• 제목/요약/키워드: Evaluation Reporting

검색결과 277건 처리시간 0.023초

CARE 지침에 따른 대한한방소아과학회지의 증례보고에 대한 질평가 (Evaluation of the Quality of the Case Reports from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine Based on the CARE Guidelines)

  • 이혜림;김지환;이명수;이주아
    • 대한한방소아과학회지
    • /
    • 제32권3호
    • /
    • pp.131-140
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objectives The purpose of this study is to assess the quality of case reports from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine. Methods Case reports were selected from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine from January 2015 to April 2018, by utilizing Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS). The quality of the reports were reviewed based on the Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (CARE) guideline. Results Total of 13 case reports were finally selected for the assessment. 73.08% of the case reports included necessary information based on the CARE guideline but the rest of the reports did not. More than 50% of the reports were missing data regarding 'Timeline', 'Diagnostic challenges', 'Intervention adherence and tolerability', 'Adverse and unanticipated events', or 'Patient perspective or experience'. Also, the reports did not include 'Key word', 'Introduction in abstract', 'Case presentation in abstract', or 'The rationale for conclusions' information. Conclusions Case reports from the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine have important role in pediatrics. Efforts are needed to improve the quality of the case reports as well as to develop reporting guidelines for the Journal of Pediatrics of Korean Medicine.

CONSORT statement를 기반으로 한 국내 Science Citation Index 저널과 NEJM의 Randomized Controlled Trial의 abstracts 질적 비교 평가 연구 (The quality of Reports on Randomized Controlled Trials abstracts from Korean Science Citation Index journal and NEJM; Evaluation and Comparison of adherence to the CONSORT Statement)

  • 경은정;김효선;김은영
    • 한국임상약학회지
    • /
    • 제22권2호
    • /
    • pp.131-136
    • /
    • 2012
  • Objective: This study evaluated and compared the adherence to the CONSORT for quality of reports on the randomized controlled trials (RCT) abstracts by four major Korean Science Citation Index (SCI) journals and The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). Methods: A descriptive analysis of published RCT abstracts in Korean SCI journals and NEJM from 2007/01 to 2011/06 was conducted by two reviewers, independently extracting data from a PubMed search. A modification of CONSORT for abstract was used including 16 checklist items. Reporting of checklist items for individual group was conducted to compare adherence patterns between two groups. Results: We identified the potential 57 RCT abstracts from Korean SCI and 50 from NEJM meeting our inclusion criteria; among them, three abstracts from Korean SCI and one from NEJM were excluded. Among total 16 checklist items based on CONSORT statement, Korean SCI journals and NEJM were statistically equivalent in 4 items; Korean journals were better in three items and NEJM were in nine. The methodological quality domains were inadequately reported in both journals: allocation concealment about 1.9% and 4.0%, and blinding 44.4% and 40.8%. In general, The CONSORT adherence of NEJM was better than that of Korean SCI in the method and result domain (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The quality of NEJM reporting of RCT abstracts was better than that of Korean SCI, in general. This study on adherence of RCT reports from Korean SCI journals and NEJM abstracts to the CONSORT statement reveals that there is a need for improvement, especially Korean SCI. Further investigation on the quality of RCT reports and ways to improve reporting quality is required.

CARE 지침에 따른 대한한의학회지의 증례 보고에 대한 질 평가 연구: 2015년~2020년 증례 보고를 중심으로 (Evaluation of the Quality of the Case Reports in Journal of Korean Medicine from Year 2015 to 2020 : Using CARE Guidelines)

  • 황지혜;구자승;남은영
    • 대한한의학회지
    • /
    • 제41권2호
    • /
    • pp.80-95
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to assess the quality of the Journal of Korean medicine case reports. Methods: Case reports published in the Journal of Korean Medicine from January 2015 to March 2020 were selected by using Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) and the journal search system of the Korean Medical Association (https://www.jkom.org). The quality of the case reports was assessed using the Consensus-based Clinical Case Reporting Guideline Development (CARE) guidelines. Results: 33 case reports were selected for the assessment. Based on the CARE guidelines, 61.54% of the case reports included necessary information, but the quality level was uneven. More than 60% of the reports were missing data regarding 'Discussion of the strengths and limitations in your approach to this case', 'Intervention adherence and tolerability', 'Timeline', 'Medical, family, and psychosocial history including relevant genetic information', 'Patient perspective or experience', 'Adverse and unanticipated events', 'Administration of intervention', and 'De-identified demographic information and other patient specific information'. In most reports of over 90%, data regarding 'Diagnostic challenges', 'Intervention adherence and tolerability', and 'Key word' were not included. Conclusions: Efforts are needed to improve the quality of case reports in the Journal of Korean Medicine, and it is necessary to develop appropriate guidelines for case reporting for the Journal of Korean Medicine. In addition, all articles submitted to the Journal of Korean Medicine are to be complied with submission instructions and CARE guidelines.

CARE (CAse REport) 지침에 의한 한방비만학회지 증례 논문에 대한 보고의 질 평가: 2013년~2018년 증례보고를 중심으로 (Evaluation of the Quality of Case Reports of the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research from 2013 to 2018 According to the CARE (CAse REport) Guidelines)

  • 박경무;최성열;이주아;송윤경
    • 한방비만학회지
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.144-151
    • /
    • 2018
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of case reports of the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research by the Case Report (CARE) guidelines. Methods: Case reports published in the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research from January 2013 to July 2018 were searched from Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS). We assessed the quality of reporting based on CARE guidelines. Results: A total of 8 case reports were finally included for the assessment. There was a deviation in the sub-item reporting rate by a maximum 75% and a minimum 57.14% in case reports. The 10 sub-items mentioned below, such as 'Timeline', 'Diagnostic challenges', 'Diagnostic reasoning including other diagnoses considered', 'Prognostic characteristics', 'Changes in intervention', 'Important follow-up diagnostic evaluations and other test results', 'Intervention adherence and tolerability', 'Adverse and unanticipated events', 'Patient perspective' and 'Informed consent' were reported below 30%. Conclusions: Efforts to diversify the subject of the case study and to apply appropriate reporting guidelines are needed to improve the quality of the case report contributed to the Journal of Korean Medicine for Obesity Research.

이동통신에서 리포팅 셀 계획을 위한 타부서치 기반 최적화 알고리즘 (Tabu Search based Optimization Algorithm for Reporting Cell Planning in Mobile Communication)

  • 장길웅
    • 한국정보통신학회논문지
    • /
    • 제24권9호
    • /
    • pp.1193-1201
    • /
    • 2020
  • 이동통신에서 이동단말의 위치관리를 위해 셀 구조를 결정하는 셀 계획은 네트워크 성능을 결정하는 중요한 연구과제로 다루어지고 있다. 이동통신에서 셀 구조를 계획하는데 영향을 주는 요소 중 위치관리를 위한 신호비용이 가장 중요한 역할을 하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 이동통신에서 리포팅 셀 구조를 가진 네트워크에서 셀 구조를 계획하기 위해 사용되는 모든 셀의 위치관리비용을 최소화 하는 최적화 알고리즘을 제안한다. 제안된 알고리즘은 메타휴리스틱 알고리즘인 타부서치 알고리즘을 사용하며, 제안된 알고리즘은 새로운 이웃해 생성방식을 제안하여 최적해에 가까운 결과를 도출한다. 제안된 알고리즘의 성능을 평가하기 위해 위치관리비용과 알고리즘 수행시간 관점에서 시뮬레이션을 수행하였다. 평가 결과에서 기존의 유전 알고리즘 및 모의 담금질 기법과 비교 평가하여 제안된 알고리즘의 성능이 우수함을 볼 수 있었다.

CARE(CAse REport) 지침에 따른 2019-2024년 대한한방부인과학회지 증례보고의 질 평가 (Evaluation of the Quality of the Case Reports in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology from April 2019 to February 2024 Based on the CARE Guidelines)

  • 권한슬;윤예진;김형준
    • 대한한방부인과학회지
    • /
    • 제37권2호
    • /
    • pp.17-34
    • /
    • 2024
  • Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of case reports published in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology from April 2019 to February 2024, compared with January 2015 to March 2019. Methods: Case reports were selected by searching from archive on the website of society of the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology. The quality of the case reports were assessed based on CAse REport (CARE) guideline. Results: A total of 30 case reports was finally included for the assessment. Overall quality of reporting for case reports published from April 2019 to February 2024 was improved compared to one of previous study. However, the 4 items of CARE guidelines with an unreported rate of 50% or more - patient's perspective on interventions (96.67%), diagnostic challenges (93.33%), intervention adherence and tolerability (93.33%), adverse events (56.67%) - are items that require active description in future case reports. In addition, Keyword and timeline have more than 50% reported to be 'Not-sufficient' in both previous and present studies. So active efforts by researchers are needed to include 'Case report (or Case study)' in keywords, and to include intervention by period, symptom changes in a timeline. Conclusions: Despite the overall improvement in the quality of reporting in the Journal of Korean Obstetrics and Gynecology, efforts to improve the quality of case reports should be continued.

기본간호학회지에 게재된 질적 연구의 분석 (Analysis of Qualitative Research Published by Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing)

  • 박형숙;김영미
    • 기본간호학회지
    • /
    • 제22권4호
    • /
    • pp.442-451
    • /
    • 2015
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze reports of qualitative research published in Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing (JKAFN). Methods: Twenty four qualitative research studies using in-depth interviews and focus group interviews published in JKAFN from 1994 to 2014 were selected for analysis. Chosen reports were analyzed by consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ), which is a reporting guideline for qualitative research. COREQ consists of 32 items and 3 domains. Results: In the 1st domain, the relationship of researchers and research participants, bias and understanding of the researchers on the study phenomenon were analyzed less than other items. In the 2nd domain, methodological research was carried out across various qualitative studies, but the description of the research environment and research questions for the interview guidelines was insufficient. In the 3rd domain, research results and data were consistent, but data showing opposing content and explanations of negative practices were not done at all. Conclusion: These results indicate a need for the development of evaluation tools for qualitative research and items should be added to improve the reliability and validity, research should be related to the ethics in the framework of the COREQ.

봄꽃의 개화가 대학생들에게 미치는 시각·심리적 영향 (Visio-psychological Effect of Spring Flowers Blossoms on University Students)

  • 조현주;홍계숙
    • 한국환경과학회지
    • /
    • 제25권8호
    • /
    • pp.1097-1105
    • /
    • 2016
  • The present study was performed to investigate the psychological effects of spring flowers blossoms, which is one of the elements influencing to human psychology, in order to provide scientific evidence on the psychological benefits of green plants. A self-reporting survey was conducted by using self reporting questionnaires on the impression (semantic differential method: SD method) and mood states (profile of mood states: POMS) of eighty university students in their twenties. Korean forsythia, Korean rosebay, Japanese apricot, Cherry blossom, and Magnolia were chosen as spring flowers. The results of impression evaluation and mood states changes showed that spring flower blossom had beautiful, soft, warm, moist, familiar and full impressions, and changed our mood positively by reducing depression and anger, or by increasing vigor. In addition, different psychological effects can be differently observed depending on the species; for example, Cherry blossom had a greater effect in changing the impression and feeling than others. The findings would provide support toward the active usage in green space as well as its design maximizing the psychological effects of nature.

우리나라 약물유해반응 감시체계 (Adverse Drug Reaction Surveillance System in Korea)

  • 최남경;박병주
    • Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
    • /
    • 제40권4호
    • /
    • pp.278-284
    • /
    • 2007
  • Despite extensive researches and pre-market clinical trials, only limited information on the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of a drug can be collected at the time of market approval from regulatory agency. ADRs constitute a major public health problem. Post-marketing surveillance of drugs is important to detect signals for ADR. In Korea, one of the main methods for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs is spontaneous reporting system of suspected ADRs. Re-examination and re-evaluation system are in force for monitoring safety of new market approval drugs and currently under marketing drugs, respectively. Recently, regional pharmacovigilance centers were designated from Korean Food and Drug Administration for facilitating ADR surveillance. Over recent years, with the development of information technology, there has been an increased interest in establishing data mining system for detecting signals from Health Insurance Review Agency database. The purpose of this paper is to review the current status of Korean ADR surveillance system and suggest the possible solutions for developing active pharmacovigilance system in Korea.

Multidetector computed tomography in preoperative planning for temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A pictorial review and proposed structured reporting format

  • Singh, Rashmi;Bhalla, Ashu Seith;Manchanda, Smita;Roychoudhury, Ajoy
    • Imaging Science in Dentistry
    • /
    • 제51권3호
    • /
    • pp.313-321
    • /
    • 2021
  • Ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a disabling disease resulting from fibrous or bony fusion of the mandibular condyle and the glenoid fossa. Early diagnosis and surgical treatment are essential to prevent facial deformity and other complications. Conventional radiography has limitations in demonstrating the true extent of ankylosis. It is important for surgeons to be aware of the size and degree of bony ankylosis in order to perform complete resection of the ankylotic mass. In addition, a detailed evaluation of the relationship with adjacent vital structures such as the internal maxillary artery, inferior alveolar nerve canal, external auditory canal, and skull base are crucial to avoid iatrogenic injury. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the current imaging modality of choice for preoperative assessments. Herein, the authors propose a structured CT reporting template for TMJ ankylosis to strengthen the value of the preoperative imaging report and to reduce the rates of intraoperative complications and recurrence.