• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.267-273
• /
• 2009

Objectives : To compare the performance of three comorbidity measurements (Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser s comorbidity and comorbidity selection) with the effect of different comorbidity lookback periods when predicting in-hospital mortality for patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods : This was a retrospective study on patients aged 40 years and older who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. To distinguish comorbidity from complications, the records of diagnosis were drawn from the National Health Insurance Database excluding diagnosis that admitted to the hospital. C-statistic values were used as measures for in comparing the predictability of comorbidity measures with lookback period, and a bootstrapping procedure with 1,000 replications was done to determine approximate 95% confidence interval. Results : Of the 61,815 patients included in this study, the mean age was 63.3 years (standard deviation: ${\pm}$10.2) and 64.8% of the population was male. Among them, 1,598 2.6%) had died in hospital. While the predictive ability of the Elixhauser's comorbidity and comorbidity selection was better than that of the Charlson comorbidity index, there was no significant difference among the three comorbidity measurements. Although the prevalence of comorbidity increased in 3 years of lookback periods, there was no significant improvement compared to 1 year of a lookback period. Conclusions : In a health outcome study for patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using National Health Insurance Database, the Charlson comorbidity index was easy to apply without significant difference in predictability compared to the other methods. The one year of observation period was adequate to adjust the comorbidity. Further work to select adequate comorbidity measurements and lookback periods on other diseases and procedures are needed.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.71-78
• /
• 2016

The value of using health insurance claim database is continuously rising in healthcare research. In studies where comorbidities act as a confounder, comorbidity adjustment holds importance. Yet researchers are faced with a myriad of options without sufficient information on how to appropriately adjust comorbidity. The purpose of this study is to assist in selecting an appropriate index, look back period, and data range for comorbidity adjustment. No consensus has been formed regarding the appropriate index, look back period and data range in comorbidity adjustment. This study recommends the Charlson comorbidity index be selected when predicting the outcome such as mortality, and the Elixhauser's comorbidity measures be selected when analyzing the relations between various comorbidities and outcomes. A longer look back period and inclusion of all diagnoses of both inpatient and outpatient data led to increased prevalence of comorbidities, but contributed little to model performance. Limited data range, such as the inclusion of primary diagnoses only, may complement limitations of the health insurance claim database, but could miss important comorbidities. This study suggests that all diagnoses of both inpatients and outpatients data, excluding rule-out diagnosis, be observed for at least 1 year look back period prior to the index date. The comorbidity index, look back period, and data range must be considered for comorbidity adjustment. To provide better guidance to researchers, follow-up studies should be conducted using the three factors based on specific diseases and surgeries.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제19권11호
• /
• pp.126-136
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 머신러닝을 활용하여 급성 뇌졸중 퇴원 환자의 중증도 보정 사망 예측 모형 개발을 목적으로 시행하였다. 전국 단위의 퇴원손상심층조사 2006~2015년 자료 중 한국표준질병사인분류(Korean standard classification of disease-KCD 7)에 따라 뇌졸중 코드 I60-I63에 해당하는 대상자를 추출하여 분석하였다. 동반질환 중증도 보정 도구로는 Charlson comorbidity index(CCI), Elixhauser comorbidity index(ECI), Clinical classification software(CCS)의 3가지 도구를 사용하였고 중증도 보정 모형 예측 개발은 로지스틱회귀분석, 의사결정나무, 신경망, 서포트 벡터 머신 기법을 활용하여 비교해 보았다. 뇌졸중 환자의 동반질환으로는 ECI에서는 합병증을 동반하지 않은 고혈압(hypertension, uncomplicated)이 43.8%로, CCS에서는 본태성고혈압(essential hypertension)이 43.9%로 다른 질환에 비해 가장 월등하게 높은 것으로 나타났다. 동반질환 중중도 보정 도구를 비교해 본 결과 CCI, ECI, CCS 중 CCS가 가장 높은 AUC값으로 분석되어 가장 우수한 중증도 보정 도구인 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 CCS, 주진단, 성, 연령, 입원경로, 수술유무 변수를 포함한 중증도 보정 모형 개발 AUC값은 로지스틱 회귀분석의 경우 0.808, 의사결정나무 0.785, 신경망 0.809, 서포트 벡터 머신 0.830로 분석되어 가장 우수한 예측력을 보인 것은 서포트 벡터머신 기법인 것으로 최종 확인되었고 이러한 결과는 추후 보건의료정책 수립에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.527-540
• /
• 2011

Some patients tend to visit tertiary hospitals instead of non-tertiary hospitals for minor illnesses, which is a chronic problem within the Korean health care delivery system. In order to reduce the number of patients with minor severity diseases unnecessarily utilizing the tertiary medical services in Korea, the Ministry of Health and Welfare raised the outpatient co-insurance rate for the tertiary hospitals in July, 2009. Another increase in the prescription drug co-insurance rate by the general and tertiary hospitals is scheduled to take place in the second half of 2011. An increase in copayments may discourage the utilization rate of medical services among the underprivileged or patients who require complicated procedures. This study aims to analyze the diabetic patients' utilization rates of tertiary hospitals according to the Comorbidity score. Diabetic patients' data was gathered from the Health Insurance Claims Records in the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service between 2007-2009. Comorbidity scores are measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Elixhauser Index. Chi-square and logistic regressions were performed to compare the utilization rates of both insulin-dependents (n=94,026) and non-insulin-dependents (n=1,424,736) in tertiary hospitals. The higher Comorbidity outcomes in the insulin-dependent diabetic patients who didn't visit tertiary hospitals compared to those who did, was expected. However, after adjusting the gender, age, location, first visits and complications, the groups that scored >=1 on the comorbidity scale utilized the tertiary hospitals more than the O score group. Non-insulin-diabetic patients with higher Comorbidity scores visited tertiary hospitals more than patients who received lower grades. This study found that patients suffering from severe diabetes tend to frequently visit the tertiary hospitals in Korea. This result implied that it is important for Korea to improve the quality of its primary health care as well as to consider a co-insurance rate increase.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.217-230
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 기존 동반질환을 이용한 중증도 보정 방법의 제한점을 보완하기 위해 급성심근경색증 환자의 맞춤형 중증도 보정방법을 개발하고, 이의 타당성을 평가하기 위해 수행되었다. 이를 위하여 질병관리본부에서 2006년부터 2015년까지 10년간 수집한 퇴원손상심층조사 자료 중 주진단이 급성심근경색증인 한국표준질병사인분류(KCD-7) 코드 I20.0~I20.9의 대상자를 추출하였고, 동반질환 중증도 보정 도구로는 기존 활용되고 있는 CCI(Charlson comorbidity index), ECI(Elixhauser comorbidity index)와 새로이 제안하는 CCS(Clinical Classification Software)를 사용하였다. 이에 대한 중증도 보정 사망예측모형 개발을 위하여 머신러닝 기법인 로지스틱 회귀분석, 의사결정나무, 신경망, 서포트 벡터 머신기법을 활용하여 비교하였고 각각의 AUC(Area Under Curve)를 이용하여 개발된 모형을 평가하였다. 이를 평가한 결과 중증도 보정도구로는 CCS 가 가장 우수한 것으로 나타났으며, 머신러닝 기법 중에서는 서포트 벡터 머신을 이용한 모형의 예측력이 가장 우수한 것으로 확인되었다. 이에 향후 의료서비스 결과평가 등 중증도 보정을 위한 연구에서는 본 연구에서 제시한 맞춤형 중증도 보정방법과 머신러닝 기법을 활용하도록 하는 것을 제안한다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.3-10
• /
• 2015

Background: Previous studies showed differences in healthcare utilization among insurance types. This study aimed to analyze the difference in healthcare utilization for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty inpatients by insurance types after controlling factors affecting healthcare utilization using propensity score matching (PSM). Methods: The 2011 national inpatient sample based on health insurance claims data was used for analysis. PSM was used to control factors influencing healthcare utilization except insurance types. Length of stay and total charges were used as healthcare utilization variables. Patients were divided into National Health Insurance (NHI) and Medical Aid (MA) patients. Factors representing inpatients (gender, age, admission sources, and Elixhauser comorbidity index) and hospitals (number of doctors, number of beds, and location of hospitals) were used as covariates in PSM. Results: Tertiary hospitals didn't show significant difference in length of stay and total charges after PSM between two insurance types. However, MA patients showed significantly longer length of stay than that of NHI patients after PSM in general hospitals. Multivariate regression analysis provided that admission sources, Elixhauser comorbidity index, insurance types, number of doctors, and location of hospitals (province) had significant influences on the length of stay in general hospitals. Conclusion: Study results provided evidences that healthcare utilization was differed by insurance types in general hospitals. Health policy makers will need to prepare interventions to influence the healthcare utilization differences between insurance types.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.343-351
• /
• 2016

Background: This study aims to analyze the effects of insurance types on the medical service uses for heart failure inpatients using propensity score matching (PSM). Methods: 2014 National inpatient sample based on health insurance claims data was used in the analysis. PSM was applied to control factors influencing the service uses except insurance types. Negative binomial regression was used after PSM to analyze factors that had influences on the service uses among inpatients. Subjects were divided by health insurance type, national health insurance (NHI) and medical aid (MA). Total charges and length of stay were used to represent the medical service uses. Covariance variables in PSM consist of sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, Elixhauser comorbidity index) and hospital characteristics (hospital types, number of beds, location, number of doctors per 50 beds). These variables were also used as independent variables in negative binomial regression. Results: After the PSM, length of stay showed statistically significant difference on medical uses between insurance types. Negative binomial regression provided that insurance types, Elixhauser comorbidity index, and number of doctors per 50 beds were significant on the length of stay. Conclusion: This study provided that the service uses, especially length of stay, were differed by insurance types. Health policy makers will be required to prepare interventions to narrow the gap of the service uses between NHI and MA.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제13권12호
• /
• pp.245-257
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 복합만성질환 입원환자를 대상으로 중증도 보정 사망 예측모형을 개발하고, 중증도 보정 사망비의 변이 요인을 규명하여 변이를 줄일 수 있는 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 퇴원손상심층조사 자료 2008년부터 2010년까지 자료를 수집하고 주진단이 만성질환이면서 주진단을 포함하여 2개 이상의 만성질환을 보유한 30세 이상의 복합만성질환 입원환자 110,700건을 최종 연구대상으로 선정하였다. 예측 모형 개발 시 데이터마이닝 기법(로지스틱회귀분석, 의사결정나무, 신경망 기법)을 적용하였다. 본 연구에서는 Elixhauser comorbidity index 동반상병 보정지수를 이용하여 의사결정나무분석으로 복합만성질환 입원환자의 중증도 보정 사망 예측모형을 개발하였다. 복합만성질환 입원환자의 의료기관 중증도 보정 사망비(HSMR)를 산출 한 결과 진료비 지불방법별, 병상규모별, 의료기관소재지별로 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 상기 분석결과를 바탕으로 국가적 차원에서 복합만성질환 입원환자의 사망비를 효율적으로 관리하여 의료의 질 향상과 증가하는 의료비 부담 감소를 위해 지속적인 관심과 노력을 기울여야 할 것이다.

• 보건의료산업학회지
• /
• 제8권4호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in the outcome for CABG according to whether hospitals provided heart related surgeries. The 2011 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and inpatient quality indicator principles from the Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) were used for analysis. Hospitals were divided into three groups according to the surgeries they provided. The length of stay and in-hospital deaths were adjusted for the differences in risks. ANOVA was performed to examine the differences for the risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rate and risk-adjusted length of stay among the three groups. The analysis results showed that hospitals providing CABG, PTCA, and PHS had lower risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rates or similar risk-adjusted lengths of stay compared to those of hospitals providing only CABG. However, the three groups did not have statistically significant differences in outcome indicators. Another study will be needed with a larger sample.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.1739-1750
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 의료서비스의 결과지표인 의료기관 중증도 보정 사망비(HSMR)를 산출하고, 비교하여 행정자료를 이용한 의료서비스 결과를 평가할 수 있는 방안을 마련하고자 수행되었다. 이를 위해서 질병관리본부의 2007-2008년의 퇴원손상환자 63,664건의 자료를 분석하였다. 중증도 보정모형 개발을 위해 데이터마이닝을 이용한 의사결정나무와 로지스틱 회귀분석을 실시하였으며, 최종 모형으로 선정된 로지스틱 회귀분석에는 성별, 재원일수, Elixhauser 상병지수, 입원경로, 주상병 변수가 포함되었다. 퇴원시 사망에 영향을 끼치는 이러한 변수를 보정 후 병원간의 중증도 보정 사망비(HSMR)를 비교한 결과 병원간의 중증도 보정 사망비(HSMR)는 차이가 있는 것으로 나타남에 따라 병원의 의료서비스 수준 차이가 있는 것이 확인되었다(HSMR 범위: 55.6-201.6). 본 연구를 통하여 병원간의 퇴원시 사망률을 비교할 수 있는 방법이 개발되었으므로 향후에 이를 이용하여 다양한 의료의 질 향상 활동을 할 수 있는 방안을 마련하여야 할 것이다.