• 제목/요약/키워드: Exergy cost

검색결과 18건 처리시간 0.023초

열병합발전에서 비용배분 방법론의 합리성 검토 (Rationality Review of Cost Allocation Methodology at CHP)

  • 김덕진;최병렬
    • 에너지공학
    • /
    • 제29권2호
    • /
    • pp.40-60
    • /
    • 2020
  • 단일 에너지 시스템으로부터 다양한 종류의 제품이 생산될 때, 공통비를 각 제품으로 배분하는 방법론은 생산자와 구매자의 손익과 직접적으로 관련되기 때문에 매우 중요하다. 열병합발전에서 전기와 열의 비용배분 방법론에는 Heat 방법, Work 방법, Benefit distribution 방법, Exergy 방법 등이 있다. 전 세계적으로 Benefit distribution 방법이 가장 많이 알려져 있고, Exergy 방법은 열공학자들 사이에서 크게 인정받고 있다. 검토 결과 Benefit distribution 방법은 일반 상식과 어긋나는 결과가 도출되어 합리성이 낮고, Exergy 방법은 일반 상식과 일치하는 결과가 도출되어 합리성이 높다고 판단된다. 회계학에서는 메리트 방법론으로 계산하여 그 결과를 생산자와 구매자 간의 협상에 활용하고 있으나, 열공학에서는 엑서지 방법론의 합리성을 논문으로만 서술하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 메리트 방법론과 엑서지 방법론의 합리성을 비교 검토하는 데 있으며, 생산자와 구매자가 각 방법론의 합리성을 이해할 수 있도록 세부적으로 서술하고자 한다.

엑서지 단가를 각 작동유체별로 나눈 열경제학 (CGAM 문제해석) (Thermoeconomics to divided the energetic cost into each working fluid (CGAM problem analysis))

  • 김덕봉;김덕진
    • 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한기계학회 2000년도 추계학술대회논문집B
    • /
    • pp.222-227
    • /
    • 2000
  • At representative thermoeconomic theory to determine the unit cost of multiple products, there are the $\ulcorner$SPECO$\lrcorner$ method of Tsatsaronis's study group and the $\ulcorner$MOPSA$\lrcorner$ method of chung-ang university phase laboratory. Against this theory, we propose new theory called $\ulcorner$Thermoeconomics to divide the exergetic cost into each working fluid$\lrcorner$ in this study. Also, we apply new thermoeconomic theory to CGAM problem (30MW-grade imaginary gas turbine cogeneration power plant) that it is representative power system in thermoeconomics theory, and we fixed to interpreted the unit cost of electricity on the part of gas turbine and the unit cost of steam exergy(enthalpy) on the part of HRSG.

  • PDF

통합적 엑서지에 의한 발전 플랜트의 열경제학적 해석 (Thermoeconomic Analysis of Power Plants with Integrated Exergy Stream)

  • 김덕진;이현수;곽호영
    • 대한기계학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한기계학회 2000년도 춘계학술대회논문집B
    • /
    • pp.871-878
    • /
    • 2000
  • Exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis were performed for a 500-MW combined cycle plant and a 137-MW steam power plant without decomposition of exergy stream of matter into thermal and mechanical exergies. The calculated costs of electricity are almost same within 0.5% as those obtained by the thermoeconomic method with decomposition of exergy into thermal and mechanical exergies of the combined cycle plant. However for the gas-turbine cogeneration plant having different kinds of products. the difference in the unit costs of products, obtained from the two methodologies is about 2%. Such outcome indicates that the level at which the cost balances are formulated does not affect the result of thermoeconomic analysis, that is somewhat contradictory to that concluded previously.

  • PDF

Exergetic design and analysis of a nuclear SMR reactor tetrageneration (combined water, heat, power, and chemicals) with designed PCM energy storage and a CO2 gas turbine inner cycle

  • Norouzi, Nima;Fani, Maryam;Talebi, Saeed
    • Nuclear Engineering and Technology
    • /
    • 제53권2호
    • /
    • pp.677-687
    • /
    • 2021
  • The tendency to renewables is one of the consequences of changing attitudes towards energy issues. As a result, solar energy, which is the leader among renewable energies based on availability and potential, plays a crucial role in full filing global needs. Significant problems with the solar thermal power plants (STPP) are the operation time, which is limited by daylight and is approximately half of the power plants with fossil fuels, and the capital cost. Exergy analysis survey of STPP hybrid with PCM storage carried out using Engineering Equation Solver (EES) program with genetic algorithm (GA) for three different scenarios, based on eight decision variables, which led us to decrease final product cost (electricity) in optimized scenario up to 30% compare to base case scenario from 28.99 $/kWh to 20.27 $/kWh for the case study. Also, in the optimal third scenario of this plant, the inner carbon dioxide gas cycle produces 1200 kW power with a thermal efficiency of 59% and also 1000 m3/h water with an exergy efficiency of 23.4% and 79.70 kg/h with an overall exergy efficiency of 34% is produced in the tetrageneration plant.

에너지 시스템에 대한 전력 및 열 비용산정 (Suggestion of Power and Heat Costing for an Energy System)

  • 김덕진
    • 설비공학논문집
    • /
    • 제15권5호
    • /
    • pp.360-371
    • /
    • 2003
  • The calculation of each unit cost of productions is very important for evaluating the economical efficiency and deciding the reasonable sale price. In the present, two methods of exergy costing on multiple energy systems are suggested to reduce the complexities of conventional SPECO method and MOPSA method and to improve the calculation efficiency of exergoeconomics. The suggested methods were applied to a gas-turbine cogeneration and the unit costs of the power and the steam energy were calculated as an example. The main points of our methods are the following three. First, one exergetic cost is applied to one cycle or system. Second, the suggested equations are the internal cost balance equation and the production cost balance equation. Third, necessary states in a system are only inlet and exit states of 1ha components producing energy.

증기터빈 열병합발전에서 열과 전기의 비용배분 (Cost Allocation of Heat and Electricity on a Steam-Turbine Cogeneration)

  • 김덕진
    • 설비공학논문집
    • /
    • 제20권9호
    • /
    • pp.624-630
    • /
    • 2008
  • When various kinds of outputs are produced from a single energy system, the methodology which allocates the common cost to each output cost is very important because it is directly related with the profit and loss of producers and purchasers. In the cost allocation methodology of the heat and the electricity on a cogeneration, there are energy method, work method, proportional method, benefit distribution method, exergetic methods, and so on. On the other hand, we have proposed a worth method which can be applied to any system. The definition of this methodology is that the unit cost of a product is proportion to the worth. Where, worth is a certain evaluating basis that can equalize the worth of products. In this study, we applied worth method to a steam-turbine cogeneration which produces 22.2 MW of electricity and 44.4 Gcal/h of heat, and then we allocated 2,578 $/h of common cost to electricity cost and heat cost. Also, we compared with various cost allocation methods. As the result, we conclude that exergy of various kinds of worth basis evaluates the worth of heat and electricity most reasonably on this system.

가스터빈 열병합발전에서 생산된 열과 전기의 원가산정 (Cost Estimating of Heat and Electricity on a Gas-Turbine Cogeneration)

  • 김덕진
    • 대한설비공학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 대한설비공학회 2008년도 동계학술발표대회 논문집
    • /
    • pp.351-356
    • /
    • 2008
  • When various kinds of outputs are produced from a single energy system, the methodology which allocates the common cost to each output cost is very important because it is directly related with the profit and loss of producers and purchasers. In the cost allocation methodology of the heat and the electricity on a cogeneration, there are energy method, work method, proportional method, benefit distribution method, various exergetic methods, and so on. On the other hand, we have proposed a worth evaluation method which can be applied to any system. The definition of this methodology is that the unit cost of a product is proportion to the worth. Where, worth is a certain evaluating basis that can equalize the worth of products. In this study, we applied this methodology to a gas-turbine cogeneration which produces 119.2 GJ/h of electricity and 134.7 GJ/h of heat, and then we allocated 3,150 $/h of fuel cost to electricity cost and heat cost. Also, we compared with various cost allocation methods. As the result, we conclude that exergy of various kinds of worth basis evaluates the worth of heat and electricity most reasonably on this system.

  • PDF

스팀 동력 플랜트의 엑서지 및 열경제학적 해석 (Exergetic and Thermoeconomic Analysis of Steam Power Plant)

  • 김덕진;정정열;곽호영
    • 대한기계학회논문집B
    • /
    • 제27권1호
    • /
    • pp.76-83
    • /
    • 2003
  • Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses were performed fer a 137-MW steam power plant. In these analyses, mass and energy conservation laws were applied to each component of the system. Quantitative balance of the exergy and exergetic cost for each component, and for the whole system was carefully considered. The exergo-economic model, which represented the productive structure of the system was used to visualize the cost formation process and the productive interaction between components. The computer program developed in this study can determine production costs of power plants, such as gas-and steam-turbines plants and gas-turbine cogeneration plants. The program can also be used to study plant characteristics, namely, thermodynamic performance and sensitivity to changes in process and/or component design variables.

순산소 연소를 위한 초저온 공기분리장치의 엑서지 분석 (Exergy Analysis of Cryogenic Air Separation Unit for Oxy-fuel Combustion)

  • 최형철;문흥만;조정호
    • 한국가스학회지
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.27-35
    • /
    • 2019
  • 지구 온난화 문제 해결과 온실가스 감축을 위해 순산소 연소를 통한 $CO_2$ 포집기술이 개발되었으나, 산소 생산비용이 높아 경제성이 떨어지는 문제를 가지고 있다. 순산소 연소에 필요한 대량의 산소 생산은 초저온 공기분리장치(ASU: Air Separation Unit)가 가장 적합한 방법으로 산소 생산 비용 절감을 위해 ASU의 효율을 높이는 것이 필요하다. ASU의 효율 향상을 위해서는 현재 공정의 효율 평가 및 에너지 소비 형태를 확인해야 하며, 이를 위해 엑서지 분석이 사용될 수 있다. 엑서지 분석은 공정에서 사용된 에너지의 정보, 에너지 손실의 위치, 크기 등을 확인 시켜주며, 에너지 손실을 최소화 할 수 있는 공정 최적화를 가능하게 해준다. 본 연구에서는 초대형 규모의 ASU 공정개발 및 최적화를 위해 엑서지 분석을 이용하였다. ASU의 공정모사를 수행하고 그 결과를 바탕으로 엑서지 값을 계산하였다. 그 결과 ASU의 cold box에서 엑서지 손실을 줄이기 위해 운전압력을 낮추는 방법을 제안하였고, cold box의 열침입 및 열손실 감소의 필요성을 확인하였다. 또한 ASU의 단위 공정 중 다른 공정과 열통합이 필요한 위치를 확인 하였다.

복합열병합 발전에 대한 전기 및 열 원가산정 (Cost Accounting of Electricity and Heat on Combined Cycle Cogeneration)

  • 김덕진;이근휘
    • 설비공학논문집
    • /
    • 제16권7호
    • /
    • pp.673-682
    • /
    • 2004
  • The cost accounting of products on energy system is important for evaluating the economical efficiency and deciding the reasonable sale price. In the present, the suggested OECOPC method was applied to a combined cycle cogeneration, and each unit cost of electricity and heat products was calculated. In addition, the previous thermoeconomic methods were applied and calculated to equal system. As a result of comparing various methods, the unit costs by OECOPC method were calculated in the middle value of those. This result tells that OECOPC methods are most moderate. The suggested OECOPC method can apply any energy system. Hence this method is expected to make contribution to cost accounting on energy System.