• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.55-66
• /
• 2019

지난 66년간 한미동맹은 냉전시기에 미국이 한국에게 안보를 지원하고 한국은 미국에게 정책의 자율성을 일부 양보하는 전형적인 비대칭 동맹이었다. 그러나 이명박 정부는 군사적 성격의 한미동맹을 '포괄적 전략 동맹', '가치동맹'으로, 박근혜 정부는 '협력의 프론티어', '글로벌 파트너십'으로 발전시켰으며, 문재인 정부는 '호혜적·포괄적 동맹'으로의 발전을 국가안보전략에서 밝혔다. 본 연구는 트럼프 행정부의 동맹정책 변화에 따른 한국의 정책적 자율성을 보장하기 위해 한미 동맹정책 발전을 위한 호혜적·포괄적 한미동맹관계 구축 방안을 모색하는 것이 목적이다. 연구에 따른 분석결과는 한미동맹의 호혜적·포괄적 구축을 위해 한국은 미국이 추진하는 '인도-태평양 전략' 참여와 양국의 상호 경제적 이익을 위한 지속적인 외교적 노력 그리고 공공외교 강화의 필요성을 보여 준다.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.307-315
• /
• 2014

This paper aims to empirically examine how shipping companies can effectively acquire knowledge from their strategic alliance partners. This paper adopts cooperative network embeddedness mechanism, such as network density and tie closeness, as a channel through which to acquire more knowledge for shipping participants within a strategic alliance network. This study also examines the moderating role of competition between alliance partners in reinforcing the effectiveness of the cooperative relationships on the knowledge acquisition. Based on the literature, hypotheses to predict the aforementioned associations between cooperative network embeddedness and knowledge acquisition and the moderating role of competition in facilitating that association are established. A quantitative research method using survey data conducted in the Korean shipping industry was employed in order to empirically test the presented hypotheses. The results show that if players in a shipping alliance network are embedded in a dense network and have close relationships with their alliance partners, this helps to facilitate a greater degree of knowledge acquisition from the partners; and the impact of network density on the knowledge acquisition would be intensified with the higher level of competition between shipping companies.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.287-294
• /
• 2008

Recently, amount of cargoes from main ports in Northeast Asia have rapidly increased and as well surplus port development in same region corresponded with the boom in external trade that resulted from successful export-oriented economics strategy by China, Japan and South Korea. To cope with this business circumstances, a certain form of port alliance is desperately needed to provide a suitable service to customer and establish their countervailing power against the shipping alliance. Nevertheless, Incheon seaport has not made a definite port alliance system with main ports in Northern China yet. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify the key success factors to form a port alliance through examining previous studies. We have benchmarked previous studies which are related to main ports in global region and the questionnaire on customers of ports. By studying this, we are able to suggest a few strategies for forming successful port alliance to enhance Incheon port's capabilities in the long term plan. As a policy proposal, this study suggests Incheon port and main ports in Northern China should construct a logistics infrastructure through mutual investment and provide an incentive system when the ocean carrier makes port call to both ports.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.212-217
• /
• 2009

Strategic alliance is a proactive management process that integrates and optimizes value-added services of each party to best achieve business objectives of all parties within the relationship. Under the current competitive global environment, strategic alliance can produce a "Win-Win" situation and thus change paradigm that has resided in the construction industry. While many studies revealed the significance of alliance relationship in the industry, its impact on project performance has rarely been analyzed. Using the data obtained from 661 construction projects in the Construction Industry Institute database (359 projects from 38 owners and 302 projects from 29 contractors), this study first diagnoses the implementation status of strategic alliance at both project and company levels. Then, its impact on project performance is quantified and discussed. The descriptive analysis performed in this study revealed that an average of 79% of owner companies and 69% of contractor companies have ever implemented strategic alliance into at least one of their projects. However, both owner and contractor companies did not always use the strategy for all or their projects. Only 33% and 30% of projects reported by owners and contractors have been completed under alliance relationship, respectively. Analyzing the alliance impact on project performance, this study also establishes that strategic alliance positively affects project performance of both owners and contractors while owners should consider and control the level of its use for their projects. Recognizing and understanding the benefits from strategic alliance will be a starting point to produce mutual success among project participants, ultimately allowing the construction industry to go forward to a sustainable industry that transfers success from one project to the other.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.145-158
• /
• 2019

Purpose - Alliance members have constantly revised market strategies over time by withdrawing membership from a current alliance, joining another alliance, or constructing a new alliance. From the perspective of the signaling effect, the purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts of partner volatility (new member, old member, and new group) on firm value. Design/methodology - To analyze the impact of partner volatility on firm value, companies in strategic alliances are classified into the three groups of new partner, existing partner, and new alliance, and the effects on company value are verified through an event study and the signaling effect analysis. Findings - This study proved that new partners and newly formed strategic alliances have higher expectation effects than old partner company groups, and have a more positive effect on the relevant firms' stock prices. In addition, the result of the study showed the same valid results as the alliance levels, and showed that investors' expectations were higher with new partners and new alliances than with old partners. Research Implications - A new perspective on the signaling effects of strategic alliances among shipping lines was presented in this study by grouping alliance types including new member, old member, and new group. The results provide useful insights for selecting partners and firm values of alliance announcement times. Originality/value - This study analyzed partner volatility on relevant companies' stock prices from the perspective of investors from the global shipping conference reorganization in 2017. Strategic alliances were classified into the three categories of new partner, old partner, and new alliance, and the effects on firm value were verified.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.545-553
• /
• 2007

글로벌 생산네트워크의 변화로 인해 우리나라 주요 항만은 새로운 전략의 수립이 요구되고 있다. 무역 패턴의 변화로 인해 중국, 일본, 한국을 포함한 아시아의 경제적 성장이 급속히 이루어지고 있는 상황에서 동북아에 집중되는 항만 물동량을 흡수하기 위해 우리나라 중심 항만들의 환적기능 강화가 필요한 시점이다. 특히 동북아 포트얼라이언스를 활용한 환적기능 강화는 변화하는 무역환경에서 우리 중심항만들이 경쟁력 확보를 위한 기회가 될 수 있을 것이다. 따라서, 본 연구의 목적은 부산항과 광양항 같은 우리나라 주요 항만들의 환적기능을 촉진하기 위한 포트얼라이언스 전략을 제안하고자 하는 것이다. 두 주요 항만의 물류비즈니스 모델 수립을 위해 동북아 포트얼라이언스의 방향과 중국과 일본의 후보 항만들을 제시하였다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제11권9호
• /
• pp.174-186
• /
• 2011

이 연구는 세계 주요 미디어 기업의 규모와 현황을 파악하고 한국 미디어 기업의 글로벌 위상 및 향후 방향을 다루었다. 이를 위해 포브스 글로벌 2000 기업 중 미디어 기업을 4개의 범주로 매핑하였다. 연구 결과, 한국의 미디어 기업은 4그룹에 속하며, 글로벌 수준은 취약하였다. 따라서 미디어 산업 가치사슬에서 경쟁력이 있는 요인을 찾아, 이를 바탕으로 글로벌 전략을 도출하고자 하였다. 연구 결과 미디어 산업의 가치사슬에서 볼 때, 한국은 콘텐츠, 단말기, 차세대 네트워크에서 글로벌 경쟁력을 가지고 있으며, 이들의 연합 전략을 펴는 것이 유리하다. 또한 글로벌 미디어 기업 전략이 반드시 전 세계일 필요는 없다. 미국의 대형 미디어 그룹을 제외하고는 언어, 문화, 지역적으로 글로벌 진출로 성공적인 미디어 기업들이 많다. 따라서 방송 콘텐츠가 아시아 시장에서 인지도를 높이고, 실질적으로도 성과를 내고 있으므로, 이를 중심으로 '선택과 집중' 전략을 펴는 것이 유리하다. 이 연구에서는 아시아 및 남아메리카 등 신흥 시장에 집중하는 것이 유리하며, 콘텐츠와 단말기, 차세대 네트워크의 연합 전략이 필요함을 제안하였다.

• Asian Journal of Business Environment
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.29-31
• /
• 2019

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to examine the newly formed a partnership of Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway (Berkshire) and JPMorgan through the lens of strategic alliance, corporate philanthropy, and corporate social responsibility. Research design, data, and methodology - This is an analytical case study that examines the existing scholarly articles in strategic alliances, corporate philanthropy, and corporate social responsibility to explain the recent strategic alliance. Results - There is a clear limitation in explaining this type of unconventional strategic alliance with exiting definitions and concepts because there is no existing study or case available today. Forming a strategic business alliance to create and operate healthcare for their domestic employees could be viewed as a social innovation that resulted from an effort to resolve a social problem, the ineffective healthcare system in the U.S., rather than focusing on business benefits and profits. Conclusions - The success or failure of this type of business alliance would certainly affect the current healthcare system of the United States and global businesses and healthcare industries in the future. However, just entering or tapping into uncharted territory by these three companies to deal with a social issue is significant enough to merit further exploration and analysis for scholars and practitioners.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제36권5호
• /
• pp.409-418
• /
• 2012

컨테이너 선사들은 세계경제의 불황과 고유가가 지속되고 있는 상황에서 선박운영비용을 낮추기 위한 다각적인 노력들을 전개하고 있다. 이러한 상황에서, Grand Alliance는 극동 북미서안 서비스인 CCX와 극동 북미동안 서비스인 NCE에 서비스별 선박추가 투입대신에 Dedicated Feeder 투입을 하기로 결정하였다. 즉, 기간항로의 선박이 북중국항만에 기항하지 않고 환적항인 부산항에서 Feeder선을 통하여 환적 운송하게 된다. 본 연구에서는 전용피더 서비스 도입을 통한 환적의 경제성 효과를 확인하기 위하여 Grand Alliance 컨테이너 서비스의 실제 운영 자료에 대해 분석하였다. 이와 같은 전략을 통해 Grand Alliance의 'NCE, 'CCX'항로는 기간항로에 투입되는 선박의 감속운항이 가능하게 되어 선박 운영비의 절감 효과를 보이고 있다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제26권
• /
• pp.115-141
• /
• 2005

This study explores how strategic alliance activities are evolving and the factors that impact on the formation and development of airline alliances. Findings show the initiation of regional and more liberalized bilateral, or open skies, agreements have removed some of the impediments to structural changes in international aviation. Airlines in more liberal markets enter into greater numbers and more integrative forms of alliances. Also, airlines, on average, achieve better results of operation if the market is more liberal. Essentially, there is a positive relationship between the developments of alliances and the liberalization of air transport markets. It has been questioned that the US bilateral open skies agreements provide its carriers more access to the global market and countries that do not enter into such agreements with the US risk a loss of traffic. Consequently, open skies agreements may enable carriers who have the freedom to exercise market power to be dominant in the markets. This suggests that regulatory coordination and liberalization of international aviation reinforce each other and should therefore be pursued simultaneously.