• Title/Summary/Keyword: Family of Systems (FoS)

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.026 seconds

A Study on the Defense Key Interface Profiles Process for Improving Interoperability (상호운용성 향상을 위한 국방 KIP 프로세스에 관한 연구)

  • Park, H.K.;Jeong, C.K.
    • Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
    • /
    • v.35 no.3
    • /
    • pp.61-79
    • /
    • 2009
  • It is recognized that guaranteeing the interoperability of defense complex systems(SoS: System of Systems, FoS: Family of Systems) provides an information advantage, which is one of the essential factors for determining an warfighting advantage. This study presents the defense KIP(Key Interface Profile) process for improving interoperability of defense complex systems. The KIP process is to develop key interface profiles based on the key interfaces which are identified through the analysis of architecture. The KIP developed can be leveraged to manage the interfaces of complex systems. We verify the effectiveness of the proposed KIP process through a case study based on the systems of counter-fire operation.

Abstracted Meta-model for Effective Capabilities Portfolio Management (CPM)

  • Lee, Joongyoon;Yoon, Taehoon;Park, Youngwon
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Systems Engineering
    • /
    • v.7 no.1
    • /
    • pp.31-41
    • /
    • 2011
  • The purpose of this paper is to provide an abstracted meta-model for executing Capabilities Portfolio Management (CPM) effectively based on DoDAF2.0. The purpose of developing an architecture is for beneficial use of it. A good set of architectural artifacts facilitates the manipulation and use of them in meeting its usage objectives well. Systems engineering methodologies evolve to accommodate or to deal with enterprise or SoS/FoS level problems. And DoD's Capabilities Portfolio Management (CPM) is a good example which demonstrates enterprise or SoS level problems. However, the complexity of the architecture framework makes it difficult to develop and use the architecture models and their associated artifacts. DoDAF states that it was established to guide the development of architectures and to satisfy the demands of a structured, repeatable method for evaluating alternatives which add value to decisions and management practices. One of the objectives of DoDAF2.0 is to define concepts and models usable in CPM which is one of DoD's six core processes. However, DoDAF and various guidelines state requirements for CPM rather than how to. This paper provides methodology for CPM which includes process and tailored meta-models based on DoDAF Meta Model (DM2).