• Title/Summary/Keyword: GnRH-analogue

Search Result 23, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Cotreatment with Growth Hormone in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation for IVF in Women with Limited Ovarian Reserve (체외수정시술을 위한 성선자극호르몬 과배란유도에 Limited Ovarian Reserve를 갖는 환자에서 성장호르몬의 사용)

  • Kim, Sun-Haeng;Chang, Ki-Hoon;Ku, Pyoung-Sahm
    • Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
    • /
    • v.21 no.3
    • /
    • pp.241-245
    • /
    • 1994
  • Despite increasing success rate of IVF, poor response to ovarian stimulation remains a problem. So, attempts to improve ovarian responses, for example, by using combined gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue(GnRH-a) and human menopausal gonadotropin(hMG) have shown limited success. It is reported that response of granulosa cells in vitro to FSH is stimulated by co-incubation with IGF-l, and IGF-l production can be increased by growth hormone. This suggest that combination regimen of G.H. and hMG may augment follicle recruitment. In fifteen patients who had previous history of poor ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation after pituitary suppression with mid -luteal GnRH-a, the effectiveness of cotreatment with G.H. in IVF program was evaluated using a combination regimen of G.R. and hMG at Korea University Hospital IVF Clinic. Ovarian responses to gonadotropin stimulation in control and GH-treated cycles assessed by total dose and duration of hMG treatment, follicular development and peak $E_2$ level, number of eggs retrieved, and fertilization rates were also assessed. In each group, serum and follicular fluid IGF-1 concentrations on day of egg collection were measured by RIA after acidification and extraction by reveresed phase chromatography. Patients receiving G.H. required fewer days and ampules of gonadotropins, developed more oocytes, and more embryos transferred. But, the differences were not statistically significant, except the duration of hMG treatment. Our data showed a significantly higher concentration of IGF-l in the serum, not in the follicular fluid, of patients treated with G.H. compared with control group. These data suggest that growth hormone treatment does not improve the ovarian response in women with limited ovarian reserve to gonadotropin stimulation for IVF.

  • PDF

Research Problems of Bovine Embryo Transfer - A Review of Superovulation - (소 수정란 이식의 현황과 문제점 -수정란 생산 중심으로-)

  • 양보석;임경순
    • Journal of Embryo Transfer
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-10
    • /
    • 1990
  • The individual difference of superovulatory responses and inferior embryo quality in superovulated cattle may cause disturbances in the endocrine profile, follicular steroidogenesis, nuclear maturation of nocyte, fertilization and cleavage of embryos. However, the reasons why those disturbances are occurred were not understood. The methods of the improvement of superovulatory response and embryo production were the use of anti-PMSG if PMSG used, pure FSH or controlled FSH-LH inducer, priming dose of gonadotropin in the first few day of the estrous cycle and GnRH or analogue. However, all of the above methods were not reduced the individual differences but improved embryo production We must continue the fundamental studies to understand the mechanism.

  • PDF

Effect of GnRH analogue on the bone mineral density of precocious or early pubertal girls (성조숙증 혹은 조기 사춘기가 있는 여아에서 단기간의 성선자극호르몬 방출호르몬 효능약제 사용이 골밀도에 미치는 영향)

  • Lim, Jeong Sook;Han, Heon-Seok
    • Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
    • /
    • v.52 no.12
    • /
    • pp.1370-1376
    • /
    • 2009
  • Purpose:Treatment of precocity with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) might theoretically exert a detrimental effect on the bone mass during pubertal development. We investigated the short-term changes in bone mineral density (BMD) during GnRHa treatment and the enhancement in the changes with the co-administration of GnRHa and human growth hormone (hGH). Methods:Forty girls with precocious or early puberty who were using GnRHa for more than 1 year were enrolled. Of them, 14 concurrently received hGH. Lumbar bone mineral density was measured before and after the treatment, and bone mineral density-standard deviation scores (BMD-SDSs) were compared according to chronologic age (CA) and bone age (BA), as well as according to the administration of GnRHa alone (Group I) or the co-administration of hGH and GnRHa (Group II). Results:BMDs before and after treatment were in the normal range according to CA but were significantly lower according to BA (P<0.05). During treatment, BMD-SDSs did not change according to CA but significantly increased according to BA (P<0.05). BMD-SDSs in group I did not change during treatment according to CA or BA, while those in group II increased significantly according to BA (P<0.05), but not according to CA. Conclusion:Lumbar BMD was adequate according to CA at initial manifestation of precocity but was lower if compared to BA, that is, BMD did not increase with BA. Because co-treatment with hGH significantly increased BMD-SDSs according to BA, hGH co-treatment could be considered during GnRHa therapy.