• Korean Journal of Head & Neck Oncology
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.133-137
• /
• 2007

With the wide use of ultrasonography and fine needle aspiration of the thyroid gland, the incidence of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland is rapidly increasing nowadays. To improve the diagnostic accuracy of histopathologic findings of papillary thyroid carcinoma, various molecular markers have been used recently. We analysed the expression of galectin-3, cytokeratin 19 and HBME-1, using immunohistochemical technique in 37 cases of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland to evaluate the diagnostic value of these molecular markers. Immunohistochemically, galectin-3 expression was found in 37 cases of papillary microcarcinoma. Its localization was mostly cytoplasmic. Cytokeratin 19 expression was found in 36 cases. It was mostly localized to the cytoplasm and membrane. HBME-1 expression was found in all cases. Its localization was plasma membrane. The expression of these three molecular markers was negative in the adjacent normal thyroid tissue and accompanying benign lesions, although there are scattered foci of incomplete positive staining in cases of Hashimoto's thyroiditis. Our findings suggest that the immunohistochemical staining using antibodies for galectin-3, cytokeratin 19 and HBME-1 is an useful adjunctive method for the histopathological diagnosis of a papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland.

• Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
• /
• v.52 no.6
• /
• pp.404-410
• /
• 2018

Background: Fine-needle aspiration cytology serves as a safe, economical tool in evaluating thyroid nodules. However, about 30% of the samples are categorized as indeterminate. Hence, many immunocytochemistry markers have been studied, but there has not been a single outstanding marker. We studied the efficacy of CD56 with human bone marrow endothelial cell marker-1 (HBME-1) in diagnosis in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) category III. Methods: We reviewed ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples with Papanicolaou stain from July 1 to December 31, 2016 (2,195 cases) and selected TBSRTC category III cases (n=363). Twenty-six cases were histologically confirmed as benign (six cases, 23%) or malignant (20 cases, 77%); we stained 26 LBC slides with HBME-1 and CD56 through the cell transfer method. For evaluation of reactivity of immunocytochemistry, we chose atypical follicular cell clusters. Results: CD56 was not reactive in 18 of 20 cases (90%) of malignant nodules and showed cytoplasmic positivity in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. CD56 showed high sensitivity (90.0%) and relatively low specificity (83.3%) in detecting malignancy (p=.004). HBME-1 was reactive in 17 of 20 cases (85%) of malignant nodules and was not reactive in five of six cases (83%) of benign nodules. HBME-1 showed slightly lower sensitivity (85.0%) than CD56. The specificity in detecting malignancy by HBME-1 was similar to that of CD56 (83.3%, p=.008). CD56 and HBME-1 tests combined showed lower sensitivity (75.0% vs 90%) and higher specificity (93.8% vs 83.3%) in detecting malignancy compared to using CD56 alone. Conclusions: Using CD56 alone showed relatively low specificity despite high sensitivity for detecting malignancy. Combining CD56 with HBME-1 could increase the specificity. Thus, we suggest that CD56 could be a useful preoperative marker for differential diagnosis of TBSRTC category III samples.