포의 세포막에 강하게 염색되었으나 3가지 분자 표지자 모두 정상 갑상선 조직에서는 염색되지 않았다. 이상의 결과에서 볼 때 galectin-3, cytokeratin 19와 HBME-1은 병리조직학적 소견과 함께 갑상선 미세 유두암종을 진단함에 있어 보조적 도움이 되는 표지자로 생각된다.

• 대한병리학회지
• /
• 제52권6호
• /
• pp.404-410
• /
• 2018

Background: Fine-needle aspiration cytology serves as a safe, economical tool in evaluating thyroid nodules. However, about 30% of the samples are categorized as indeterminate. Hence, many immunocytochemistry markers have been studied, but there has not been a single outstanding marker. We studied the efficacy of CD56 with human bone marrow endothelial cell marker-1 (HBME-1) in diagnosis in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) category III. Methods: We reviewed ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples with Papanicolaou stain from July 1 to December 31, 2016 (2,195 cases) and selected TBSRTC category III cases (n=363). Twenty-six cases were histologically confirmed as benign (six cases, 23%) or malignant (20 cases, 77%); we stained 26 LBC slides with HBME-1 and CD56 through the cell transfer method. For evaluation of reactivity of immunocytochemistry, we chose atypical follicular cell clusters. Results: CD56 was not reactive in 18 of 20 cases (90%) of malignant nodules and showed cytoplasmic positivity in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. CD56 showed high sensitivity (90.0%) and relatively low specificity (83.3%) in detecting malignancy (p=.004). HBME-1 was reactive in 17 of 20 cases (85%) of malignant nodules and was not reactive in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. HBME-1 showed slightly lower sensitivity (85.0%) than CD56. The specificity in detecting malignancy by HBME-1 was similar to that of CD56 (83.3%, p=.008). CD56 and HBME-1 tests combined showed lower sensitivity (75.0% vs 90%) and higher specificity (93.8% vs 83.3%) in detecting malignancy compared to using CD56 alone. Conclusions: Using CD56 alone showed relatively low specificity despite high sensitivity for detecting malignancy. Combining CD56 with HBME-1 could increase the specificity. Thus, we suggest that CD56 could be a useful preoperative marker for differential diagnosis of TBSRTC category III samples.