• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.403-407
• /
• 2006

This research aims to reduce severe damages to human beings and properties from floods that ravage Korea every year, by estimating right time to hydraulic structures based on the characteristics of variations in flood flows. To establish this permanent means for the flood mitigation, this research analyse design floods of various dams and hydraulic structures in connection with time of occurrence of the weather abnormalities in Korea. This research was derived the optimal regionalization of the precipitation data which can be classified by the climatologically and geographically homogeneous regions in Korea. Using the L-moment ratios and Kolmogorov-Smimov test, the underlying regional probability distribution was identified to be the GEV distribution among applied distributions. The regional and at-site analyses using L-moment for the design rainfall were tested by Monte Carlo simulation. Error tests were computed and compared with those resulting from at-site Monte Carlo simulation. Consequently, optimal design rainfalls following the regions and consecutive durations were derived by the regional frequency analysis.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.26-26
• /
• 2015

기후변화나 인위적인 요인 등에 의해 수문 자료에 비정상성(nonstationarity)이 나타나면서 정상성 가정 하에서 수행되는 빈도해석으로는 정확한 확률수문량 산정이 어려운 실정이다. 최근 이를 보완하기 위한 비정상성 빈도해석에 대한 연구가 진행되고 있고, 이와 더불어 비정상성 지역빈도 해석에 대한 관심도 높아지고 있다. 비정상성 지역빈도해석은 대개 홍수지수법(index flood method)을 기반으로 진행되고 있는데, 홍수지수와 성장곡선(growth curve)에 시간에 따른 변화를 고려하느냐의 여부에 따라 다양한 형태의 홍수지수모형이 적용되고 있다. 본 연구는 다양한 형태의 홍수지수모형의 성능을 평가하여 비정상성 자료에 적합한 형태를 선정하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 위치 매개변수가 시간에 따라 변화하는 비정상성 GEV 분포(GEV100)를 모분포로 하는 지점들로 지역들을 구성하고, Monte Carlo 모의를 통해 발생시킨 자료에 여러 형태의 홍수지수모형을 적용하여 각 모형의 성능을 평가하였다. 모의실험 결과 홍수 지수는 시간에 따른 변화가 없고, 성장곡선은 시간에 따라 변화하는 형태인 홍수지수모형이 다른 형태의 모형에 비해 대체로 더 정확한 확률수문량을 산정할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 우리나라 기상청 관할 강우 관측 지점들 중 GEV100 분포가 적합한 것으로 선정된 지점들을 하나의 지역으로 구성하여 모의실험에서 적용한 것과 동일한, 여러 형태의 홍수지수모형을 적용한 결과 모의실험 결과와 일치하게 성장곡선에만 비정상성 고려된 홍수지수모형이 상대적으로 정확한 확률강우량을 산정하는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 GEV100 모형 기반의 비정상성 지역빈도해석을 수행하기 위해서는 성장곡선만 시간에 따라 변화하는 홍수지수모형이 적합할 것으로 판단된다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.252-263
• /
• 2008

This study was conducted to derive the optimal regionalization of the precipitation data which can be classified on the basis of climatologically and geographically homogeneous regions all over the regions except Cheju and Ulreung islands in Korea. A total of 65 rain gauges were used to regional analysis of precipitation. Annual maximum series for the consecutive durations of 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72hr were used for various statistical analyses. K-means clustering mettled is used to identify homogeneous regions all over the regions. Five homogeneous regions for the precipitation were classified by the K-means clustering. Using the L-moment ratios and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the underlying regional probability distribution was identified to be the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution among applied distributions. The regional and at-site parameters of the generalized extreme value distribution were estimated by the linear combination of the probability weighted moments, L-moment. The regional and at-site analysis for the design rainfall were tested by Monte Carlo simulation. Relative root-mean-square error (RRMSE), relative bias (RBIAS) and relative reduction (RR) in RRMSE were computed and compared with those resulting from at-site Monte Carlo simulation. All show that the regional analysis procedure can substantially reduce the RRMSE, RBIAS and RR in RRMSE in the prediction of design rainfall. Consequently, optimal design rainfalls following the regions and consecutive durations were derived by the regional frequency analysis.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2005.05b
• /
• pp.567-570
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 GEV분포형에 패해 L-모멘트법을 적용하여 추정된 지점빈도 설계강우량의 변동추이가 관측년수변화에 따라 어떠한 변동추이를 나타내는지를 규명함으로써 향후 수리시설물의 설계방향모색에 도움이 되고자 한다. 현재 우리나라는 수리시설물의 설계나 관리시에 PMP, PMF 또는 빈도별 설계수문량 등을 이용하고 있다. 그러나, 이러한 수문량들은 매년 관측되는 수문관측치들에 의해서 매번 변하고 있으며 또한 이러한 변화의 양상과 크기는 각 지점별로 매우 다양하게 나타나고 있다. 이로인해, 수리시설물의 설계 및 관리시 관측 지점별로 매우 상이한 설계수문량을 제시하기도 하며 특정관측자료로 인해 설계수문량이 급변하는 등 많은 혼란을 초래하고 있는 실정이다. 따라서, 현재 관측지점별로 나타나고 있는 설계수문량의 변화양상을 분석함으로써 추후에 변화될 설계수문량의 양상 예측이 가능할 것으로 판단된다. 본 연구는 우리나라 전역에 걸쳐 기록년수가 가장 긴 강릉, 서울, 인천, 추풍령, 포항, 대구, 전주, 울산, 광주, 부산, 목포 및 여수기상대의 총 12개소를 선정하여 해당 기상대의 24시간 최대강우량을 대상으로 지점빈도분석을 실시한다. 지점빈도분석시 적용된 분포형과 매개변수추정법은 최근 가장 많이 사용되고 있는 GEV분포형과 L-모멘트법을 적용한다. 또한. 최종결론은 설계수문량의 양상을 형태별로 분류하고 형태에 따른 특성들과 예상되는 현상들에 대해 기술하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2004.05b
• /
• pp.635-639
• /
• 2004

댐과 같은 구조물의 설계시 큰 강우량에 내한 분포함수의 적합성을 놀일 필요가 있다. 이에 대해 Wang (1997a and b)은 큰 설계량에 내한 적합성을 놀이기 위해 LH 모멘트와 고차 PWM(higher Probability Weighted Moments)방법을 제안하였다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 자 지역별로 대표적인 4개 지점의 일 강우량 자료를 사용하여 제안된 고차 PWM 방법의 적용성을 살펴보았다. 그 과정으로 가장 낮은 차수인 일반적인 PWM 방법과 더 높은 차수의 PWM 방법을 이용하여, GEV(Generalized Extreme Value) 분포와 Gumbel 분포에 대한 매개변수를 추정한 후 이 추정치를 확률지에 실측치와 함께 도시하여 결과를 비교하였다. 그리고 PPCC(Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient) 적합도 검정결과를 통해 추정된 매개변수의 적합성을 확인하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers Conference
• /
• 1999.10c
• /
• pp.479-485
• /
• 1999

This study was conducted to derived design floods by Generalized Extreme Value(GEV) distributiion for the annual maximum series at ten watersheds along Han, Nagdong, Geum , Yeongsan and Seomjin river systems. Adequency for the analysis of flood data used in this study was established by the test of Independence, Homogeneity , detection of Outliers. Coefficient of variation , skewness and kurtosis were calculated by the L-Moment, and LH-Moment ratio respectively. Parameters were estimated by the Method of L-Method of LH-Moment. Design floods obtained by Method of L-Moments and LH-Moments using different methods for plotting positions in GEV distributions and were compared with those obatined using the Method of L-Moments and LH-Moments by the Relative Mean Errors and Realtive Absoulte Errors. It was found that desgin floods derived by the method of L-Moments and LH-Moments using Cunnane plotting position foumula in the GEV distribution are much closer to those of the observed data in comparison with those obtained by methods of L-moments and LH-moments using the other formula for poltting postions from the viewpoint of Relative Mean Errors and Relative Absoulte Errors. In view of the fact that hydraulic structures indcluding dams and levees are generally usiong design floods with the return period of two hundred years or so, design floods derived by LH-Moments are seemed to be more reasonable than those of L-Moments in the GEV distribution.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.27 no.6
• /
• pp.947-958
• /
• 2014

Understanding extreme precipitation events is very important for flood planning purposes. Especially, the r-year return level is a common measure of extreme events. In this paper, we present a spatial analysis of precipitation return level using hierarchical Bayesian modeling. For intensity, we model annual maximum daily precipitations and daily precipitation above a high threshold at 62 stations in Korea with generalized extreme value(GEV) and generalized Pareto distribution(GPD), respectively. The spatial dependence among return levels is incorporated to the model through a latent Gaussian process of the GEV and GPD model parameters. We apply the proposed model to precipitation data collected at 62 stations in Korea from 1973 to 2011.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2004.05b
• /
• pp.1098-1102
• /
• 2004

본 연구에서는 수도권을 포함하는 한강하류부에서 가장 중요한 측수지점중 하나인 인도교지점의 연 최대 홍수량 자료에 내해서 빈도해석을 시행하였다. 자료를 3개의 자료(자료 I : $1918\~1940$, 자료 II: $1952\~2002$, 자료 III: 결측치를 제외한 $1918\~2002$)로 구분하였으며, 수문자료에 일반적으로 많이 사용하는 13가지 확률 분포형을 적용하여 매개변수를 추정한 뒤 적합성여부를 판정하였으며, 적합도 검정방법 및 도시적인 방법을 통하여 적정 확률분포형을 선정하였고, 채택된 분포형(gamma-3, GEV, Gumbel, Weibull-2)에 내하여 확률홍수량을 산정하였다. 또한, 위치도시공식(plotting position formula)과 역사적 홍수정보(historic information)를 이용한 빈도해석 결과와도 비교${\cdot}$분석하였다. 그 결과 확률분포형 가운데에는 GEV와 Gumbel 분포형이 인도교지점의 홍수빈도해석에 적합한 것으로 판단된다.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.48 no.7
• /
• pp.567-579
• /
• 2015

This study performed the non-stationary flood frequency analysis considering time-varying parameters of a probability density function. Also, return period and risk under non-stationary condition were estimated. A stationary model and three non-stationary models using Generalized Extreme Value(GEV) were developed. The only location parameter was assumed as time-varying parameter in the first model. In second model, the only scale parameter was assumed as time-varying parameter. Finally, the both parameters were assumed as time varying parameter in the last model. Relative likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion were used to select appropriate model. The suggested procedure in this study was applied to eight multipurpose dams in South Korea. Using relative likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion it is shown that the inflow into the Hapcheon dam and the Seomjingang dam were suitable for non-stationary GEV model but the other six dams were suitable for stationary GEV model. Also, it is shown that the estimated return period under non-stationary condition was shorter than those estimated under stationary condition.

• Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.83-94
• /
• 2010

The objective of this study was to determine the best probability distributions of annual, seasonal and monthly precipitation in Korea. Data observed at 32 stations in Korea were analyzed using the L-moment ratio diagram and the average weighted distance (AWD) to identify the best probability distributions of each precipitation. The probability distribution was best represented by 3-parameter Weibull distribution (W3) for the annual precipitation, 3-parameter lognormal distribution (LN3) for spring and autumn seasons, and generalized extreme value distribution (GEV) for summer and winter seasons. The best probability distribution models for monthly precipitation were LN3 for January, W3 for February and July, 2-parameter Weibull distribution (W2) for March, generalized Pareto distribution (GPA) for April, September, October and November, GEV for May and June, and log-Pearson type III (LP3) for August and December. However, from the goodness-of-fit test for the best probability distributions of the best fit, GPA for April, September, October and November, and LN3 for January showed considerably high reject rates due to computational errors in estimation of the probability distribution parameters and relatively higher AWD values. Meanwhile, analyses using data from 55 stations including additional 23 stations indicated insignificant differences to those using original data. Further studies using more long-term data are needed to identify more optimal probability distributions for each precipitation.