• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권10호
• /
• pp.6173-6180
• /
• 2013

Background: Our objective was to determine the knowledge and attitudes of Thai generalists (general physicians) toward palliative terminal cancer care (PC) in a primary care setting. Materials and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional descriptive survey using a self-administered questionnaire. The total number of completed and returned questionnaires was 63, giving a 56% response rate. Data analysis was based on these (Cronbach's alpha=0.82) and percentages and mean values were assessed using the Fisher's exact test to determine the correlation of variables. Results: Overall, attitude and knowledge levels were slightly satisfactory. Results indicated that general physicians had moderate scores in both attitudes (84.1%) and knowledge (55.7%) regarding palliative terminal cancer care. However, they had insufficient knowledge regarding truth telling, pain control and management with morphine, emergency management in terminal cancer care and treatment of fluid intake in terminal stages. Attitude and knowledge scores were statistically correlated (p=0.036). Knowledge scores were further positively associated with being taught palliative care in their medical curriculum (p=0.042). Conclusions: Formal education in palliative care and development of palliative care services are very much needed in Thailand to provide holistic care to terminally ill patients.

• Journal of Medicine and Life Science
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.80-83
• /
• 2019

First of all, this study shows the legal issues of hospice and palliative care, and the legal basis for lifelong medical practice is generally derived from medical, civil and criminal law regulations, and is applied to patients who are severely ill and dying in principle. In addition, those what is particularly meaningful about hospice and palliative care in terms of legal aspects are discussed the determination of the purpose of care and the provision of medical adaptability and adult guardianship, in particular the legal criteria for the work and status of patient representatives. As such, the purpose of care is to form part of the contract of care and to be agreed between the patient and the physician. In addition, the patient may not write to his/her agent in advance, and the patient may admit discretionary powers to his/her agent, but the patient's will is to be considered. In conclusion, the medical institutional ethics committee should play an active role, especially in the case of no-agents/family or no intention of the patient.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.89-99
• /
• 2022

The figures listed under the title of 'Photo Insert' in 『HanBangEuiYakGye』 No.2 are all those who were engaged in East Asian medicine, but they can be divided into several groups depending on the areas in which they were more focused. First, he served as a royal physician at the end of the Joseon Dynasty, or was an oriental medical doctor with outstanding medical skills during the family service. Second, he is an East Asian medicine doctor who established a school for Korean medicine education or conducted various academic activities. Third, he is an East Asian medical doctor who worked hard to lead a group of East Asian medical doctors by organizing Korean medical doctors. Looking at the reality of the oppression of ethnic medicine committed by the Japanese colonial government, they continued to seek a way to live in national medicine, which played a major role in continuing the existence of Korean medicine without destroying it. In this paper, we analyzed the 13 Korean medical doctors introduced in the "Photo Insertion" and examined the activities of modern and contemporary East Asian medical doctors.

• 농촌의학ㆍ지역보건
• /
• 제42권2호
• /
• pp.79-86
• /
• 2017

우울증과 대사증후군은 상호 연관성이 있으며, 영양소 섭취 상태가 두 질환의 발생과 예방에 영향을 미침에도 불구하고 대사증후군 환자를 대상으로 한 우울증 환자의 영양소 섭취 상태에 대한 연구가 국내는 물론 국외에서도 적은 편이다. 이에 본 연구는 국민건강영양조사에 참여한 대사증후군 환자를 대상으로 우울증과 영양소 섭취 상태의 연관성을 알아보고자 하였다. 본 연구는 국민건강영양조사 자료 중 제 6기 2차 (2014년) 자료를 분석하였으며, 만 20세에서 60세 사이의 대사증후군 환자 1.471명 중 의사에 의한 우울증 진단여부가 확인이 되는 1,334명을 최종 대상자로 하여 이들의 영양소 섭취 상태와 우울증과의 연관성을 분석하였다. 대사증후군 환자를 남녀로 구분하여 우울증 군과 정상 군의 영양소 섭취 상태를 비교하였을 때, 니아신 섭취량이 남성에서 각각 $14.5{\pm}6.7mg$과 $17.8{\pm}9.7mg$으로 우울증 군이 유의하게(P=0.047) 낮았고, 여성에서도 각각 $11.4{\pm}5.4mg$과 $13.1{\pm}8.0mg$으로 우울증 군이 유의하게(P=0.025) 낮았다. 결론적으로 본 연구에서는 대사증후군이 있는 성인에서 우울증이 니아신 섭취량과 관련이 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 이는 대사증후군 환자에서 우울증에 대한 영양소 섭취 상태 평가가 의미가 있음을 시사하며, 또한 영양학적 중재가 대사증후군 환자의 우울증 유병을 감소시킬 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.166-173
• /
• 2019

목적: 높은 수준의 호스피스 및 완화의료 교육은 한국 의과대학 교육과정에 필요하다. 하지만 이와 연관된 연구는 많지 않은 실정이며 이에 본 연구는 호스피스와 완화의료 교육 과정을 마친 의과 대학생의 호스피스와 완화의료에 대한 인지 및 태도 변화를 연구하기 위해 수행 되었다. 또한 의과대학의 기본 교육 과정 안에서 호스피스 교육과정의 역할에 대해서도 탐구하고자 한다. 방법: 호스피스와 완화의학에 대한 통합적인 교육과정을 마친 총 76명의 의학과 4학년 학생이 자기 기입 형태의 설문조사에 참여 하였다. 교육 과정을 마친 후 수업 전과 비교하여 수업 후의 후의 호스피스 및 완화의료에 대한 지식과 태도를 조사하였다. 결과: 교육 과정을 이수한 이후 가장 큰 변화는 호스피스 및 완화의료 세팅에서 적절한 마약성 진통제를 사용할 수 있는가 하는 부분에서 나타났다(3.50점 vs 5.32 점; P≤0.001). 수업 전과 비교하여 수업 이후 호스피스와 완화의료에 대한 태도를 나타내는 질문인 "나는 호스피스와 완화의료의 목표와 역할을 바르게 알고 있다"고 답한 학생은 17명(22.4%)에서 65명(85.6%)으로 증가하였다. 또한 "예비의사로서 나는 호스피스와 완화의료의 바른 적용 시점을 알고 있다"고 답한 학생은 수업 전의 22명(28.9%)과 비교하여 65명(85.6%)으로 증가하였다. 결론: 통합적인 호스피스 완화의료 교육과정은 의과 대학생의 호스피스 및 완화의료에 대한 인식과 태도를 긍정적인 방향으로 변화시킬 수 있다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.309-341
• /
• 2009

According to a case of Supreme Court's Sentence No. 2009DA17417 (May 21, 2009), the Supreme Court judges that 'the right to life is the ultimate one of basic human rights stipulated in the Constitution, so it is required to very limitedly and conservatively determine whether to discontinue any medical practice on which patient's life depends directly.' In addition, the Supreme Court admits that 'only if a patient who comes to a fatal phase before death due to attack of any irreversible disease may execute his or her right of self-determination based on human respect and values and human right to pursue happiness, it is permissible to discontinue life-sustaining treatment for him or her, unless there is any special circumstance.' Furthermore, the Supreme Court finds that 'if a patient who is attacked by any irreversible disease informs medical personnel of his or her intention to agree on the refusal or discontinuance of life-sustaining treatment in advance of his or her potential irreversible loss of consciousness, it is justifiable that he or she already executes the right of self-determination according to prior medical instructions, unless there is any special circumstance where it is reasonably concluded that his or her physician is changed after prior medical instructions for him or her.' The Supreme Court also finds that 'if a patient remains at irreversible loss of consciousness without any prior medical instruction, he or she cannot express his or her intentions at all, so it is rational and complying with social norms to admit possibility of estimating his or her own intentions on withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, provided that such a withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment meets his or her interests in view of his or her usual sense of values or beliefs and it is reasonably concluded that he or she could likely choose to discontinue life-sustaining treatment, even if he or she were given any chance to execute his or her right of self-determination.' This judgment is very significant in a sense that it suggests the reasonable orientation of solutions for issues posed concerning withdrawal of meaningless life-sustaining medical efforts. The issues concerning removal of medical instruments for meaningless life-sustaining treatment and discontinuance of such treatment in regard to medical treatment for terminal cases don't seem to be so much big deal when a patient has clear consciousness enough to express his or her intentions, but it counts that there is any issue regarding a patient who comes to irreversible loss of consciousness and cannot express his or her intentions. Therefore, it is required to develop an institutional instrument that allows relevant authority to estimate the scope of physician's medical duties for terminal patients as well as a patient's intentions to withdraw any meaningless treatment during his or her terminal phase involving loss of consciousness. However, Korean judicial authority has yet to clarify detailed cases where it is permissible to discontinue any life-sustaining treatment for a patient in accordance with his or her right of self-determination. In this context, it is inevitable and challenging to make better legislation to improve relevant systems concerning withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The State must assure the human basic rights for its citizens and needs to prepare a system to assure such basic rights through legislative efforts. In this sense, simply entrusting physician, patient or his or her family with any critical issue like the withdrawal of meaningless life-sustaining treatment, even without any reasonable standard established for such entrustment, means the neglect of official duties by the State. Nevertheless, this issue is not a matter that can be resolved simply by legislative efforts. In order for our society to accept judicial system for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, it is important to form a social consensus about this issue and also make proactive discussions on it from a variety of standpoints.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.58-67
• /
• 1995

이 연구는 3차 진료기관 응급실의 기능을 정상화하기 위한 기초 자료를 수집하기 위하여, 한 3차 진료기관 응급실을 방문한 환자를 대상으로, 입원 결정서 발부와 환자의 입원 결정 양상 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인을 파악하였다. 또한 적절성 평가 지침을 이용하여 응급실을 통한 입원의 적절성을 평가하였고 입원의 적절성과 응급실 입원 대기시간의 적절성에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하였다. 입원 결정서 발부에 영향을 미치는 요인은 환자의 내 외과계 구분, 진료과수, 환자 상태, 방문 경로, 방문 시간과 방문 요일이었다. 입원 결정서 발부 후 환자의 입원 여부는 환자의 성, 환자 상태, 방문 경로, 방문 요일에 따라 달리 나타났다. 환자의 연령, 내 외과계 구분과 방문 요일에 따라 입원의 적절성에 차이를 보였다. 입원 대기시간은 환자의 연령이 증가할수록 적절성이 낮았다. 이 연구를 통하여 응급실을 통한 입원 중 반수 이상의 입원이 부적절한 입원으로 평가되었고, 이 중 일부는 입원을 빨리 하기 위한 방법의 하나로 응급실을 편법으로 이용하고 있기 때문인 것으로 판단되었다. 또한 입원 결정서가 발부된 환자 중 상당수의 환자가 병상을 구할 수 없어 입원하지 못하고 있는 것으로 보아, 3차 진료기관의 환자 집중 현상과 응급실 과밀화 요인 해소를 위한 의료정책의 수립이 필요함을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국의료질향상학회지
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.96-108
• /
• 1994

Background: An appropriate use of hospital beds can improve productivity of hospital significantly. The authors' previous study revealed that approximately one third of Korean hospital bed days and one sixth of admissions were inappropriately used, when it was measured by Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol(AEP) and Delay Tool modified into Korean situation by the authors. This study aims to evaluate applicability of the instruments in a new hospital. More specifically the study aims to measure appropriateness of the instruments used by newly trained nurse reviewers at a new hospital setting. Methods: In order to evaluate applicability of these instruments, agreement rates of the scores recorded by newly trained nurse reviewers with by skilled nurse reviewer and also compared with the scores recorded by physician's implicit decision were assessed. Agreement rates were derived from concurrent application of AEP and Delay Tool to 52 admissions and 104 patient days from internal medicine, pediatrics, and general surgery of one university hospital. Overall agreement rate, specific nonacute agreement rate, and kappa statistics were used to indicate level of agreement. Results: Overall agreement rates on appropriateness between newly trained nurse reviewers and skilled nurse reviewer were 100% in admission and 98% in bed days. Overall agreement rates on reason for inappropriateness between newly trained nurse reviewers and skilled nurse reviewer were 96% in admission and 91% in bed days. Overall agreement rates between newly trained nurse reviewers and physician reviewer were 86% in admission and 87% in bed days. Conclusion: Results indicated that AEP and Delay Tool were applicable to a new hospital in detecting inappropriate utilization of beds and reasoning of the inappropriateness. These instruments could contribute to enhance efficiency of hospital use, through continuous monitoring of level of inappropriate hospital use at national or individual hospital level.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.1419-1424
• /
• 2012

Objectives: To investigate in depth the use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) by cancer patients at the end-of-life (EOL) and how they communicate with physicians about them. Design and location: In 17 hospitals in Korea between January and December 2004 we identified 4,042 families of cancer patients. Results: The prevalence of CAM use among cancer patients at the EOL was 37.0%, and 93.1% had used pharmacologic types of agents. The most frequent motive for CAM use was the recommendation of friends or a close relative (53.4%) or a physician (1.6%). Only 42.5% discussed CAM use with their physicians. Satisfaction with CAMS was recalled for 37.1%. The most common reason given for that satisfaction was improvement of emotional or physical well-being, while ineffectiveness was the most common reason given for dissatisfaction. The average cost of CAM during the last month of life was $US 900. CAM use was associated with longer disease periods, primary cancers other than liver, biliary, and pancreatic, and need of support from physicians or religion. Conclusions: CAM use among cancer patients at the EOL was common, not discussed with physicians, and associated with expectation of cure. Expectations were generally unmet while the treatments were a financial burden. Further studies evaluating the effects of CAM at the EOL and factors that enhance communication with the physician are needed.

• 문화기술의 융합
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.27-33
• /
• 2024

본 연구에서는 '조력존엄사'에 대한 부분을 살펴보며, 라몬이 소송을 통해서 아름답게 죽음을 맞이할 수 있는 권리는 자기에게 있다고 주장하는 모습에 대해 고찰하였다. 영화<씨 인사이드>의 주인공 라몬 삼페드로는 전신마비로 26년 이상을 침대에서 움직임도 없이 생활하고 있는 중증환자이다. 그가 할 수 있는 유일한 것은 가족들에게 말로 부탁하는 것이다. 라몬은 이러한 무가치한 삶을 더이상 지탱할 수 없기에 인간으로서 존엄하게 자신의 삶을 마치고 싶다는 열의로 '조력존엄사'를 추구하는 것이다. 라몬은 합법적인 틀안에서 조력존엄사를 허가받기 위해 소송을 제기하였지만 삶은 의무라는 이유로 기각당한다. 라몬은 결국 자신이 추구하고자 하는 조력존엄사를 자신의 친구들의 도움으로 행한다. 라몬은 자신의 죽음에 대한 과정을 기록으로 남기기 위해서 촬영을 위한 카메라를 설치하고, 조력존엄사에 사용하는 치사약인 청산가리를 소개하면서 담담하게 카메라 앞에서 청산가리를 흡입하면서 조용히 죽음을 맞이한다. 결국 라몬은 자신이 원했던 조력존엄사를 실행한 것이며 현재의 삶에서 해방된 것이다. 라몬이 비록 식물인간이나 임종을 앞둔 환자는 아니지만 자신의 결정으로 실행한 조력존엄사를 어느 누가 비난할 수 있겠는가. 우리는 라몬과 같은 중증환자들이 조력존엄사를 할 수 있도록 사회적인 공감을 얻어서 법제화할 수 있도록 노력해야 할 것이다.