• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.751-758
• /
• 2021

군수품은 품질 보증을 위해 개발과 양산단계에서 위험 식별을 수행해야 한다. 위험 식별은 부품, 구성품, 계통 등에 대한 고장 요소를 분석하는 것으로, 다양한 신뢰성 기법 중에서 고장 모드 영향 분석(FMEA)을 이용하고 있다. FMEA는 위험 식별 중 고장 요인에 대하여 분석하는 방법으로, 위험도(RPN)를 통해 관리할 수 있다. FMEA는 심각도, 발생도, 검출도가 같은 중요도로 평가되기 때문에 단점을 가진다. 퍼지 FMEA는 FMEA의 단점을 보완하기 위해 퍼지이론을 이용한 것이다. 퍼지 이론은 현상의 불확실한 상태를 표현해주는 방법으로, 정량적인 값을 제공한다. 본 논문에서, 퍼지 FMEA는 회전익 항공기 착륙장치의 고장 모드에 대한 객관적인 평가를 위해 적용되었다. 착륙장치에 대한 위험도 분석을 위해, 퍼지 규칙과 소속 함수를 구성하였다. 퍼지화 모델은 심각도, 발생도, 검출도의 크리스프(crisp) 값을 이용하였고, 위험도를 도출하였다. 착륙장치에 대한 퍼지 FMEA 결과는 위험도와 우선순위를 분석할 수 있다. 퍼지 FMEA는 회전익 항공기의 품질 보증 활동에서 기초자료로 활용할 수 있음을 확인하였다.

• 한국신뢰성학회지:신뢰성응용연구
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.28-37
• /
• 2017

Purpose: This paper proposes a procedure that may infer and identify interaction failures in a module. Methods: In design FMEA, we defined an interaction model between components and proposed a method for selecting a single component by using the standard specification classification table and four methods for choosing the related components. We also introduced the function tree for function and requirement characteristic analysis and proposed utilization of standard stress lists and 1st and 2nd stress analysis tables to determine the effect the stress analysis has on interactions. Finally, the interaction mechanism diagram was proposed and used to infer the failure mechanism. Process FMEA also established procedures in a similar way. Results: We established a procedure for predicting the failure mode due to interaction between components based on Company A's multi-step FMEA procedure. Conclusion: By applying the proposed interaction FMEA procedure to the development model, we were able to confirm the effect of the new derivation on the failure mode of interaction, which was not predicted by the existing FMEA.

• 한국지능시스템학회논문지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.174-179
• /
• 2015

동적 위치제어 시스템(Dynamic Positioning System)의 위험성과 신뢰성 평가에 FMEA(Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)를 적용하고 있으나, 해양 프로젝트가 가진 특징으로 인해 다음과 같은 한계를 가진다. 1) SCADA(Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) 시스템을 통해 수집되는 고장 데이터의 일부는 환경의 영향으로 인한 오작동이나 단순한 센서고장으로 인해 생성되는 데이터를 포함하고 있으므로 불완전하고 신뢰할 수 없다. 따라서, FMEA의 세 가지 변수인 심각도(Severity), 발생빈도(Occurrence), 검출빈도(Detection)의 평가는 전문가 지식에 근거한다. 2) 전문가들의 주관적인 판단에 전적으로 의존할 경우 위험 요소들을 정밀하게 평가하기 어렵다. 3) 위험 요소들 사이의 상대적인 중요도는 고려되지 않아 위험우선순위가 명료하게 표현되지 않는다. 4) 서로 다른 고장모드에 대해 동일한 위험 우선순위 값을 가질 경우 상대적인 중요도를 판단하기 어렵다. 이러한 문제점을 극복하고 기존의 FMEA의 효과를 높이기 위해, Fuzzy-FMEA를 제안하고, 선박/해양 프로젝트의 동적 위치제어 시스템의 FMEA 문서에 적용하였다. 본 논문은 DP FMEA, DP FMEA 입증 시험서(DP FMEA Proving Trials)에 나타낸 전문가 지식을 퍼지 모델로 구현하여 FMEA 위험우선순위(RPN; Risk Priority Number)에 위험요소들의 상대적인 중요성을 포함시켰다. 제안한 방법은 해양 프로젝트의 동적 위치제어 시스템의 기계 및 전장 장비에 적용하여 기존의 FMEA와 비교하였다.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.87-100
• /
• 2014

Risk management is recognized as a significant element in Information Security Management while the failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is widely used in risk analysis in manufacturing industry. This paper aims to present the development work of the Information Security FMEA Circle (InfoSec FMEA Circle) which is used to support the risk management framework by modifying traditional FMEA methodologies. In order to demonstrate the "appropriateness" of the InfoSec FMEA Circle for the purposes of assessing information security, a case study at Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HKSTP) is employed. The "InfoSec FMEA Circle" is found to be an effective risk assessment methodology that has a significant contribution to providing a stepwise risk management implementation model for information security management.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2007

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a widely used technique to assess or to improve reliability of products at early stage of design and development. Traditionally, the prioritization of failures for corrective actions is performed by developing a risk priority number (RPN). In practice, due to insufficient evaluation criteria specific to related product and processes, RPN is not properly evaluated. This paper reestablishes an effective methodology for prioritization of failure modes in FMEA procedure. Revised evaluation criteria of RPN are devised and a refined FMEA sheet is Introduced. To verify the proposed methodology, it is applied to RPN evaluation for motors in household appliances.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.156-172
• /
• 1997

FMEA is a widely used technique to assess or to improve reliability of products at early stage of design and development. In order to implement FMEA effectively, it is important to utilize knowledge or technical know-hows. However, that is very difficult. In fact, if information on the failure modes is enough, it is important to consider a counterplan to eliminate critical failure modes. If engineers do not have such information, however, it is more important to know what failure modes of the component under consideration would undergo. This means that the purposes of performing FMEA varies according to the situation. Therefore, we need different kinds of FMEA charts to meet those purposes. This paper proposes two FMEA charts: one is suitable for detecting potential failure modes and the other is for product improvements.

• 대한영양사협회학술지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.25-36
• /
• 2015

In this study, we attempted to improve hospital food delivery service quality and customer satisfaction by using FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis), which is applied to the quality control of products in manufacturing plants. Subjective food delivery service quality improvement was judged based on a 5-point likert scale. Traditional FMEA uses an RPN (Risk priority number) to evaluate the risk level of a component or process. The RPN index was determined by calculating the product of severity, occurrence, and detection indexes. In our results, total RPN value (P<0.01) significantly decreased after FMEA introduction, whereas customer satisfaction (P<0.001) and food delivery service quality (P<0.001) significantly increased. Specifically, foodservice errors (P<0.01) and loss cost (P<0.01) were significantly improved by FMEA introduction. Taken together, we suggest that FMEA reduces critical activities and errors in foodservice delivery caused by simple priority selection.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.43-61
• /
• 2014

Purpose: This study identifies preventive measures for VOC management by analyzing the causes and effects of factors that contribute to high risk service failure using FMEA on KORAIL VOC data. Methods: Two research methods were used. First, a Risk Priority Number (RPN) was assigned to each KORAIL VOC based on Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA). Second, multiple regression analysis was run with RPN factors that include severity, occurrence, and detection as the independent variables and customer dissatisfaction as the dependent variable. Results: Multiple regression analysis showed that RPN factors including severity, occurrence, and detection had significantly positive relationship with customer dissatisfaction. Based on these results, an FMEA was performed on VOC categories with high RPN for railroad stations including platform, ticketing, ticket verification, parking, and escalator, and VOC categories with high RPN for trains including entrance doors, cafes, air quality, announcement, and ticket verification. Conclusion: This study has practical implications to service failure management. A priority order using FMEA was established for the list of customer dissatisfactions that should be addressed to actively manage service failure, and strategies for tackling this priority list are offered.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 2023

In this study, we aimed to identify the important hazard factors and determine their criticality in causing serious accidents in vehicle-mounted mobile elevated work platforms (MEWPs). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)was performed using accident data and a survey of experts. To determine the hazard factors, the accident data for the last 10 years were used and a questionnaire survey was designed. The questionnaire survey was sent to four experts in the field of occupational safety to determine the severity, occurrence, and detectability of serious accidents in MEWPs. Furthermore, objective RPN scores and risk priority were obtained using fuzzy FMEA. Finally, the criticality of hazard factors in descending order was found to be overloading, non-installation or defective installation of outriggers, breakage due to wire rope aging, and illegal remodeling of vehicle structures. The results were verified by comparing the occurrence data of serious disasters.

• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.177-186
• /
• 2014

FMEA는 실패로 인한 위험을 최소화하기위해 실패의 요인과 그로인한 영향을 사전에 평가하는 체계적인 방법이다. 이 방법은 제품의 신뢰도 문제를 해결하기 위해 제조산업 분야에서 주로 사용되어 왔으나, 서비스의 역할과 중요성이 커지면서 최근에는 이를 서비스의 신뢰도 문제에도 사용하고 있다. 하지만, 서비스에서는 고객이 서비스 전달 프로세스에 참여하며 고객마다의 이질성 등으로 인해 제조업을 위해 개발된 FMEA를 직접 사용할 수은 없다. 이러한 이유로 인해, FMEA를 서비스에 적용하기위한 여러 연구가 이루어지고 있다. 본 논문에서는, 심각도, 발생빈도, 검출력으로 우선순위를 평가하던 기존의 RPN 대신에, 서비스 특성을 고려하여 심각도, 발생빈도, 회복력 3가지로 평가하는 새로운 지수 S-RPN을 제시하였으며, 기존연구의 사례를 통해 제시된 방법의 효용성을 평가하였다.