• 제목/요약/키워드: Ferry company

검색결과 13건 처리시간 0.019초

민간소비 이상징후에 대한 속보성 모형 구축 (Establishment of Quick Model for Private Consumption Symptom)

  • 안성희;이준기;하지은
    • 한국빅데이터학회지
    • /
    • 제2권1호
    • /
    • pp.59-69
    • /
    • 2017
  • 재난 경제학 분야의 선행연구는 대부분 뒤늦은 거시지표 또는 특정 업종에 국한된 분석형태이다. 재난 예방이 무엇보다 중요하지만, 재난 발생 즉시 파급되는 실시간 영향도 분석 및 그에 따른 재건 정책 또한 예방 못지 않은 중요한 분야이다. 본 연구는 카드사의 실시간 빅데이터를 활용한 사건 연구로 세월호 참사와 메르스 사태로 인한 민간소비의 파급효과를 분석하였으며 Marketing Mix Modeling 방법론의 Idea를 활용하였다. 분석 결과 세월호 참사는 3개월에 걸쳐 민간소비가 위축된 반면 메르스 사태는 비슷한 규모로 1개월동안 일시적인 급격한 민간소비 감소현상을 보이고, 바로 회복하는 모습을 보였다. 본 연구의 초점은 재난이 종료되지 않은 시점에서 속보성으로 피해규모가 파악이 가능한지 알아보고자 한 것이며 분석모형을 주간 단위로 설계하여 시점을 이동하면서 분석했을 경우 속보성 지표로도 의미가 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 향후 재난 또는 사건 발생시 본 연구가 직관적인 모니터링 지표로서의 초석이 되길 기대한다.

  • PDF

중대재해처벌법의 건설업 적용 문제점 및 대응방안 (Problems and Countermeasures in the Construction Industry Application of the Serious Accident Punishment Act)

  • 정중섭;서준혁;이동형
    • 산업경영시스템학회지
    • /
    • 제45권2호
    • /
    • pp.37-47
    • /
    • 2022
  • The Act on the Punishment of Serious Accidents to Prevent Large-scale Disasters, including Ferry Sewol and Taean Thermal Power Plant, passed the National Assembly on January 8, 2021, and has been in effect since January 27, 2022. However, the law, in which the representative of the headquarters is unlimitedly responsible for each worker's accident, is somewhat unreasonable at a time when a company owns dozens to hundreds of construction sites due to the nature of the construction industry. I agree with the purpose of enacting the law to reduce chronic serious accidents at construction sites, but it is necessary to carefully reconsider the implementation of the law in that punishment alone cannot achieve industrial safety. Previous studies focused on revising the Occupational Safety and Health Act, but there are few studies on the impact on the construction industry after the implementation of the Serious Accident Act. Therefore, this study attempts to derive problems related to the application of the Serious Accident Act and present improvement measures. To this end, after analyzing previous studies, SWOT analysis was performed by applying the Delphi method to derive strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. In addition, the results of two surveys of safety experts such as public institutions, academia, and companies were reflected, and its countermeasures were presented as follows. S/O strategy: establishing on-site execution capabilities of health and safety management system; W/O strategy: expanding legal and system execution checks; S/T strategy: establishing a risk response system; W/T strategy: expanding consulting by external specialized institutions

가습기살균제 참사의 진행과 교훈(Q&A) (Questions and Answers about the Humidifier Disinfectant Disaster as of February 2017)

  • 최예용
    • 한국환경보건학회지
    • /
    • 제43권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-22
    • /
    • 2017
  • 'The worstest environment disaster', 'World's first biocide massacre', 'Home-based Sewol ferry disaster' are all phrases attached to the recent humidifier disinfectant disaster. In the spring of 2011, four of 8 pregnant women including 1 adult man passed away at a university hospital in Seoul due to breathing failure. Epidemiologic investigation conducted by the Korean CDC soon revealed the inhalation of humidifier disinfectant, which had been widely used in Korea during the winter, to be responsible for the disease. As well as lung fibrosis hardening of the lungs, other diseases including asthma, rhinitis, skin disease, liver disease, fetal disease or cancers have been researched for their relation with exposure to the products. By February 9, 2017, 5,342 cases had registered for health problems and 1,131 of them were already dead (20.8% mortality rate). Based on studies by government agencies and a telephone survey of the general population by Seoul National University and civic groups, around 20% of the general public of Korea has used these products. Since the market release of the first product by SK Chemical in 1994, over 7.1 million items from around 20 brands were sold up to 2011. Most of the products were manufactured by well-known large conglomerates such as SK, Lotte, Samsung, Shinsegye, LG, and GS, as well as some European companies including UK-based Reckitt Benckiser and TESCO, the German firm Henkel, the Danish firm KeTox, and an Irish company. Even though this disaster was unveiled in 2011 by the Korean government, the issue of the victims was neglected for over five years. In 2016, an unexpected but intensive investigation by prosecutors found that Reckitt Benckiser manipulated and concealed animal tests for its own brand and brought several university experts and company employees to court. The matter was an intense social issue in Korea from May to June with a surge in media coverage. The prosecutor's investigation and a nationwide boycott campaign organized by victims and environmental groups against Reckitt Benckiser, whose product had been used by more than 70% of victims, led to the producer's official apology and a compensation scheme. A legislative investigation organized after the April 2016 national election revealed the producers' faults and the government's responsibility, but failed to meet expectations. A special law for the victims passed the National Assembly in January 2017 and a punitive system together with a massive environmental epidemiology investigation are expected to be the only solutions for this tragedy. Sciences of medicine, toxicology and environmental health have provided decisive evidence so far, but for the remaining problems the perspectives of social sciences such as sociology and jurisprudence are highly necessary, similar to with the Minamata disease and Wonjin Rayon events. It may not be easy to follow this issue using unfamiliar terminology from medical and chemical science and the long, complicated history of the event. For these reasons the author has attempted to write this article in a question and answer format to render it easier to follow. The 17 questions are: Q1 What is humidifier disinfectant? Q2 What kind of health problems are caused by humidifier disinfectant? Q3 How many victims are there? Q4 What is the analysis of the 1,112 cases of death? Q5 What is the problem with the government's diagnostic criteria and the solution? Q6 Who made what brands? Q7 Has there been a recall? What is still on sale? Q8 Was safety not checked by any producers? Q9 What are the government's responsibilities? Q10 Is it true that these products were sold only in Korea? Q11 Why and how was it unveiled only in 2011 after 17 years of sales? Q12 What delayed the resolution of the victim issue? Q13 What is the background of the prosecutor's investigation in early 2016? Q14 Is it possible to report new victim cases without evidence of product purchase? Q15 What is happening with the victim issue? Q16 How does it compare with the cases of Minamata disease and Wonjin Rayon? Q17 Are there prevention measures and lessons?