• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.210-214
• /
• 2014

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of different primary reasons for endodontic referrals and the clinical symptoms of the referred cases. Materials and Methods: Clinical data of total endodontic treatment cases (1,014 teeth) including endodontic referral cases (224 teeth) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012, at Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, were investigated retrospectively. The one major reason for referral, the clinical symptoms, and the resulting treatment procedures of referral cases were recorded. The percentages of clinical symptoms of the endodontic referral cases and the total endodontic treatment cases were compared by ${\chi}^2$ test for each symptom. Results: Persistent pain was the most frequent reason for endodontic referral (29.5%), followed by presence of gingival swelling and sinus tract (24.1%), and apical radiolucency (12.9%). Referrals in cases involving endodontic difficulties such as canal calcification, broken instruments, post, perforation, and resorption were less than 5.0%, respectively. The percentages of four major clinical symptoms of pain, apical radiolucency, previous endodontic treatment, and gingival swelling and sinus tract were significantly higher in the endodontic referral cases than those in the total endodontic cases (p = 0.001). Among the included referral cases, 72.8% were treated with nonsurgical endodontic treatment only. Teeth other than the referred teeth were diagnosed as the origin of the problem in 5.8% of the referrals. Conclusions: The high prevalence of pain, apical radiolucency, previous treatment, and gingival swelling and sinus tract in endodontic referral cases suggest that these symptoms may be what general practitioners consider to be difficult and refer to endodontists.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제35권3호
• /
• pp.143-152
• /
• 2019

목적: 이번 연구의 목적은 치과대학병원 보존과로 근관치료적으로 의뢰된 환자들과 치아들의 특성을 진료기록을 통해 살펴보고 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 2017년 1월부터 2018년 12월까지 한 치과대학병원 보존과에 내원한 환자들을 대상으로 환자의 진료기록을 통해 근관치료적으로 의뢰되었던 환자를 취합하였다. 총 1171명의 환자 기록을 분석하였다. 의뢰된 치아의 상태가 근관치료 전인지 근관치료 중인지 또는 근관 충전된 이후인지를 초진 당시의 방사선 사진과 진료기록 내용을 토대로 구분하여 3가지 군으로 정리해서 분석하였다. 결과: 의뢰된 치아들의 69.9%가 상, 하악 제1, 2대구치였다. 이전 기관에서 의뢰된 후 치과대학병원에 내원할 때까지 소요된 일수는 평균 9.03일이었고 의뢰서가 있는 경우가 65.6%였다. 주된 의뢰 이유로는 지속되는 임상 증상(통증, 종창, 누공)이 37.9%로 가장 많았으며 진단의 어려움 16.7%, 근관막힘 13.8%, 높은 해부학적 난이도 11.4% 순이었다. 세부적으로 근관치료 전에 의뢰된 경우에는 진단의 어려움이 많았고 근관치료 중에 의뢰된 경우에는 지속적인 임상 증상과 근관 막힘이 많았다. 근관 충전 후에 의뢰된 경우는 지속되는 임상 증상이 대부분이었다. 결론: 대구치인 경우 지속적인 임상 증상과 근관 막힘이 주된 이유인 비율이 높았고 전치의 경우 치근단 수술과 외상 치료의 비율이 높았다.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제57권8호
• /
• pp.428-436
• /
• 2019

In cases of a patient referral, the general dentist should communicate the patient's dental information as clearly as possible to the specialist to whom he/she is referring his/her patient. For this reason, it is necessary to write a referral letter in an accurate and complete manner. The purpose of this study is to analyze the referral letters of patients who are referred to the department of conservative dentistry in a dental university hospital. From January, 2017 to December, 2018, we gathered the information of the patients who were referred to the department of conservative dentistry in a dental university hospital with referral letter. We evaluated the fidelity of a total of 750 referral letters and recorded the information of the referral dentist and the dental clinic. The relationship between each item and fidelity was analyzed using SPSS 18.0 program. The analysis of the contents of the referral letters yielded the following results: The fidelity of the referral letter was higher when the patient was referred during the root canal treatment, or when there was a root canal filling or when there was pain during chewing. The fidelity of referral letter was low in cases where the referring clinic is close to and has cooperative relationship with dental university hospital. Among the factors affecting the fidelity, the year of graduation of the referral dentist was the most influential. This study confirmed the fact that the clinical practice of writing patient referral letters still leaves much to be desired. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to create more clear and standardized guidelines for writing referral letters.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.177-185
• /
• 2005

The purpose of the study was to investigate the influence of an endodontic infection on presence of furcation involvement in periodontally-involved mandibular molars. All first and second mandibualr molars in 45 patients were selected if at least one was root-filled or had a possible periapical radiolucency. The sample consisted of patients from a referral population at a periodotnal clinic which represented an adult population with a mean age of 47.5 years (range 31 to 63) For mandibular molars with periapical destruction at both roots, frequency of horizontal furcation depth ${\geqq}$ 3 mm was significantly more compared to teeth without periapical destruction. Mean periodontal probing depth was significantly greater at mandibular molars with periapical destruction. It is suggested that a root canal infection in periodontitis-involved molars may potentiate periodontitis progression by spreading of endodontic pathgens through patent accessory canals and dentinal tubules. In conclusion, an endodontic infection in mandibular molars was found to be associated with additional attachment loss in the furcation area, and may thus be considered to be one of several risk factors influencing the prognosis of molars in periodontitis-prone patients.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.455-460
• /
• 2007

치아의 통증을 호소하는 환자 중 임상검사 및 방사선학적 검사소견에서 특기할 병적 소견이 관찰되지 않는 경우 비치성 치통을 의심해보아야 하며, 근육질환, 상악동염, 신경병성 통증, 신경혈관 질환 등의 원인으로 치통이 유발될 수 있다. 이러한 비치성 치통의 경우 진성 치통과 구별하기 위하여 철저한 병력 조사 및 전반적인 임상검사가 시행되어야 하며, 진단용 국소마취를 통하여 보다 정확한 진단을 확립할 수 있다. 이러한 비치성 치통의 가장 흔한 원인 중의 하나인 근막동통은 근육조직을 촉진 시 단단한 띠가 만져지는 것이 특징적이며 이것이 발통점으로 작용하여 근육이 뻣뻣한 느낌과 피로감, 연관통, 치아에 전이되는 통증, 근긴장성 두통, 통각과민 등의 증상을 유발할 수 있으며, 특히 교근은 상악 구치부 및 하악 구치부의 통증을 유발한다. 본 증례는 우측 교근부의 근막동통에 기인한 하악 우측 구치부의 치통 양상을 운동요법, 물리치료, 약물치료 등의 통상적이고 가역적인 근육질환의 치료법을 통해 증상의 호전을 보인 증례이다. 비치성 치통은 정확하게 진단되지 않을 경우 근관치료, 치주치료, 발치 등의 불필요한 치과치료가 시행될 수 있으며, 이러한 치료를 통하여도 환자의 통증은 경감되지 않기 때문에 치과치료가 시행되기 전에 반드시 정확한 감별진단이 필요하리라 사료된다.

• Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.235-240
• /
• 2000

This study was carried out among 34 patients who visited Yonsei Dental Hospital from 1996. 1. to 1999. 5 for trigeminal neuralgia. By studying the patient's treatment prior to visiting our hospital, features of trigeminal neuralgia, treatment process of trigeminal neuralgia, prognosis of treatment, consultation with other professions and involvement of surgery, etc., the results are as follows: 1. 67.7% of onset age range from 40s to 60s, and average age is 50.2. 2. Ratio of right to left involvement is 1:2.1, male to female ratio is 1:1.9. 3. Occurrence rate of each branch is V3(44.1%), V2(11.8%), V1+V2+V3(11.8), V1+V2(8.8%). 4. Treatments prior to admission to our hospital are extraction(5.9%), endodontic treatment(5.9%), medication(11.8%), Oriental Medicine treatment(5.9%). 5. Routes of admittance to our hospital are by their preference(55.9%), local clinic referral(32.4%), E.N.T referral(5.9%), Neurology referral(5.9%). 6. 70.6% of patients treated at our hospital who were relieved of symptoms, were referred to Neurology(66.7%) and Pain Clinic(33.3%) for the reason of relapse, side effects of the drug itself, incomplete relief of pain. 7. 2 patients who were referred to medical part showed brain vessels contacting trigeminal nerve root on Brain MRangiography. But pain is being controlled by medication and no specific surgical procedure was carried out. The results show that 17.7% of patients admitted received inappropriate early treatment. In order to relieve tooth loss and patient's psychologic stress due to inappropriate treatment, precise differential diagnosis must be made among local teeth disease and idiopathic facial pain. Medication may show side effects of the drug itself, incomplete relief of pain or relapse of symptoms. Therefore, to treat trigeminal neuralgia appropriately by drug injection, surgery or radiation therapy, consultations among dentists, neurologists and anesthesiologists are required.