• 한국생물공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국생물공학회 2003년도 생물공학의 동향(XIII)
• /
• pp.800-800
• /
• 2003

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.377-383
• /
• 1995

목적 : 자궁내막암 1, 2기 환자에서 수술전 방사선 치료와 수술후 방사선 치료의 성적을 후향적으로 비교 분석하여 적합한 치료 방법을 얻고자 본 연구를 시행하였다. 방법 : 1985. 1월부터 1991 12월까지 연세대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학과에 내원하여 방사선 치료를 받은 자궁내막암 환자 62명을 대상으로 하였으며,이중 19명(1기 12명, 2기 7명)은 수술전4-6주전에 방사선 치료를 받았으며(1군), 43명(1기 32명, 2기 11명)은 수술후 4-5주후에 방사선 치료를 받았다(2군). 2군중에 질내조사만 시행된 1명의 환자를 제외한 61명의 환자에서 모두 외부방사선 치료가 시행되었으며, 1관의 $70{\%}$(13/19)와 2군의 $44{\%}$(23/42)의 환자에서는 외부방사선 치료와 강내조사가 시행되었다. 외부방사선 조사는 180 cGy를 하루에 한 번씩 주 5회 시행하였으며, 총 방사선 조사선량은 39.6-55 Gy(중앙값 : 45 Gy)였다. 강내조사는 1군에서는 Point A에 20-39.6 Gy(중앙값 ; 39 Gy)가 조사되었고, 2군에서는 질 표면에서 0.5cm 깊이에 18-30 Gy(중앙값 ; 21 Gy)가 조사되었다. 결과 : 수술전 방사선 치료군과 수술후 방사선 치료군의 5년 생존율은 각각 $89{\%},\;98{\%}$로 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 없었다(p>0.1). 또한 병기.분화도,조직학적 형태에 따른 양 군간의 5년 생존율도 차이가 없었다 1군에서 수술전 방사선 치료후에 잔재암의 존재 여부에 따라서는 5년 생존율의 차이가 없었으며(p>0.1), 2군에서 림프절의 전이 여부에 따라 5년 생존율이 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<0.5). 치료에 따른 부작용은 1군이 더 많았다($16{\%}$ vs $5{\%}$). 결론 : 수술후 방사선 치료 방법은 수술전 방사선 치료 방법에 비하여 정확한 병의 진행 정도를 알 수 있으며, 부작용이 적음으로 자궁내막암의 치료에 좀더 적합한 치료 방법이라고 하겠다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권6호
• /
• pp.2905-2909
• /
• 2014

Background: To study the incidence of non-endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium and compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes with endometrioid carcinoma patients. Materials and Methods: This study included 236 patients with endometrial carcinoma at Siriraj Hospital whom were diagnosed and treated from 2003 through 2006. The clinical characteristics, pathological features, treatment and clinical outcomes were collected from the medical records. The 5-year survival was calculated according to 2009 FIGO staging. Results: Non-endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium accounted for 10.2% of all endometrial carcinomas (24/236 patients). The 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in the non-endometrioid group compared to the endometrioid group (77.3% vs 96%, p<0.001) and clinical data pointed to greater malignancy. Conclusions: Non-endometrioid carcinoma of endometrium is relative rare but is more aggressive, has more distant metastasis at diagnosis with a worse survival rate than endometrioid carcinoma. Only patients in stage IA with no residual disease on a hysterectomy specimen may not need adjuvant treatment.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.881-887
• /
• 2015

Purpose: To analyze treatment modalities and prognostic factors in patients with Stage I-II endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS). Materials and Methods: Twenty four patients (nineteen with low-grade ESS [LGESS] and five with high-grade ESS [HGESS]) were assessed retrospectively in terms of general characteristics, prognostic factors, treatment methods and survival. Results: Twenty patients were at Stage I and three were at Stage II. The stage of one patient could not be determined. With respect to age and comorbidity, no statistically significant difference was found among disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.990; p=0.995). However, DFS was significantly shorter in Stage II than Stage I patients (p=0.002). It was also significantly shorter in HGESS patients than in LGESS patients (p=0.000). There was no statistically significant differences among the overall survival (OVS) times of patients with respect to age at diagnosis and comorbid disease (p=0.905; p=0.979) but OVS was significantly shorter in patients with HGESS (p=0.00) and Stage II disease (p=0.001). No statistically significant difference was found with respect to OVS between patients who received radiotherapy (RT) and those who did not receive RT (p=0.055). It was not statistically possible to include other treatment modalities in the analysis because of the small sample size. Conclusions: Grade and stage of a tumour were found to be the most important prognostic factors. It was not possible to determine the optimal surgical method and the effect of adjuvant treatment since the number of cases was insufficient.

• Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
• /
• 제47권4호
• /
• pp.237-244
• /
• 2020

Endometrial cancer (EC) in young women tends to be early-stage and low-grade; therefore, such cases have good prognoses. Fertility-sparing treatment with progestin is a potential alternative to definitive treatment (i.e., total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic washing, and/or lymphadenectomy) for selected patients. However, no evidence-based consensus or guidelines yet exist, and this topic is subject to much debate. Generally, the ideal candidates for fertility-sparing treatment have been suggested to be young women with grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma confined to the endometrium. Magnetic resonance imaging should be performed to rule out myometrial invasion and extrauterine disease before initiating fertility-sparing treatment. Although various fertility-sparing treatment methods exist, including the levonorgestrel-intrauterine system, metformin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, photodynamic therapy, and hysteroscopic resection, the most common method is high-dose oral progestin (medroxyprogesterone acetate at 500-600 mg daily or megestrol acetate at 160 mg daily). During treatment, re-evaluation of the endometrium with dilation and curettage at 3 months is recommended. Although no consensus exists regarding the ideal duration of maintenance treatment after achieving regression, it is reasonable to consider maintaining the progestin therapy until pregnancy with individualization. According to the literature, the ovarian stimulation drugs used for fertility treatments appear safe. Hysterectomy should be performed after childbearing, and hysterectomy without oophorectomy can also be considered for young women. The available evidence suggests that fertility-sparing treatment is effective and does not appear to worsen the prognosis. If an eligible patient strongly desires fertility despite the risk of recurrence, the clinician should consider fertility-sparing treatment with close follow-up.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권22호
• /
• pp.9599-9602
• /
• 2014

Background: Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in the management of early stage endometrial cancer (EC) is still controversial. Here we report our institutional experience with patients who received postoperative RT for stage I-II EC over a period of 35 years and assess potential predictors of local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS). Materials and Methods: A total of 188 patients undergoing postoperative RT for stage IA-II EC between 1977 and 2012 were evaluated. Some 96 received median 46 Gy whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) (range: 40-60 Gy), 37 were given WPRT with vaginal cuff therapy (VCT), and 55 received only VCT either with brachytherapy (BT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Chemotherapy was given to 5 patients with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of clinicopathological factors on LR, DM, and OS. Results: Median follow-up time was 11 years (range: 1-35 years). At the time of analysis, 34 patients were not alive. Of the 15 patients with LR, 7 (46.7%) recurred in the vaginal stump, 5 (33.3%) in the pelvic region, and 3 (20%) in the paraaortic nodal region, while 12 had distant metastasis. UPSC histology (p=0.027), sole VCT (p=0.041), high histologic grade (p=0.034), and age ${\geq}71$ (p=0.04) were poor prognostic factors on univariate analysis. Conclusions: In our patients receiving radiotherapy for early-stage EC, grade III disease and age ${\geq}71$ were associated with shorter OS whereas UPSC histology was an independent predictor for both LR and DM.

• 수면정신생리
• /
• 제20권1호
• /
• pp.10-14
• /
• 2013

Sleep disturbances are commonly encountered problems in cancer patients. Sleep has a role in maintenance of immunity, metabolism, and quality of life but little has been known about the prevalence, risk factors, and effects on prognosis of sleep disturbances in patients with cancer. Also little attention has been made on proper assessment and management of sleep disorders in these patients. Recently, there have been some reports that sleep disorders are related with development of many cancers such as breast, colorectal, prostate, and endometrial cancers. An intermittent hypoxia and a disruption of circadian rhythm are considered as one of the possible mechanisms of cancer developments. More aggressive evaluation and meticulous management of sleep disturbances in cancer patients are essential to improve quality of life as well as prognosis.

• 대한세포병리학회지
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.147-153
• /
• 1998

We have investigated the cervicovaginal smears in order to define the cytologic features of uterine adenocarcinomas. Total 22 cases were reviewed(12 cases from the Sanggye Paik hospital, Inje university and 10 cases from the Korea Cancer Center Hospital) from January 1992 to December 1997. Five cases were endometrial adenocarcinomas and the remaining 17 cases were cervical adenocarcinomas. Seventeen cases of cervical adenocarcinomas were divided into endometrioid(6 cases), endocervical(7 cases), mixed endometrioid and endocervical(1 case), papillary (2 cases), and adenosquamous(1 case) carcinomas. The background of endocervical adenocarcinoma was hemorrhagic or inflammatory. The tumor diathesis was less prominent than that of the squamous cell carcinoma. The prominent features of the endocervical type adenocarcinomas were large and loose clusters, large intracytoplasmic vacuoles, and prominent overlapping and peripheral palisading of nuclei. In contrast, the endometrioid adenocarcinomas showed small and compact clusters, and small intracytoplasmic vacuoles. The detection rate of endometrial adenocarcinoma was lower than that of the endocervical adenocarcinoma.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제17권9호
• /
• pp.4401-4404
• /
• 2016

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of malnutrition in gynecologic cancer patients using the Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) questionnaire. Materials and Methods: A total of 97 gynecologic cancer patients who never had any treatment but were planned for surgery were enrolled. The patients were asked to complete the scored PG-SGA form before the treatment was started. Attending physicians were also asked to complete other information in the PG-SGA form. Total scores were calculated and the patients were classified into 3 nutritional status levels. Results: Mean age was 54 years. Postoperative diagnoses were endometrial cancer in 42 cases (43.2%), ovarian cancer in 29 cases (29.9%), and cervical cancer in 26 cases (26.8%). Mean PG-SGA score was 5.2+4.7. Malnutrition (PG-SGA B and C) was found in 52 patients (53.6%, 95% CI 43.7% - 63.2%). Preoperative BMI, hemoglobin, serum albumin, and cancer stage were not significantly associated with nutritional status. Malnutrition was significantly more common among patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer, compared to other types of cancer (79.3% vs. 42.6%, p 0.004). Conclusions: Prevalence of malnutrition among gynecologic cancer patients was 53.5%, according to the scored PG-SGA. Malnutrition was significantly more common among patients with ovarian cancer.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.149-159
• /
• 2008

목 적: 본 연구는 자궁내막암 병기 $1{\sim}2$ 환자에 수술 후 방사선치료의 결과와 예후인자를 분석하여 향후 치료원칙을 결정하는 데 도움을 얻고자 시행하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1991년 1월부터 2005년 12월까지 이화여자대학교 의과대학부속병원에서 자궁내막암으로 진단받고 수술 후 방사선치료를 받은 병기 $1{\sim}2$환자를 대상으로 후향적 분석을 하였다. 전체 환자는 35명이었으며 17명은 자궁절제술과 양측 난소제거술을 시행하였고 18명은 완전한 수술적 병기의 수술을 시행하였다. 골반강 방사선치료를 받은 환자는 17명, 질강내근접치료를 받은 환자는 12명, 골반강 방사선치료와 질강내근접치료를 받은 환자는 6명이었다. 결 과: 추적기간의 중앙값은 54개월이었다. 전체 환자의 5년 생존율은 91.4%, 무병생존율은 81.7%이었다. 저위험군, 중간위험군, 고위험군의 위험군에 따른 5년 생존율은 각각 100%, 100%, 55.6%이었으며 무병생존율은 각각 100%, 70.0%, 45.7%이었다. 국소재발된 환자는 없었으며 5명(14%)에서 원격전이가 발생하였으며 호발부위는 폐, 뼈, 간, 부신, 전복강의 순이었다. 원격전이에 대한 단변량 통계분석에 따르면 위험군, 조직학적 세포형태와 조직학적 등급이 유의성이 있었으며, 다변량 통계분석에 따르면 조직학적 세포형태로서 유두형, 장액형, 그리고 투명세포암은 자궁내막양암과 샘암편평암에 비하여 원격전이율이 높고 생존율이 낮았다. 골반강 방사선치료에 의한 후유증은 장염이 30%에서 나타났으며 다음으로 직장염이었으나 대부분 등급 $1{\sim}2$로 등급 $3{\sim}4$의 후유증은 발생하지 않았다. 결 론: 수술 후 골반강 방사선치료 혹은 질강내근접치료를 시행한 자궁내막암 병기 $1{\sim}2$환자들의 경우 저위험군과 중간위험군은 국소제어율과 생존율이 높았으나, 고위험군은 골반강 방사선치료를 시행하여 국소제어율은 높으나 원격전이율이 높고 생존율이 낮았다. 따라서 고위험군은 방사선치료와 동시에 항암화학요법이 요구된다. 중간 위험군의 더 효율적인 치료를 위하여 많은 환자를 대상으로 골반강 방사선치료와 강내근접치료를 비교하는 전향적 무작위연구가 필요하다.