• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.189-199
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 "디지털 환경권"이라는 새로운 권리 개념 정립을 통해 정보교과 강화의 필요성을 역설하고 정보교과 내 정보문화소양의 교육구성 모델 개선 제안을 목적으로 한다. 디지털 환경권 개념 도입을 통하여 정보교과를 필수교과목화 하기 위한 논리적 근거를 제공하고 정보 교과 내 정보문화소양의 구성을 재체계화함으로써 디지털 시민으로서 학생이 디지털 환경을 살아가는데 필요한 역량 제고에 기여하고자 한다. 이에 대한 연구로 디지털 환경에서 요구되는 권리 개념의 논리를 분석하고 디지털 환경권 개념을 정립한다. 그리고 디지털 환경 전환과 관련하여 미국, 호주, 일본 등의 주요국에서 실행하고 있는 관련 교육과정을 분석함으로써 정보교과의 교육구성 개선안을 도출한다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다.: 첫째, 디지털 환경권은 '쾌적하고 안전한 디지털 환경을 누릴 권리' 이다. 둘째, 디지털 환경권의 세분화된 구성요소로는 디지털 환경을 위한 권리(사이버윤리), 디지털 환경의 권리(사이버안전), 디지털 환경에 대한 권리(사이버보안)가 있다. 셋째, 주요국에서는 정보 관련 교육 내용으로 디지털시민성, 코드 윤리, 그리고 신기술 보안에 대해 다양한 교육구성이 이루어지고 있다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.134-142
• /
• 2021

Background: From 2018 to 2020, the Expert Study on Public Understanding after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident (the Expert Study Group) identified and analyzed activities designed to promote public understanding of science and radiation since the Fukushima accident, and held discussions on how to achieve public understanding in the situation where public confidence has been lost, and how experts should prepare for dealing with the public. This panel session was held at the 53^rd meeting of the Japan Health Physics Society on June 30, 2020. Materials and Methods: First, three subgroup (SG) leaders reported their research methods and results. Then, two designated speakers, who participated as observers of the Expert Study Group, commented on the activities. Next, the five speakers held a panel discussion. Finally, the rapporteur summarized. Results and Discussion: SG leaders presented reports from researchers and practitioners in health physics and environmental risks who provided information after the Fukushima accident. During the discussion, experts in sociology and ethics discussed the issues, focusing on the overall goals of the three groups, local (personal) and mass communication, and ethical values. Many of the activities instituted by the experts after the accident were aimed at public understanding of science (that is, to provide knowledge to residents), but by taking into account interactions with residents and their ethical norms, the experts shifted to supporting the residents' decision-making through public engagement. The need to consider both content and channels is well known in the field of health communication, and overlaps with the above discussion. Conclusion: How to implement and promote the public engagement in society was discussed in both the floor and designated discussions. Cooperation between local communities and organizations that have already gained trust is also necessary in order to develop relationships with local residents in normal times, to establish an information transmission system, and to make it work effectively.

• 대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학
• /
• 제44권5호
• /
• pp.503-512
• /
• 2021

The purpose of this study is to check the extent to which "instruction of physician or dentist" defined in the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act is applied in relation to radiography examination procedures for radiological technologists. In addition, it is intended to present basic data on the requirement to revise the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act in the radiological technologist's duty area and scope of work, The subjects of this study were radiological technologists with license, and the response data were collected after sending the questionnaire link written on the online questionnaire form. The final number of respondents were 1,018, and the response rate was 6.8%. Most of the negative responses were "I have never received 'instruction' for radiologic examination by a physician or dentist, including a radiologist in a medical environment." There were a high perception that "the professionalism in radiation examination on radiological technologists are higher than that of a physician or dentist." They answered that the current continuing education has a great impact on maintaining and continuing professionalism and learning new knowledge in the radiology field. In addition, the radiological technologists provide a very high level of education in areas related to radiography procedure ethics such as patient care, patient safety, and patient privacy protection, as well as specialized fields such as radiation-related examination methods, radiography examination dose, and patient exposure dose. Radiological technologists replied that they were receiving it consistently. In conclusion, in the current medical environment, the 'instruction' of a physician or dentist cannot be seen as being realistically performed. The phrase 'instruction' of a physician or dentist as defined in the Medical Service Technologists, etc. Act is considered inappropriate in respect of the fact that the state recognizes the qualifications of the medical service technologist through a license. It is thought that revision to a new term suitable for the current medical environment is necessary.