• 제목/요약/키워드: Environmentally adjusted cost-benefit analysis(EACBA)

검색결과 2건 처리시간 0.013초

환경영향평가와 비용편익분석 연계의 유용성- 하천관리사업 및 습지간척사업을 사례로 - (A Study on Linking BCA into the EIA System Based on Two Cases)

  • 최미희
    • 환경영향평가
    • /
    • 제13권3호
    • /
    • pp.103-114
    • /
    • 2004
  • As most of environmental impacts caused by development projects are irrevocable, a thorough review is utmost necessary. Ecological-economic integrated approach inspired by Norgaard's co-evolution theory should be applied to the environmentally adjusted CBA, which plays a decisive role in the feasibility analysis. Based on case studies of NamHan River Management Project and Yeongsangang Wetland Reclamation Project, this paper attempts to show the usefulness of linking basic plan and implimentation design to EIA and suggests to integrate EACBA into the current EIA system institutionally as a more effective policy tool for realizing sustainable development in Korea.

대규모 공공투자사업의 경제적 타당성 평가와 환경영향평가 통압 방안 - 새만금 간척사업을 사례로 - (Integration of the Feasibility Assessment Procedure and EIA of the Big Public Investment Project : In the Case of the Saemangeum Reclamation Project)

  • 최미희
    • 환경영향평가
    • /
    • 제11권2호
    • /
    • pp.93-107
    • /
    • 2002
  • The choice of big public investment project needs an appropriate feasibility analysis before it is implemented, bemuse a rot wisely chosen one would bring about big and longrun societal costs. But the feasibility analysis for the big public investment project in Korea has been done without linking the economic benefits and environmental damages. Consequently social conflicts arose frequently during and after project implementation, owing to such concerns asincreasing costs and serious ecological damages. The recent social conflict over the Saemangeum Project is a typical case. This reclamation project began in 1991 and finished 60% of the whole process in 1999, when its feasibility was again assessed under the public pressure by the joint assessment team consisting of both citizen's and government's professionals. Even the assessment report by this joint team could not show the convincing results owing to the improper assessment procedure and failure to set proper feasibility criteria. This paper pointed out the limitations of our current procedure of feasibility assessment and identified the concrete problems that atosee during the recent reassessment process of the Saemangeum reclamation project by the joint team. In order to improve the current problem-ridden practices, it is concluded by the policy recommendation for establishing a right feasibility assessment procedure for the public investment projects.