• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제82권2호
• /
• pp.447-454
• /
• 2021

저자들은 대퇴-대퇴동맥 우회 인조혈관 폐색 환자에서 AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy System (이하 AngioJet)과 색전보호기구를 이용하여 성공적으로 혈전제거술을 시행한 1예를 보고하고자 한다. 하지 혈관 전산화단층촬영에서 좌측에서 우측으로의 대퇴-대퇴 우회 인조혈관 폐색 소견을 보였다. AngioJet을 이용한 흐름 용해 혈전제거술과 풍선 혈관성형술을 시행하여 우측 하지 혈류를 재개통 시켰으며, 시술 중 우측 표재성 대퇴동맥에 색전보호기구를 거치시켜 효과적으로 원위부 색전을 예방할 수 있었다.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제58권4호
• /
• pp.316-320
• /
• 2015

Objective : The main concern during transfemoral carotid artery stenting (CAS) is preventing cerebral embolus dislodgement. We compared clinical outcomes and intraprocedural embolization rates of CAS using a distal filter protection device or proximal balloon occlusion device. Methods : From January 2011 to March 2015, a series of 58 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis ${\geq}70%$ were treated with CAS with embolic protection device in single center. All patients underwent post-CAS diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) to detect new ischemic lesions. We compared clinical outcomes and postprocedural embolization rates. Results : CAS was performed in all 61 patients. Distal filter protection success rate was 96.6% (28/29), whose mean age was 70.9 years, and mean stenosis was 81%. Their preprocedural infarction rate was 39% (11/28). Subsequent DW-MRI revealed 96 new ischemic lesions in 71% (20/28) patients. In contrast, the proximal balloon occlusion device success rate was 93.8% (30/32), whose mean age was 68.8 years and mean stenosis was 86%. Preprocedure infarction rate was 47% (14/30). DW-MRI revealed 45 new ischemic lesions in 57% (17/30) patients. Compared with distal filter protection device, proximal balloon occlusion device resulted in fewer ischemic lesions per patient (p=0.028). In each group, type of stent during CAS had no significant effect on number of periprocedural embolisms. Only 2 neurologic events occurred in the successfully treated patients (one from each group). Conclusion : Transfemoral CAS with proximal balloon occlusion device achieves good results. Compared with distal filter protection, proximal balloon occlusion might be more effective in reducing cerebral embolism during CAS.

• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제81권3호
• /
• pp.739-745
• /
• 2020

경동맥 혈관성형술 및 스텐트삽입술과 관련된 주요 합병증은 시술 도중 발생하는 원위부 뇌색전증으로 이를 방지하기 위해 색전예방장치가 개발되었다. 그러나 취약한 죽상경화반을 가진 환자의 경우 색전예방장치를 사용한 경동맥 혈관성형술 및 스텐트삽입술 후 뇌 색전증의 위험은 논란의 여지가 있으며, 색전예방장치의 사용에도 불구하고 무증상 또는 증상이 있는 뇌졸중이 발생한다. 저자들은 지방이 풍부한 괴사성 핵과 경화반 내 출혈이 있는 취약한 죽상경화반의 원위 필터형 색전예방장치를 이용한 내경동맥의 스텐트 시술 후 발생한 다량의 뇌 미세혈전의 증례를 보고하고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제53권3호
• /
• pp.155-160
• /
• 2013

Objective : The introduction and development of the embolic protecting device (EPD) has resulted in a decreased rate of stroke after carotid artery stenting (CAS). The authors performed a retrospective study to investigate the risk factors for developing large emboli after CAS which can lead to ischemic events. Methods : A total of 35 consecutive patients who underwent CAS between January 2009 and March 2012 were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups including those with small emboli (group A; grade 1, 2) and those with large emboli (group B; grade 3, 4). The size and number of emboli were assigned one of four grades (1=no clots, 2=1 or 2 small clots, 3=more than 3 small clots, 4=large clots) by microscopic observation of the EPD after CAS. We compared demographic characteristics, medical history, and angiographic findings of each group. Results : Thirty-five patients underwent CAS, and technical success was achieved in all cases. Twenty-three patients were included in group A and 12 patients in group B. Our results demonstrated that advanced age [odds ratio (OR) 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.52; p=0.044] and smoking (OR 42.06; CI 2.828-625.65, p=0.006) were independent risk factors for developing large emboli after CAS. Conclusion : In patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with CAS, advanced age and smoking increased the number and size of emboli. Although use of an EPD is controversial, it may be useful in CAS in patients with risk factors for large emboli in order to reduce the risk of ischemic events.