• 대한지역사회영양학회지
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.361-370
• /
• 2001

This survey was conducted to evaluate with 457 health professionals from July, 1999 to September, 1999 the awareness of and satisfaction with the nutrition labeling system in Korea and to determine a desirable labeling system. Professors of food and nutrition and nutrition researchers in the food industry had the hightest scores on awareness of the nutrition labeling system(75.6% and 73.4%, respectively), which was significantly different from each other by occupation(p < 0.01). Frequently checked labeling information were expiration date, production date, price, and company respectively. Special nutrient food producers(56.9%), dietitians(49.3%), nurses(48.1%), researchers(42.3%) answered moderately on satisfaction with nutrition information for products, which was statistically significant(p < 0.01). This suggests that health professionals were unsatisfied with the present nutrition labeling system. In nutrition focusing statements, nutrient content claims, health claims, and working periods were significantly related with nutrition focusing statements and health claims, but not with nutrient content claims : the subject who had been working for more than 10 years and less than 5 years had positive thoughts or those matters while the subjects whose working periods were between 10 and 5 years had the lowest score. The most desirable labeling units were serving size(65.1%). Ninety two percent of the subjects wanted absolute nutrient contents in food and their percentage of the KRDA. Eight nine percent of health professionals agreed that the health claims should be used only with scientific approval by the government or food research institutions. Only 4.4% of subjects were satisfied with current regulations of health claims(p < 0.001). More studies regarding labeling units, their range and nutrient reference values are needed. The opinions of health professionals in nutrition labeling system should discussed to establish a desirable nutrition labeling system.

• 동아시아식생활학회지
• /
• 제6권3호
• /
• pp.335-344
• /
• 1996

This study was to investigate consumer recognition on food label of food package. The results of this study were as follows: 1. when shopping for food, the items considered the most were taste of family, food safety, nutrition and price, respectively. 2. 95.5% of respondents confirmed of the food label of food package when shopping for food. The items confirmed the most on food label were expiration date, manufacture date, manufacturer, food additives and nutrition, respectively. 3. 85.3% of respondents did not satisfy on the food label of food label of food package. 43.6% of respondents demanded food additives more detailed. 28.2% of respondents demanded nutrition information more detailed. 28.2% of respondents demanded food function more detailed. 4. The food which respondents satisfied on food label most were snack '||'&'||' cookies, nuddle, spices, can '||'&'||' bottled food, instant food, processed meat foo, frozen food and imported food, respectively. 5. The group with the most hphrases falling in the top rank was nutrition/calories. The phrases in the nutrition/calories group scored in the top rank were 3 "positive" nutritional characteristics(addition of vitamins, addition of DHA, high dietary fiber) and 5 "nagative" nutritional characteristics(no sugar, low sugar, low calories, low salt and low cholesterol). The group with the most phrases falling in the third rank was ingredient. The phrases in the ingredient scored in the third rank were add of food additives. 6. 55.5% of respondents did not know Recommended Daily Allowance(RDA) information and 61.9% of respondents did not understand the nutrition declaration(content) of food package but 65.7% of resspondents understood the nutrition claim of food package. From these result, respondents were more affected by nutrition claim than by nutrition declaration on food package when shopping for food.ood.

• 한국식품조리과학회지
• /
• 제25권6호
• /
• pp.643-649
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to assess the prospective teachers' perception of food risk with the goal of providing the ways to improve their knowledge and perception of food risk. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and offered to 307 freshman and sophomore in an elementary teacher-cultivating university located in Seoul. The collected data were analyzed in terms of frequencies, cross tabulation analysis, t-test and ANONA with a deviation level of 5% using SPSS 15.0. The results of this research were as follows: 'Taste' was identified as an important factor for purchasing food (54.4%), and 'Manufacture date/expiration date' (67.0%) was checked first before food was purchased. The respondants viewed food additives (66.8%) followed by environmental contaminants (17.6%) as the most dangerous factors for food consumption. Even though they did not know the actual level of risk these factors posed to food, they still perceived them as dangerous. Most of them did not have any educational experiences on food risk, and if any, their sources of information were TV (46.6%) and the internet (19.5%). And, they did want to have information on food risk through TV, radio (41.1%) and the internet(16.4%). Based on the above results, the subjects who have great potential to influence children appeared not to have sound knowledge or a balanced perception of food risks. Therefore, systematic educational opportunities for prospective teachers should be provided to promote food risk communication.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권8호
• /
• pp.371-376
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 효율적인 정보전달을 위한 편의점 도시락 레이블에 관한 연구로써, 구매자들이 원하는 정보의 중요도를 파악해 도시락 구매 시 구매자들에게 도움을 줄 수 있는 레이블을 정립하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 연구방법으로는 문헌 연구와 설문조사를 통해 구매자들이 도시락을 구매할 때 중요하게 생각하는 요소와 레이블에서 확인하는 정보 및 그 정보들의 중요도 순서를 분석하였다. 연구결과 도시락 구매자들이 중요하다고 생각되는 레이블 정보는 가격, 유통기한, 칼로리, 도시락 구성요소, 제조일자 순으로 나타났다. 또한, 레이블을 확인하지 않는 구매자들은 가독성이 떨어지는 레이블을 지적했다. 본 연구는 구매자들이 중요하다고 생각하는 정보들을 레이블에 새롭게 정립한다면 구매자들이 레이블을 통해 쉽게 정보를 확인하고 구매할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국식품조리과학회지
• /
• 제18권5호
• /
• pp.482-486
• /
• 2002

식품표시에 관한 소비자 교육 자료를 개발하여 대학생을 대상으로 소비자 교육을 실시한 다음, 소비자 교육의 효과는 설문지법으로 검토하였다. 식품표시의 정의, 목적, 법적 규정에 대해 올바르게 인식하고 있는 응답자의 비율은 소비자 교육을 실시한 후에 6.5-9.7% 정도 증가하였으나 유의적 차이는 보이지 않았다. 유통기한에 대해서는 '판매할 수 있는 최종일'로서 바르게 답한 응답자는 교육 후에 16.7%정도 증가되었으며, '유통기한이 지난 식품은 반드시 먹을 수 없다'고 답한 응답자가 교육 실시 후에 26.8% 증가되었다. 표기해야 하는 원재료명의 수(p＜0.01)와 표기 순서(p＜0.001)에 대한 응답은 교육 전과 교육 후에 유의적 차이를 보였다. 원재료명의 수에 대한 질문인 '모든 원재명을 표기해야 한다'에 대해 '아니오'라고 답한 응답자는 교육 후에 48.5%로 크게 증가되었고, 원재료명의 표시순서에 대한 질문인 '가장 먼저 표시된 원재료명은 가장 적게 사용된 것이다'에 대해 '아니오'라고 답한 응답자는 교육 후에 0.6% 증가되었다. 한편 원재료 중 식품 첨가물의 표시방법과 사용 이유에 관한 응답은 교육 전과 교육 후에 유의적 차이를 나타내었다(p＜0.001). 식품 첨가물의 표시방법에 관한 질문인 '식품 첨가물은 성분 또는 원재료명과 구별없이 표시하고 있다'에 대해 '예'라고 바르게 답한 응답자는 교육 후에 42.0% 증가되었다. 식품 첨가물의 사용 이유에 관한 질문에 대해 바르게 답한 응답자는 교육 후에 10.5% 증가되었다. 이와 같이 대부분의 문항에서 교육 효과를 볼 수 있었으며, 특히 식품 첨가물의 표시방법에 대한 교육 효과가 가장 좋게 나타났다. 한편 유통기한의 정의는 바르게 이해하고 있었으나 유통기한이 지난 식품은 반드시 먹을 수 없다고 답한 응답자 교육 후에 상당히 증가하여 유통기한의 활용에 대한 보다 철저한 소비자 교육이 필요하다고 생각된다.

• Preventive Nutrition and Food Science
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.74-80
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study was to investigate culinary arts and hospitality students' food safety practice behaviors, intentions, attitudes, and barriers to food safety compliance. This descriptive study used the self-report questionnaire. The convenience sample was composed of 266 college students majoring in culinary arts and hospitality. The students indicated that they never or rarely use a thermometer to determine if meats have been adequately cooked. Examples of positive food handling behaviors were hand washing, sanitation of fruits and vegetables, discarding of food past its expiration date, counter top sanitation, and proper food storage. Students strongly agreed it is their responsibility to practice food safety and to educate their employees about food safety. The primary barrier to proper food safety as ranked by student respondents is the misunderstanding about food labeling. Previous food safety education and internship experience appeared to improve the student respondents' perceived attitudes toward following the principles of food safety practices (p < 0.05), although behaviors and intentions to use the correct food safety practices were not affected. The findings of this study suggest that programs should consider integrating information and experiential learning opportunities in their courses that would be enhance student understanding about food safety. The outcomes of this study can be applied to develop food safety education materials and programs for culinary arts and hospitality students.

• Preventive Nutrition and Food Science
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.71-77
• /
• 2012

Hangwa is a traditional food, corresponding to the current consumption trend, in need of marketing strategies to extend its consumption. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze consumers’ consumption patterns and perception of Hangwa to increase consumption in the market. A questionnaire was sent to 250 consumers by e-mail from Oct 8~23, 2009 and the data from 231 persons were analyzed in this study. Statistical, descriptive, paired samples t-test, and importance-performance analyses were conducted using SPSS WIN 17.0. According to the results, Hangwa was purchased mainly 'for present' (39.8%) and the main reasons for buying it were 'traditional image' (33.3%) and 'taste' (22.5%). When importance and performance of attributes considered in purchasing Hangwa were evaluated, performance was assessed to be lower than importance for all attributes. The attributes in the first quadrant with a high importance and a high performance were ‘a sanitary process’, ‘a rigorous quality mark’ and ‘taste’, which were related with quality of the products. In addition, those with a high importance but a low performance were ‘popularization through advertisement’, ‘promotion through mass media’, ‘conversion of thought on traditional foods’, ‘a reasonable price’ and ‘a wide range of price’. In conclusion, Hangwa manufacturers need to diversify products and extend the expiration date based on technologies to promote its consumption. In terms of price, Hangwa should become more available by lowering the price barrier for consumers who are sensitive to price.

• 한국가금학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.193-205
• /
• 2001

The most prevailing consumption pattern of chicken was "Buy fresh and cook at home (79.8%)". The frequency of eating chicken dish was about "Twice a month". Total average of degree of Preference is "2.30". It is very much close to "Like (2.0)" rather than "Average (3.0)". The degree of preference of chicken decrease as the age increase. About 30% of the housewives have the experience of buying chicken "Cut-up". But "Whole chicken (79.7%)" was still used mostly for chicken dish at home. As the education background improves or living expense increases, housewives purchase chicken "Cup-up" more frequently. The major criteria in purchasing chicken was "Hygiene (67.4%)""Quality (55.2%), "Expiration date (36.7%)" follows next. The groups of ′Above 50 years′, ′Graduate school′ and ′More than 3 million won′show greater interest about "Health" than any other groups. Major chicken dish at home in Korea was "Chopped hot chicken (70.7%)". "Boiled chicken soup (43.2%) \" and "Ginseng chicken soup (39.3%)" follows next. "Order for delivery (57.4%)" increased rapidly for chicken consumption. Croup of ′20~30 years′ order chickens for delivery more frequently than other groups. But as the age of housewives increases, they cook at home more frequently. The most preferred chicken dish for dining-out were "Fried chicken (69.4%)" and "Spicy chicken (57.4%)". The preference of Korean traditional dish for dining out was decreasing except "Chuncheon chicken rib (14.2%)".2%)".

• 한국생활과학회지
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.711-721
• /
• 2013

This survey was conducted to compare food habit and food service satisfaction of high school students in urban and rural areas. The questionnaires were collected from 130 students in Daejeon and 140 in Geumsan. 19.8% of students skipped breakfast because of no time(48.7%), just habit(28.2%), no appetite(20.5%), for weight control(2.6%). The dietary behavior of rural students was better than city in taking snacks and light meal(p<0.05). For health they concerned highly about nutrition label expiration date of processed foods(72.3%) and least in considering nutrition than taste & price(37.9%). The satisfaction of food served was highest in nutrition(3.31), and taste(3.28), smell (3.23), color(3.03), temperature(3.02). The food service satisfaction of rural students was higher than city in proper temperature(p<0.001), nutrition(p<0.01), color(p<0.001). The satisfaction of rural students was higher than city in quantity of bap & side dishes, quality of food materials(p<0.001). The satisfaction of rural students was higher than city in convenience of dining hall, rapidity of food distribution, offer of nutrition information, sanitation of utensils & meals(p<0.001). It is suggested that school dietitian in city should be more concerned about sanitary food service based on students' dietary life & preference.

• 디지털콘텐츠학회 논문지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 인터넷에서 사용하는 주문형 전자카드 서비스 방법 및 시스템설계에 관한 것으로, 사용자의 신용카드번호, 선불카드번호, 은행계좌 등을 포함하는 신용정보를 입력받는 단계부터 시작하여 주문형 전자카드의 승인여부, 거래대금지불승인여부를 거쳐, 지급단계까지의 서비스를 시스템에 관한 연구이다. 이는 사용자가 전자카드의 사용한도. 사용횟수, 유효기간, 충전가능 여부 익명사용여부 등을 사용하고자 하는 거래 형태에 맞추어 직접 설계할 수 있으므로 사용자의 편의성을 보다. 증진시킬 수 있다. 또한 사용자의 설계범위 내에서만 결제가 이루어지므로 카드번호의 분실시에도 그 피해를 설계범위내로 최소화할 수 있다.