• Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
• /
• v.61 no.12
• /
• pp.403-406
• /
• 2018

Floating-Harbor syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder associated with SRCAP mutation. To date, approximately 50 cases of Floating-Harbor syndrome have been reported, but none have been reported in Korea yet. Floating-Harbor syndrome is characterized by delayed bony maturation, unique facial features, and language impairment. Here, we present a 6-year-old boy with a triangular face, deep-set protruding eyes, low-set ears, wide nose with narrow nasal bridge, short philtrum, long thin lips, clinodactyly, and developmental delay that was transferred to our pediatric clinic for genetic evaluation. He showed progressive delay in the area of language and cognition-adaption as he grew. He had previously undergone chromosomal analysis at another hospital due to his language delay, but his karyotype was normal. We performed targeted exome sequencing, considering several syndromes with similar phenotypes. Library preparation was performed with the TruSight One sequencing panel, which enriches the sample for about 4,800 genes of clinical relevance. Massively parallel sequencing was conducted with NextSeq. An identified variant was confirmed by Sanger sequencing of the patient and his parents. Finally, the patient was confirmed as the first Korean case of Floating-Harbor syndrome with a novel SRCAP (Snf2 related CREBBP activator protein) mutation (c.7732dupT, p.Ser2578Phefs*6), resulting in early termination of the protein; it was not found in either of his healthy parents or a control population. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe a boy with Floating-Harbor syndrome with a novel SRCAP mutation diagnosed by targeted exome sequencing in Korea.

• Journal of The Korean Society of Inherited Metabolic disease
• /
• v.22 no.1
• /
• pp.28-36
• /
• 2022

Purpose: Detection of abnormal metabolites in plasma amino acid (PAA) and urine organic acid (UOA) analyses has been used to diagnose clinical mitochondrial diseases, such as Leigh syndrome. In this study, the diagnostic values and effectiveness of PAA and UOA analyses were reviewed. Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients with Leigh syndrome who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2018 in a single tertiary care center. Through a whole mitochondrial sequencing and nuclear DNA associated mitochondrial gene panel analysis, 19 patients were found to be positive for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutation-associated Leigh syndrome, and 57 patients were negative. Their PAA and UOA analyses results were then compared. Results: In the comparison of the PAA and UOA analyses results between the two groups, no abnormal metabolites showed obvious differences between the mtDNA mutation-positive Leigh syndrome and mtDNA mutation-negative Leigh syndrome groups. Conclusion: PAA and UOA analyses are inappropriate test methods for diagnosing Leigh syndrome or screening of mtDNA mutation-associated Leigh syndrome. However, UOA analysis might still be a suitable screening test for Leigh syndrome.