• 제목/요약/키워드: Framework of Level Diagnosis

검색결과 32건 처리시간 0.019초

인지진단이론에 근거한 TIMSS 2011의 과학 결과 분석을 통한 인지 속성의 국제비교 (International Comparison of Cognitive Attributes using Analysis on Science Results at TIMSS 2011 Based on the Cognitive Diagnostic Theory)

  • 김지영;김수진;동효관
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제35권2호
    • /
    • pp.267-275
    • /
    • 2015
  • 본 연구의 목적은 우리나라 학생들의 인지적 속성의 특징을 인지진단이론에 근거하여 국제적인 수준에서 비교 분석하고 우리나라 교육에 주는 시사점을 찾는 것이다. TIMSS 2011의 평가틀에 근거하여 9개의 인지 속성을 추출하였고 TIMSS 2011의 과학 문항 216개에 대해 각 문항이 어떠한 인지 속성들을 요구하는지 판단하여 Q행렬을 작성하였다. 총 5차례의 검토와 수정을 반복하여 타당도를 점검하고 최종적인 Q행렬을 작성한 후, 다층 IRT 분석을 실시하여 인지 속성에 따른 국가별 특성을 파악하였다. 분석을 통해 나타난 우리나라의 인지적 속성을 TIMSS 2011의 과학성취도 상위 15개국과 비교한 결과 우리나라 학생들에게 모형사용하기, 자료분석하기, 결론도출하기, 평가 및 정당화하기는 쉬운 속성에 해당하였고 회상/인식하기, 설명하기, 분류하기, 통합하기, 가설설정 및 실험설계하기는 어려운 속성에 해당하였다. 우리나라 학생들이 가장 쉬워하는 인지 속성은 자료해석하기였고 가장 어려워하는 인지 속성은 설명하기였다. 우리나라의 경우 쉬운 인지 속성의 대부분은 비교국 중에서 가장 쉽게 여기고 어려운 인지 속성은 가장 어렵게 여기는 것으로 나타나 극단적인 특성을 보였다. 따라서 특정한 인지 속성이 많이 활용되도록 하기 보다는 여러가지 인지 속성이 골고루 활용되도록 과학 교육과정과 과학 교과서를 구성할 필요가 있겠다.

가정간호 서비스 질 평가를 위한 도구개발연구 (A basic research for evaluation of a Home Care Nursing Delivery System)

  • 김모임;조원정;김의숙;김성규;장순복;유호신
    • 가정간호학회지
    • /
    • 제6권
    • /
    • pp.33-45
    • /
    • 1999
  • The purpose of this study was to develop a basic framework and criteria for evaluation of quality care provided to patients with the attributes of disease in the home care nursing field, and to provide measurement tools for home health care in the future. The study design was a developmental study for evaluation of hospital-based HCN(home care nursing) in Korea. The study process was as follows: a home care nursing study team of College of Nursing. Yonsei University reviewed the nursing records of 47 patients who were enrolled at Yonsei University Medical Center Home Care Center in March, 1995. Twenty-five patients were insured at that time, were selected from 47 patients receiving home care service for study feasibility with six disease groups; Caesarean Section (C/S), simple nephrectomy, Liver cirrhosis(LC), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD), Lung cancer or cerebrovascular accident(CVA). In this study, the following items were selected : First step : Preliminary study 1. Criteria and items were selected on the basis of related literature on each disease area. 2. Items were identified by home care nurses. 3. A physician in charge reviewed the criteria and content of selected items. 4. Items were revised through preliminary study offered to both HCN patients and discharged patients from the home care center. Second step : Pretest 1. To verify the content of the items, a pretest was conducted with 18 patients of which there were three patients in each of the six selected disease groups. Third step : Test of reliability and validity of tools 1. Using the collected data from 25 patients with either cis, Simple nephrectomy, LC, COPD, Lung cancer, or CVA. the final items were revised through a panel discussion among experts in medical care who were researchers, doctors, or nurses. 2. Reliability and validity of the completed tool were verified with both inpatients and HCN patients in each of field for researches. The study results are as follows: 1. Standard for discharge with HCN referral The referral standard for home care, which included criteria for discharge with HCN referral and criteria leaving the hospital were established. These were developed through content analysis from the results of an open-ended questionnaire to related doctors concerning characteristic for discharge with HCN referral for each of the disease groups. The final criteria was decided by discussion among the researchers. 2. Instrument for measurement of health statusPatient health status was measured pre and post home care by direct observation and interview with an open-ended questionnaire which consisted of 61 items based on Gorden's nursing diagnosis classification. These included seven items on health knowledge and health management, eight items on nutrition and metabolism, three items on elimination, five items on activity and exercise, seven items on perception and cognition, three items on sleep and rest, three items on self-perception, three items on role and interpersonal relations, five items on sexuality and reproduction, five items on coping and stress, four items on value and religion, three items on family. and three items on facilities and environment. 3. Instrument for measurement of self-care The instrument for self-care measurement was classified with scales according to the attributes of the disease. Each scale measured understanding level and practice level by a Yes or No scale. Understanding level was measured by interview but practice level was measured by both observation and interview. Items for self-care measurement included 14 for patients with a CVA, five for women who had a cis, ten for patients with lung cancer, 12 for patients with COPD, five for patients with a simple nephrectomy, and 11 for patients with LC. 4. Record for follow-up management This included (1) OPD visit sheet, (2) ER visit form, (3) complications problem form, (4) readmission sheet. and (5) visit note for others medical centers which included visit date, reason for visit, patient name, caregivers, sex, age, time and cost required for visit, and traffic expenses, that is, there were open-end items that investigated OPD visits, emergency room visits, the problem and solution of complications, readmissions and visits to other medical institution to measure health problems and expenditures during the follow up period. 5. Instrument to measure patients satisfaction The satisfaction measurement instrument by Reisseer(1975) was referred to for the development of a tool to measure patient home care satisfaction. The instrument was an open-ended questionnaire which consisted of 11 domains; treatment, nursing care, information, time consumption, accessibility, rapidity, treatment skill, service relevance, attitude, satisfaction factors, dissatisfaction factors, overall satisfaction about nursing care, and others. In conclusion, Five evaluation instruments were developed for home care nursing. These were (1)standard for discharge with HCN referral. (2)instrument for measurement of health status, (3)instrument for measurement of self-care. (4)record for follow-up management, and (5)instrument to measure patient satisfaction. Also, the five instruments can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the service to assure quality. Further research is needed to increase the reliability and validity of instrument through a community-based HCN evaluation.

  • PDF