• 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한기계학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회논문집B
• /
• pp.962-969
• /
• 2000

Quality that character of energy is the same at every state in case of equal working fluid and net concept of material flow was applied to thermoeconomics about energy system, and we could naturally explain the suitable degree about this concept, also thermoecomic equations about general power plant was easily deduced. And deduced equations exactly corresponded with principle of thermoeconomics that overall input cost flow rate equal overall output cost flow rate. This equations is applied to gas turbine cogeneration power plant as one example and found the product unit cost. Also this product cost comparison could been naturally explained.

• 설비공학논문집
• /
• 제17권6호
• /
• pp.560-568
• /
• 2005

The cost accounting of electricity and heat produced from an energy system is important in evaluating the economical efficiency and deciding the reasonable sale price. The OECOPC method, suggested by the author, was applied to a 650 MW combined cycle cogeneration system having 4 operating modes, and each unit cost of electricity and heat products was calculated. In case that a fuel cost is ${\\}400/kg$ and there are no direct and indirect cost, they were calculated as follows; electricity cost of ${\\}23,700/GJ$ at gas-turbine mode, electricity cost of ${\\}15,890/GJ$ at combined cycle mode, electricity cost of ${\\}14,146/GJ$ and heat cost of ${\\}6,466/GJ$ at cogeneration mode, and electricity cost of ${\\}14,387/GJ$ and heat cost of ${\\}4,421/GJ$ at combined cycle cogeneration mode. Further, these unit costs are applied to account benefit on this system. Since the suggested OECOPC method can be applied to any energy system, it is expected to contribute to cost accounting of various energy systems.

• 대한설비공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한설비공학회 2009년도 하계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.315-320
• /
• 2009

Thermoeconomics or exergoeconomics can be classified into the three fields of cost estimating, cost optimization, and internal cost analysis. The objective of cost estimating is to estimate each unit cost of product and allocate each cost flow of product such as electricity or hot water. The objective of optimization is to minimize the input costs of capital and energy resource or maximize the output costs of products under the given constraints. The objective of internal cost analysis is to find out the cost formation process and calculate the amount of cost flow at each state, each component, and overall system. In this study, a new thermoeconomic methodology was proposed in the three fields. The proposed methodology is very simple and obvious. That is, the equation is only each one, and there are no auxiliary equations. Any energy including enthalpy and exergy can be applied and evaluated by this equation. As a new field, the cost allocation methodology on cool air or hot air produced from an air-condition system was proposed. Extending this concept, the proposed methodology can be applied to any complex system.

• Korean Chemical Engineering Research
• /
• 제59권1호
• /
• pp.60-67
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 CO2 포집을 포함하는 500 MWe 급 전기를 생산하는 순산소 석탄화력발전소에 대한 공정흐름도를 제시하였고, 기술경제성 평가를 수행하였다. 이 석탄화력발전소는 순환 유동층 보일러(CFB), 초초 임계 증기 사이클 증기 터빈, 보일러에서 배출되는 배기가스내 수분과 오염물질을 제거하는 배기가스 정제 장치(FGC), 산소 분리 초저온 공정(ASU), 이산화탄소를 분리하는 극저온 공정(CPU)을 포함한다. 건식 배기가스 재순환(FGR)은 CFB연소기내 온도 제어와 고농도 CO2 배출을 위하여 사용되었다. 이 순산소 석탄화력발전소의 열효율을 증가시키기 위하여 FGR 흐름에 대한 열교환, ASU에서 배출되는 질소 흐름에 대한 열교환, 그리고 CPU 내 기체 압축기의 열 회수를 고려하였다. FGR열교환기의 온도차(ΔT)의 감소는 배기가스의 더 많은 폐열 회수를 의미하며, 전기 및 엑서지 효율을 증가시켰다. FGR열교환기의 ΔT가 10 ℃ 에서 FGR과 FGC 주변의 연간 비용이 최소가 되었다. 이때, 전기 효율은 39%, 총투자비는 1371 M$, 총생산비용은 90 M$, 그리고 투자수익률은 7%/y, 그리고 투자회수기간은 12년으로 예측되었다. 본 연구를 통하여 순산소 석탄화력발전소의 열효율 향상을 위한 열교환망이 제시되었고, FGR 열교환기의 최적 운전 조건이 도출되었다.

• 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한기계학회 2001년도 춘계학술대회논문집D
• /
• pp.689-696
• /
• 2001

Exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis were performed for a 200kW Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell(PAFC) plant which offers many advantage for cogeneration in the aspect of high electrical efficiency and low emission. This analytical study was based on the data obtained by in-field measurement of PC25 fuel cell plant to find whether this system is viable economically. For 100% load condition, the electrical efficiency and the unit cost of electricity are about 45% and 0.032 $/kWh respectively, which turn out to be much better than those for the 1000kW gas turbine cogeneration plant. Further, at lower loads, the unit costs of electricity and hot water increase slightly and consequently more economic operation is possible at any loads.

• 플랜트 저널
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.36-40
• /
• 2016

발전소 건설시 성능감소에 따른 페널티 책정은 발주처와 건설사의 계약서에 서명되며, 그 페널티 책정 방법론은 발주처와 건설사의 손익과 관련되어 있으므로 모두가 인정할 수 있도록 합리적이어야 한다. 따라서 페널티 책정 방법론은 매우 중요하다. 열병합발전은 전기와 열을 동시에 생산하는 시스템이므로, 열병합발전의 페널티 책정 방법론은 명확하지 않다. 열경제학은 다양한 에너지 비용을 산정하는 학문이나, 지금까지 페널티 책정 방법론에 대해 연구된 바 없다. 본 연구의 목적은 열경제학이 성능인수시험의 페널티 책정 방법론에 적용될 수 있음을 예시하는 것이다. CGAM 시스템의 해석결과 $10,000,000의 건설비용이 투입되었을 경우, $6,665,688이 전기생산 성능비용으로 책정되었고, $3,334,312이 배기가스 성능비용으로 책정되었다. 따라서 만약 전기생산 성능이 1% 감소하였다면 그 페널티는 $6,666 그리고 배기가스 에너지 성능이 1% 감소하였다면 그 페널티는 $3,334로 책정됨을 알 수 있다.

• 플랜트 저널
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.32-36
• /
• 2016

본 연구에서는 CGAM 인수성능에 대한 페널티 비용 책정 방법론이 제안되어 있다. CGAM 성능시험결과 전기생산량에서 0.33% 감소, 전기생산효율에서 0.37% 감소, 열생산량에서 0.35% 증가, 열생산효율에서 0.31% 증가하였다. 페널티비용 책정 결과 전기생산량에서 -$22,138, 전기생산효율에서 -$24,348, 열생산량에서 +$11,661, 열생산효율에서 +$10,451로 산정되었다. 위 4 종류의 페널티 산정 계산은 명확하나, 총 페널티 비용은 위 4 종류를 어떻게 조합하는 가에 따라 달라진다. 계산결과 최대 -$46,486부터 -$13,898 범위였다. 따라서 총 페널티 정의에 대한 발주처와 건설사의 협의는 매우 중요하다는 것을 알 수 있다.

• 한국수소및신에너지학회논문집
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.21-28
• /
• 2019

Reversible solid oxide fuel cell (ReSOC) system was integrated with waste steam for electrical energy storage in distributed energy storage application. Waste steam was utilized as external heat in SOEC mode for higher hydrogen production efficiency. Three system configurations were analyzed to evaluate techno-economic performance. The first system is a simple configuration to minimize the cost of balance of plant. The second system is the more complicated configuration with heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). The third system is featured with HRSG and fuel recirculation by blower. Lumped models were used for system performance analyses. The ReSOC stack was characterized by applying area specific resistance value at fixed operating pressure and temperature. In economical assessment, the levelized costs of energy storage (LCOS) were calculated for three system configurations based on capital investment. The system lifetime was assumed 20 years with ReSOC stack replaced every 5 years, inflation rate of 2%, and capacity factor of 80%. The results showed that the exergy round-trip efficiency of system 1, 2, 3 were 47.9%, 48.8%, and 52.8% respectively. The high round-trip efficiency of third system compared to others is attributed to the remarkable reduction in steam requirement and hydrogen compression power owning to fuel recirculation. The result from economic calculation showed that the LCOS values of system 1, 2, 3 were 3.46 ¢/kWh, 3.43 ¢/kWh, and 3.14 ¢/kWh, respectively. Even though the systems 2 and 3 have expensive HRSG, they showed higher round-trip efficiencies and significant reduction in boiler and hydrogen compressor cost.