• 제목/요약/키워드: Finishing beef cattle

검색결과 32건 처리시간 0.017초

한우 비육후기 사료에 칼슘 첨가제(석회석) 제거가 성장 및 육질특성에 미치는 영향 (Effects of Deletion of Ca Supplement (limestone) on Growth and Beef Quality in Hanwoo Finishing Steers)

  • 이종언;박남건;성필남;진신흠;박범영;김규일
    • Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    • /
    • 제45권3호
    • /
    • pp.455-462
    • /
    • 2003
  • 이 연구는 소 비육후기에 칼슘제(석회석)를 첨가하지 않은 사료의 급여가 성장율, 근내지방도 및 혈청 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin $D_3$ ($1,25(OH)_2D_3$) 함량에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위하여 수행되었다. 거세 한우 24두(20${\sim}$24개월령)를 12두씩 대조구(석회석 2.5% 함유 농후사료)와 칼슘제 무첨가구(석회석 0%)로 배치하여 223일 동안 사료(농후사료 및 오차드그라스 건초)와 물을 무제한 급여하였고, 사양시험이 완료된 후 도축하여 육질을 평가하였다. 혈청 $Ca^{2+}$, Ca 및 P 함량에는 처리 간 차이가 없었으나 (P>0.05), 1,25(OH)2D3 함량은 시험 시작 후 2 또는 6개월째 모두 칼슘제 무첨가구가 대조구보다 (각각 78.3 vs 51.7 또는 80.3 vs 51.1 pg/mL) 높았다 (P<0.01). 칼슘제를 첨가하지 않은 사료를 급여한 비육우가 대조구보다 농후사료 섭취량은 증가하고 건초 섭취량은 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 일당증체량은 대조구보다 칼슘제 무첨가구에서 높았다(P<0.01). 등심단면적(82.8 vs 77.2 $cm^2$), 근내지방도(5.1 vs 2.2) 및 지방 함량(10.2 vs 6.7%)이 칼슘제 무첨가구가 대조구보다 높았고 (P<0.05), 수분 함량(67.6 vs 70.4%)은 낮았다 (P < 0.05). 등심 육색, pH 및 보수력에서는 처리 간 차이가 없었으나 전단력에서는 칼슘제 무첨가구에서 (2.9 vs 3.2 kg/1.27-cm diameter core) 약간 낮게 (P = 0.08) 나타났다. 관능평가에서는 칼슘제 무첨가구가 대조구보다 연도 (4.9 vs 4.5) 및 향미(4.9 vs 4.6)가 약간 개선되었으나 (P<0.05) 다즙성에서는 처리간 차이가 없었다 (P>0.05). 본 연구결과는 비육후기에 칼슘제(석회석)를 첨가하지 않은 사료의 급여는 에너지 섭취의 증가 또는 1,25$(OH)_2D_3$의 합성 촉진을 통하여, 근내지방합성이 증가되어 성장율 및 근내지방도를 개선한다는 것을 제시하였다.

Effect of By-product Feed-based Silage Feeding on the Performance, Blood Metabolites, and Carcass Characteristics of Hanwoo Steers (a Field Study)

  • Kim, Y.I.;Park, J.M.;Lee, Y.H.;Lee, M.;Choi, D.Y.;Kwak, Wan-Sup
    • Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
    • /
    • 제28권2호
    • /
    • pp.180-187
    • /
    • 2015
  • This study was conducted to determine the effects of feeding by-product feed (BF)-based silage on the performance, blood metabolite parameters, and carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers. The BF-based silage was composed of 50% spent mushroom substrate, 21% recycled poultry bedding, 15% cut ryegrass straw, 10.8% rice bran, 2% molasses, 0.6% bentonite, and 0.6% microbial additive (on a wet basis), and ensiled for over 5 d. Fifteen steers were allocated to three diets during the growing and fattening periods (3.1 and 9.8 months, respectively): a control diet (concentrate mix and free access to rice straw), a 50% BF-based silage diet (control diet+50% of maximum BF-based silage intake), and a 100% BF-based silage diet (the same amount of concentrate mix and ad libitum BF-based silage). The BF-based silage was fed during the growing and fattening periods, and was replaced with larger particles of rice straw during the finishing period. After 19.6 months of the whole period all the steers were slaughtered. Compared with feeding rice straw, feeding BF-based silage tended (p = 0.10) to increase the average daily gain (27%) and feed efficiency (18%) of the growing steers, caused by increased voluntary feed intake. Feeding BF-based silage had little effect on serum constituents, electrolytes, enzymes, or the blood cell profiles of fattening steers, except for low serum Ca and high blood urea concentrations (p<0.05). Feeding BF-based silage did not affect cold carcass weight, yield traits such as back fat thickness, longissimus muscle area, yield index or yield grade, or quality traits such as meat color, fat color, texture, maturity, marbling score, or quality grade. However, it improved good quality grade (1+ and 1++) appearance rates (60% for the control group vs 100% for the BF-based silage-fed groups). In conclusion, cheap BF-based silage could be successfully used as a good quality roughage source for beef cattle.