• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Safety Conference
• /
• 1998.11a
• /
• pp.125-130
• /
• 1998

현 산업체에서는 사고를 미연에 방지하기 위해 다양한 위험성 평가기법을 이용하고 있다. 위험과 운전성 분석기법(HAZOP)은 대표적인 정성적 평가기법으로 체계적인 연구가 가능하며 brain-storming에 의한 폭넓은 평가 결과를 얻을 수 있으므로 화학 공장에서 널리 사용된다. 그러나 HAZOP Analysis는 여러 분야의 전문가들이 위험성 평가를 시행하여야 하기 때문에 상당한 비용과 노력, 시간이 필요하고 전문가의 자질과 컨디션이 결과에 영향을 미치므로 객관적인 신뢰도가 떨어지는 단점이 있다. 이러한 문제점을 해결하고자 하는 노력으로 HAZOP Analysis 자동화를 위한 연구가 지금까지 활발히 전개되었으나 대부분이 연속 공정에 국한된 것이었다. (중략)

• Journal of the Korean Professional Engineers Association
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.19-28
• /
• 1996

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.10a
• /
• pp.655-657
• /
• 2004

본 논문은 안전등급 제어 기 기(Programmable Logic Controller) 에서 동작하는 실시간 운영체제의 안전성을 요구사항 단계에서 평가할 수 있는 검토항목을 개발하고 HAZOP(Hazard and Operability) 을 이용하여 현재 개발중인 PLC 운영체제에 적용한 경험 을 기술한다. HAZOP은 화학공장과 같은 산업에서 안전성을 평가하기 위한 방법으로 사용했던 방법론이다. 원자력발전소에 적용하기 위해 운영체제가 갖추어야 할 안전성 요건은 NUREG-0800의 BTP-14(Branch Technical Position)의 소프트웨어 기능특성 및 공정특성에 기술되어 있다. 이러한 기능적인 특성을 정확도, 신뢰성, 타이밍/사이징, 기능성, 강인성, 보안성 항목으로 나누고 세부적인 검토리스트를 만들어 HAZOP을 적용하여 평가하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.87.2-87.2
• /
• 2003

• Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.35-42
• /
• 2017

Process Hazard Analysis(PHA) have been performed for a risk management of process (petrochemical) industry for nearly 50 years. There are many PHA methods for application in the process industry, Hazop Study method has been recognized as a good method used typically in most of phase of process plant. And also there was inconvenient opinion that Hazop Study is too resource (man power, time etc.) consuming comparing its result performance (a quality of recommendations) for a good operating and existing plant. In this study, two types of PHA method - checklist and K-PSR - were performed respectively for a new para-xylene(PX)plant and 30 year old PX plant. Past history and experience of incident, operation, maintenance and so on are very important in PHA by those two methods. The higher effectiveness were realized in PHA by a checklist and K-PSR Method than prior Hazop study. And also some suggestions including PHA cycle determination, RBPS application, Follow-up plan of PHA result etc. were proposed about PHA improvement measures for a best risk management.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.48-57
• /
• 1999

Safe plants are maintained by the systematic identification of potential hazards. Various hazard evaluation methods have been developed in pursuit of safe plants. Recently, much efforts has been made for the automation of hazard evaluation system by introducing expert system to get rid of weak points of the conventional hazard evaluation methods. HAZOP study is recognized as one of the most systematic and logical hazard evaluation methods. However, it has several disadvantages; experts should participate simultaneously, the detailed study is time-consuming, and the quality of the results largely depends on the quality of the experts. Therefore, the automation of HAZOP Study is highly beneficial for reducing the required time and obtaining the consistent evaluation results. In this study, a framework for the automation of HAZOP study is suggested. Based on the suggested framework, HAxSYM, an expert system to automate HAZOP study, has been developed. The case study validates the performance of the developed system, and the results are compared with the results from the conventional HAZOP study.

• Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
• /
• v.3 no.4
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2001

Cost-benefit analysis was investigated to propose the analysis method of the effect of investment and the optimum investment level of safety management cost for preventing gas accident in the B governor station. From five classifications of safety management costs consisting of cost items with similar characters and potential accident costs calculated by risk assessments(FMEA/HAZOP), we found that the order of the benefit(the reduction cost of the potential accident cost) was the instrument increase and repair cost > the safety checking and inspection cost > the labor and training cost > the safety equipment and corresponding cost > the research and development cost. As the benefit was increased with increasing the investment cost, the effect of investment was increased with decreasing the Investment cost. As a result, the optimum safety management cost was estimated and the investment level was analyzed by the model of optimum investment level.

• Transactions of the Korean hydrogen and new energy society
• /
• v.32 no.5
• /
• pp.299-307
• /
• 2021

In order to expand the supply of hydrogen vehicles, the first thing to be done is to build an infrastructure to supply hydrogen. There are fixed and mobile types of hydrogen refueling stations that can supply hydrogen. Mobile hydrogen refueling stations have the advantage of supplying hydrogen to two or three areas, so the introduction of mobile hydrogen refueling stations is considered at the initial stage of hydrogen vehicle dissemination. However, mobile hydrogen refueling stations have greater risks than fixed hydrogen refueling stations due to the hazard associated with movement and intensive installation of facilities in vehicle, so stricter design standards to lower the risk must be applied. Therefore, in this study, basic data for establishing safety standards for mobile hydrogen refueling stations were proposed by suggesting improvements such as the location of emergency shutoff valves, the number of gas detectors etc., using HAZOP analysis.

• 한국가스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1997.09a
• /
• pp.138-141
• /
• 1997

• 한국가스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.230-230
• /
• 2005