• Title/Summary/Keyword: Grout bulb

Search Result 12, Processing Time 0.02 seconds

Laboratory Test for the Performance of Grouting under Hydrostatic Pressure (정수압을 고려한 그라우팅의 성능에 대한 실험적 연구)

  • Jun, Kyoung-Jea;Oh, Myounghak;Yune, Chan-Young
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.33 no.10
    • /
    • pp.49-58
    • /
    • 2017
  • Grouting for soil improvement has generally been applied to the depth over water table. Recently, it is needed to develop the grouting technique for soils under greater static water pressure or greater overburden pressure in constructions such as deep excavation or harbour deepening. In this study, a laboratory apparatus was developed to control the injection pressure, load pressure, and hydrostatic pressure. A series of experiments were performed with various degrees of hydrostatic pressure using the developed equipment. As a result, injected volume increase as injection pressure increase, while the volume significantly decreased under hydrostatic pressure. Larger volume of grout bulb was shown in soils with larger granular and pore size based on the comparison result of volume changes with respect to the amount of grouting injection.

A Study on the Grouting Characteristics of Top-down Multi-step Pressure Grouting Method (하향식 다단 압력 그라우팅 방법의 주입특성에 대한 연구)

  • Lee, Hongsung;Lee, Seungho
    • The Journal of Engineering Geology
    • /
    • v.29 no.3
    • /
    • pp.201-209
    • /
    • 2019
  • Bottom-up multi-stage pressure grouting is widely applied to domestic slopes and tunnels. It involves injecting earth from the ground to the surface after drilling. Various reports of construction performance have demonstrated its wide applicability. However, little research has studied top-down multi-step pressure grouting in Korea, which involves injection from the surface. This paper compares the grouting effect of both the established bottom-up method and the top-down method in soil box and field tests. The soil box test showed that the bulb volume of the top-down method is ~24% less than that of the bottom-up method. The field test confirmed that the top-down method has a wider grouting range and a higher injection density per area than the bottom-up method.