최근 전 세계 보험업계에도 기계학습, 자연어 처리, 딥러닝 등의 인공지능 기술 활용을 통한 디지털 전환이 급속도로 확산하고 있다. 이에 따라 인공지능 기술을 기반으로 한 인슈어테크와 플랫폼 비즈니스 성공을 이룬 해외 보험사들도 증가하고 있다. 대표적으로 중국 최대 민영기업인 평안보험그룹은 '금융과 기술', '금융과 생태계'를 기업의 핵심 키워드로 내세우며 끊임없는 혁신에 도전한 결과, 인슈어테크와 디지털플랫폼 분야에서 괄목할만한 성과를 보이며 중국의 글로벌 4차 산업혁명을 선도하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 평안보험그룹 인슈어테크와 플랫폼 비즈니스 활동을 ser-M 분석 모델을 통해 분석하여 국내 보험사들의 인공지능 기술기반 비즈니스 활성화를 위한 전략적 시사점을 제공하고자 했다. ser-M 분석 모델은 기업의 경영전략을 주체, 환경, 자원, 메커니즘 관점에서 통합적으로 해석이 가능한 프레임으로, 최고경영자의 비전과 리더십, 기업의 역사적 환경, 다양한 자원 활용, 독특한 메커니즘 관계가 통합적으로 해석되도록 연구하였다. 사례분석 결과, 평안보험은 안면·음성·표정 인식 등 핵심 인공지능 기술을 활용하여 세일즈, 보험인수, 보험금 청구, 대출 서비스 등 업무 전 영역을 디지털로 혁신함으로써 경비 절감과 고객서비스 발전을 이루었다. 또한 '중국 내 온라인 데이터'와 '회사가 축적한 방대한 오프라인 데이터 및 통찰력'을 인공지능, 빅데이터 분석 등 신기술과 결합하여 금융 서비스와 디지털 서비스 사업이 통합된 디지털 플랫폼을 구축하였다. 이러한 평안보험그룹의 성공 배경을 ser-M 관점에서 분석해 보면, 창업자 마밍즈 회장은 4차 산업혁명 시대의 디지털 기술발전, 시장경쟁 및 인구 구조의 변화를 빠르게 포착하여 새로운 비전을 수립하고 디지털 기술중시의 민첩한 리더십을 발휘하였다. 환경변화에 대응한 창업자 주도의 강력한 리더십을 바탕으로 인공지능 기술 투자, 우수 전문인력 확보, 빅데이터 역량 강화 등 내부자원을 혁신하고, 외부 흡수역량의 결합, 다양한 업종 간의 전략적 제휴를 통해 인슈어테크와 플랫폼 비즈니스를 성공적으로 끌어냈다. 이와 같은 성공사례 분석을 통하여 인슈어테크와 디지털플랫폼 도입을 본격 준비하고 있는 국내 보험사들에게 디지털 시대에 필요한 경영 전략과 리더십에 대한 시사점을 줄 수 있다.
Just before the Korean War, the total number of the North Korean troops was 198,380, while that of the ROK(Republic of Korea) army troops 105,752. That is, the total number of the ROK army troops at that time was 53.3% of the total number of the North Korean army. As of December 2008, the total number of the North Korean troops is estimated to be 1,190,000, while that of the ROK troops is 655,000, so the ROK army maintains 55.04% of the total number of the North Korean troops. If the ROK army continues to reduce its troops according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the total number of its troops will be 517,000 m 2020. If North Korea maintains the current status(l,190,000 troops), the number of the ROK troops will be 43.4% of the North Korean army. In terms of units, just before the Korean War, the number of the ROK army divisions and regiments was 80% and 44.8% of North Korean army. As of December 2008, North Korea maintains 86 divisions and 69 regiments. Compared to the North Korean army, the ROK army maintains 46 Divisions (53.4% of North Korean army) and 15 regiments (21.3% of North Korean army). If the ROK army continue to reduce the military units according to [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of ROK army divisions will be 28(13 Active Division, 4 Mobilization Divisions and 11 Local Reserve Divisions), while that of the North Korean army will be 86 in 2020. In that case, the number of divisions of the ROK army will be 32.5% of North Korean army. During the Korean war, North Korea suddenly invaded the Republic of Korea and occupied its capital 3 days after the war began. At that time, the ROK army maintained 80% of army divisions, compared to the North Korean army. The lesson to be learned from this is that, if the ROK army is forced to disperse its divisions because of the simultaneous invasion of North Korea and attack of guerrillas in home front areas, the Republic of Korea can be in a serious military danger, even though it maintains 80% of military divisions of North Korea. If the ROK army promotes the plans in [Military Reform Plan 2020], the number of military units of the ROK army will be 32.5% of that of the North Korean army. This ratio is 2.4 times lower than that of the time when the Korean war began, and in this case, 90% of total military power should be placed in the DMZ area. If 90% of military power is placed in the DMZ area, few troops will be left for the defense of home front. In addition, if the ROK army continues to reduce the troops, it can allow North Korea to have asymmetrical superiority in military force and it will eventually exert negative influence on the stability and peace of the Korean peninsular. On the other hand, it should be reminded that, during the Korean War, the Republic of Korea was attacked by North Korea, though it kept 53.3% of troops, compared to North Korea. It should also be reminded that, as of 2008, the ROK army is defending its territory with the troops 55.04% of North Korea. Moreover, the national defense is assisted by 25,120 troops of the US Forces in Korea. In case the total number of the ROK troops falls below 43.4% of the North Korean army, it may cause social unrest about the national security and may lead North Korea's misjudgement. Besides, according to Lanchester strategy, the party with weaker military power (60% compared to the party with stronger military power) has the 4.1% of winning possibility. Therefore, if we consider the fact that the total number of the ROK army troops is 55.04% of that of the North Korean army, the winning possibility of the ROK army is not higher than 4.1%. If the total number of ROK troops is reduced to 43.4% of that of North Korea, the winning possibility will be lower and the military operations will be in critically difficult situation. [Military Reform Plan 2020] rums at the reduction of troops and units of the ground forces under the policy of 'select few'. However, the problem is that the financial support to achieve this goal is not secured. Therefore, the promotion of [Military Reform Plan 2020] may cause the weakening of military defence power in 2020. Some advanced countries such as Japan, UK, Germany, and France have promoted the policy of 'select few'. However, what is to be noted is that the national security situation of those countries is much different from that of Korea. With the collapse of the Soviet Unions and European communist countries, the military threat of those European advanced countries has almost disappeared. In addition, the threats those advanced countries are facing are not wars in national level, but terrorism in international level. To cope with the threats like terrorism, large scaled army trops would not be necessary. So those advanced European countries can promote the policy of 'select few'. In line with this, those European countries put their focuses on the development of military sections that deal with non-military operations and protection from unspecified enemies. That is, those countries are promoting the policy of 'select few', because they found that the policy is suitable for their national security environment. Moreover, since they are pursuing common interest under the European Union(EU) and they can form an allied force under NATO, it is natural that they are pursing the 'select few' policy. At present, NATO maintains the larger number of troops(2,446,000) than Russia(l,027,000) to prepare for the potential threat of Russia. The situation of japan is also much different from that of Korea. As a country composed of islands, its prime military focus is put on the maritime defense. Accordingly, the development of ground force is given secondary focus. The japanese government promotes the policy to develop technology-concentrated small size navy and air-forces, instead of maintaining large-scaled ground force. In addition, because of the 'Peace Constitution' that was enacted just after the end of World War II, japan cannot maintain troops more than 240,000. With the limited number of troops (240,000), japan has no choice but to promote the policy of 'select few'. However, the situation of Korea is much different from the situations of those countries. The Republic of Korea is facing the threat of the North Korean Army that aims at keeping a large-scale military force. In addition, the countries surrounding Korea are also super powers containing strong military forces. Therefore, to cope with the actual threat of present and unspecified threat of future, the importance of maintaining a carefully calculated large-scale military force cannot be denied. Furthermore, when considering the fact that Korea is in a peninsular, the Republic of Korea must take it into consideration the tradition of continental countries' to maintain large-scale military powers. Since the Korean War, the ROK army has developed the technology-force combined military system, maintaining proper number of troops and units and pursuing 'select few' policy at the same time. This has been promoted with the consideration of military situation in the Koran peninsular and the cooperation of ROK-US combined forces. This kind of unique military system that cannot be found in other countries can be said to be an insightful one for the preparation for the actual threat of North Korea and the conflicts between continental countries and maritime countries. In addition, this kind of technology-force combined military system has enabled us to keep peace in Korea. Therefore, it would be desirable to maintain this technology-force combined military system until the reunification of the Korean peninsular. Furthermore, it is to be pointed out that blindly following the 'select few' policy of advanced countries is not a good option, because it is ignoring the military strategic situation of the Korean peninsular. If the Republic of Korea pursues the reduction of troops and units radically without consideration of the threat of North Korea and surrounding countries, it could be a significant strategic mistake. In addition, the ROK army should keep an eye on the fact the European advanced countries and Japan that are not facing direct military threats are spending more defense expenditures than Korea. If the ROK army reduces military power without proper alternatives, it would exert a negative effect on the stable economic development of Korea and peaceful reunification of the Korean peninsular. Therefore, the desirable option would be to focus on the development of quality of forces, maintaining proper size and number of troops and units under the technology-force combined military system. The tableau above shows that the advanced countries like the UK, Germany, Italy, and Austria spend more defense expenditure per person than the Republic of Korea, although they do not face actual military threats, and that they keep achieving better economic progress than the countries that spend less defense expenditure. Therefore, it would be necessary to adopt the merits of the defense systems of those advanced countries. As we have examined, it would be desirable to maintain the current size and number of troops and units, to promote 'select few' policy with increased defense expenditure, and to strengthen the technology-force combined military system. On the basis of firm national security, the Republic of Korea can develop efficient policies for reunification and prosperity, and jump into the status of advanced countries. Therefore, the plans to reduce troops and units in [Military Reform Plan 2020] should be reexamined. If it is difficult for the ROK army to maintain its size of 655,000 troops because of low birth rate, the plans to establish the prompt mobilization force or to adopt drafting system should be considered for the maintenance of proper number of troops and units. From now on, the Republic of Korean government should develop plans to keep peace as well as to prepare unexpected changes in the Korean peninsular. For the achievement of these missions, some options can be considered. The first one is to maintain the same size of military troops and units as North Korea. The second one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea in terms of military force index. The third one is to maintain the same level of military power as North Korea, with the combination of the prompt mobilization force and the troops in active service under the system of technology-force combined military system. At present, it would be not possible for the ROK army to maintain such a large-size military force as North Korea (1,190,000 troops and 86 units). So it would be rational to maintain almost the same level of military force as North Korea with the combination of the troops on the active list and the prompt mobilization forces. In other words, with the combination of the troops in active service (60%) and the prompt mobilization force (40%), the ROK army should develop the strategies to harmonize technology and forces. The Korean government should also be prepared for the strategic flexibility of USFK, the possibility of American policy change about the location of foreign army, radical unexpected changes in North Korea, the emergence of potential threat, surrounding countries' demand for Korean force for the maintenance of regional stability, and demand for international cooperation against terrorism. For this, it is necessary to develop new approaches toward the proper number and size of troops and units. For instance, to prepare for radical unexpected political or military changes in North Korea, the Republic of Korea should have plans to protect a large number of refugees, to control arms and people, to maintain social security, and to keep orders in North Korea. From the experiences of other countries, it is estimated that 115,000 to 230,000 troops, plus ten thousands of police are required to stabilize the North Korean society, in the case radical unexpected military or political change happens in North Korea. In addition, if the Republic of Korea should perform the release of hostages, control of mass destruction weapons, and suppress the internal wars in North Korea, it should send 460,000 troops to North Korea. Moreover, if the Republic of Korea wants to stop the attack of North Korea and flow of refugees in DMZ area, at least 600,000 troops would be required. In sum, even if the ROK army maintains 600,000 troops, it may need additional 460,000 troops to prepare for unexpected radical changes in North Korea. For this, it is necessary to establish the prompt mobilization force whose size and number are almost the same as the troops in active service. In case the ROK army keeps 650,000 troops, the proper number of the prompt mobilization force would be 460,000 to 500,000.
보건소 조직구조에 대한 인식도 점수는 5 점척도 기준으로 재량권 필요성에 대한 인식도가 3.55 점으로 가장 높았고 보건소 조직구조에 대한 일반적 인식이 3.06점, 업무분장의 적합성 3.05점, 인력ㆍ예산의 적정성이 2.93 점, 의사결정권 소재에 대한 인식이 2.77 점 순이었다. 보건소 조직구조에 대한 직원들의 일반적 인식도 점수는 중소도시에서, 50 대 이상에서, 고졸 이하에서, 6급이상에서, 공무원 근무경력이 20년이상에서, 현부서 근무기간이 2년이하에서, 월평균 보수가 181만원이상에서 각각 타 군보다 높았으며 이들 변수들은 유의한 관련성이 있었다 그리고 의사결정권 소재에 대한 인식도 점수는 대도시에서, 남자에서, 기혼자에서, 6급이상자에서, 보건ㆍ행정직에서, 월평균 보수가 131-180 만원에서 각각 타 군보다 높았으며 이들 변수들은 유의한 관련성이 있었다. 재량권 필요성에 대한 인식도 점수는 20 대에서, 미혼자에서, 대졸이상자에서, 간호직에서, 공무원 근무경력이 5년이하자에서, 현부서 근무기간이 2년 이하자에서, 월평균 보수가 80 만원 이하자에서 각각 타 군보다 높았다. 인력ㆍ예산 적정성에 대한 인식도 점수는 여자에서,30 대에서, 기혼자에서,8 급에서, 보건ㆍ행정직에서, 현부서 근무기간 2-4년인자에서 각각 타 군보다 높았다. 그리고 업무분장의 적합성에 대한 인식도 점수는 중소도시에서, 기혼자에서, 의료기술직에서, 공무원 근무경력이 20 년이상자에서, 현부서 근무기간이 4년이하자에서 각각 타 군보다 높았으며 이틀 변수들은 유의한 관련성이 있었다, 보건소 직원들의 보건소 조직관리에 대한 인식도 조사에서 의사결정시 의견반응에 관한 인식도가 2.92 점으로 가장 높았으며, 목표량 설정방법의 합리성에 관한 인식이 2.88점, 보건소 인사관리에 대한 인식이 2.63점이었다. 보건소 인사관리에 대한 인식도 점수는 중소도시에서, 40대에서, 6급 이상자에서, 의료기술직에서, 공무원 근무경력이 20년 이상자에서, 현부서 근무기간이 2년 이하자에서, 월평균 보수가 181만원 이상자에서 각각 타 군보다 높았으며 이들 변수들은 유의한 관련성이 있었다. 의사결정시 의견반응에 관한 인식도 점수는 중소도시에서, 여자에서, 8급에서, 보건ㆍ행정직에서, 현부서 근무기간 2 년 이하자에서 각각 타 군보다 높았으며, 목표량 설정방법의 합리성에 관한 인식도 점수는 50대 이상에서, 고졸 이하자에서,6 급 이상 자에서, 의무직에서, 공무원 근무경력 15-20 년인 자에서 각각 타 군보다 높았으며 이들 변수들은 유의한 관련성이 있었다. 직무만족도에 유의하게 영향을 미치는 요인은 성, 교육정도, 업무분장의 적합성, 목표량 설정방법의 합리성에 관한 인식, 동기요인, 위생요인 이었으며, 조직문화에 유의하게 영향을 미치는 요인은 연령, 공무원 근무경력, 현부서 근무기간, 보건소 인력ㆍ예산의 적정성에 대한 인식, 업무분장의 적합성, 의사결정시 의견반응에 관한 인식, 목표량 설정방법의 합리성에 관한 인식이었다.