• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.381-388
• /
• 2008

Various techniques and diversely designed implants have been developed to overcome anatomic limitations of the maxillary posterior alveolar bone. The OSFE (osteotome sinus floor elevation) technique has been used for maxillary sinus augmentation. Also, $Endopore^{(R)}$ implant was designed to increase the surface area by its sintered porous surface. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival rate of $Endopore^{(R)}$ implants placed in the posterior maxilla in association with the elevation of the sinus membrane using OSFE technique, and examine the new bone formation in the sinus. One hundred fifteen $Endopore^{(R)}$ implants in 66 patients were placed in the posterior maxilla by OSFE technique. The implants were clinically and radiographically followed up for an average of 26.3 months. Most implants were stable and radiographs showed that the bone regenerated in contact with the implants. But, 5 implants in 4 patients were removed after the prosthetic restoration and the survival rate was 95.6% during the follow-up period. The height of new bone formed in the sinus was $3.26{\pm}1.04mm$.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• v.35 no.5
• /
• pp.361-366
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective report was to analyze long-term survival rate of sintered porous-surfaced dental implant ($Endopore^{(R)}$ Dental Implant system, Innova Corporation, Toronto, ON, Canada). Methods: 61 partially edentulous patients were received a total of 127 Endopore dental implants in the maxilla. Of the 127 implants, 24 implants were restored with individual (ie, non-splinted) crowns, while 103 implants were splinted to other implants. Medical records and radiographs were evaluated and analyzed by the cumulative survival rate, location of implants, implants length and diameter, crown/implant ratio and whether the implant was splinted. Chi squire test was used statistically. Result: Of the 127 implants, 8 implants (6.3%) were removed and and cumulative survival rate was 93.7%. Conclusion: Endopore implants showed satisfactory results after up to 8 years function periods in the edentulous posterior maxilla.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.42 no.4
• /
• pp.425-442
• /
• 2004

Statement of problem: A difficulty in achieving a passive-fitting prosthesis can be overcome by individual crown restoation of multiple implants. But individualized crown has another difficulty in control of contact tightness and stress distribution. Purpose: This in vitro study is to evaluate the stress distribution and the magnitude in the supporting tissues around Endopore implants with different crown lengths, interproximal contact tightness, and the splinting effects. Material & methods: Three Endopore implants($4.1{\times}9mm$) were placed in the mandibular posterior edentulous area distal to the canine and photoelastic model was made with PL-2 resin(Measurements Group, Raleigh, USA). Restorations were fabricated in two crown lengths: 9, 13 mm. For non-splinted restorations, individual crowns were fabricated on three custom-milled titanium abutments. After the units were cemented, 4 levels of interproximal contact tightness were evaluated: open, ideal($8{\mu}m$ shim stock drags without tearing), medium($40{\mu}m$), and heavy($80{\mu}m$). For splinted restorations, 3-unit fixed partial dentures were fabricated. This study was examined under simulated non-loaded and loaded conditions(6.8 kg). Photoelastic stress analysis was carried out to measure the fringe order around the implant supporting structure. Results: 1. When restorations were not splinted, the more interproximal contact tightness was increased among the three implants, the more stress was shown in the cervical region of each implant. When crown length was increased, stresses tended to increase in the apex of implants but there were little differences in stress fringes. 2. When nonsplinted restorations were loaded on the first or third implant, stresses were increased in the apex and cervical region of loaded implant. Regardless of interproximal contact tightness level, stresses were not distributed among the three implants. But with tighter interproximal contact, stresses were increased in the cervical region of loaded first or third implant. 3. When the nonsplinted restorations were not loaded, there were little stresses on the supporting structure of implants, but low level stresses were shown in the splinted restorations even after sectioning and soldering. 4. With splinted restorations, there were little differences in stresses between different crown lengths. When splinted restorations were loaded, stresses were increased slightly on the loaded implant, but relatively even stress distribution occurred among the three implants. Conclusions: Splinting the crowns of adjacent implants is recommended for Endopore implants under the overloading situation.