• Korean Architects
• /
• s.573
• /
• pp.78-91
• /
• 2017

• Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.3-15
• /
• 2009

In the swirl of change in the world, Media, the development of information technology, and the enterprise-oriented capitalism have tied the world as one unit, and have entered the period of adaptation. With the view of introspection of these concepts, this paper is mainly written by the theory of "matter as the content" with exploration of the design of essence and scientific approach. The design process is the condensational process which is developed by the exchange of reason and sensibility. This process, which is characterized by the objective manipulation of a given condition and the intervention of extrapolation, is the new way of thinking and approach rather than the concept of the way and means. The research of this paper is based on paintings and the analysis of essential experiments in design, the definition of the terms of content in the view of philosophy and design, and the analysis of the cases in architecture and spacial design. As a result, this paper shows that these designs are not just "Simulacre" but the essential eidos, and "content" is the core of these designs which can produce prototype as machine. Also, these designs can relatively be the persuasive methodology for the reflexive modernization.

• Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal
• /
• v.14 no.6 s.53
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this paper is to understand the meaning of 'institution' in Louis Kahn's architecture and to reveal that it is expressed through singularity and commonality, which have two aspects; formal-material(eidos-hyle) aspect and phenomenological aspect. Under these recognitions, this paper shows the detail analysis on design process of Phillips Exeter Academy Library, focusing on his writings and sketches. The results are as follows. First, the basic form is maintained through the design process of the Exeter library, and it is derived from the consideration of the human activities in the library. And second, each 'room' of the library acquires its singularity through structure and light. And the 'plan' is based on the commonality inherent in the singularity of each room. And the last, singularity and commonality are revealed not only In the relation of architectural elements but also In the relation with man and architecture.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.119-145
• /
• 2001

아리스토텔레스의 논리학은 그 도구적, 방법론적 성격 때문에 보통 "organon"이라고 불린다. 많은 아리스토텔레스 연구자들은, 그의 논리학 이론들이 그가 손댄 여러 분야의 연구에서 정밀 도구 구실을 하는지를 밝히는 데 몰두해 왔다. 지난 30년 넘는 세월 동안 아리스토텔레스 연구를 이 끌어왔던 논의 가운데 하나인, "genos"와 "eidos"의 쓰임에 논의도 바로 그런 연구 전통에 잇닿아 있다. 이 논의는 요즘 일단락된 것으로 받아들여지고 있다. 아리스토텔레스의 논리학에 나오는, 게노스와 에이도스에 의한 분류는 그의 생물학 연구에서는 별 가치가 없다는 것이 일반적인 의견이다. 생물학 연구에서는 문제의 두 개념이 논리학에서처럼 "유"와 "종"의 뜻으로 쓰이는 것이 아니라 상대적인 개념으로 쓰이며, 그렇기 때문에 생물 분류와 무관하다는 말이다. 하지만 문제의 두 개념들이 등장하는 구절들을 문헌학적인 방법을 써서 분석해 보면, 이런 일반적인 의견은 별 근거가 없는 것으로 드러난다: 생물학에서 eidos는 개별자들을 포함하는 종을 가리키는 개념으로, 절대적으로 쓰인다. genos의 경우는 그 쓰임이 좀 더 복잡하지만, 아리스토텔레스가 생물학에서 내세우는 생물의 형태론적 구 분과 관련해서 쓰일 때는 언제나 "유"를 뜻한다. 그런 점에서 genos와 eidos는 본질적으로 생물 분류에 쓰인 개념들이다. 이런 사실은 곧 아리스토텔레스의 논리학이 그의 생물학 연구에서 유용한 도구로서 쓰임을 보여주는 하나의 증거이다.

• Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association
• /
• v.13 no.8
• /
• pp.199-207
• /
• 2019

One philosopher said that knowing the identity of one clump of grass on the roadside could reveal all the mysteries of the universe. If you know one, you can know two. If you know two, you can know three. If you know the form, you can know the whole. If you know the image(eidos), you can know the non-image, life, and death. But we are wandering in a dream because we don't know the one clump of grass, "One". For a long time I have been searching for a road to know "One". While studying of the process searching the truth, not only do we reveal logic development making One a language, but also we would like to provide the application of cultural contents applied to that One.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.129
• /
• pp.291-313
• /
• 2014

The aim of this paper is to clarify the Aristotle's conception of change(kinesis). Aristotle defines the change as a process which actualize a potentiality. From Aristotle's definition of the change, a number of consequences flow directly about how to conceptualize it. First, the change is fundamentally directional. Second, if we do not know what the change is directed toward, we do not understand what the change is. Third, everything that changes is caused to change by a distinct cause of change, a changer. Fourth, there is a single actualization of cause and subject of the change. All change, for Aristotle, is the change of an enduring subject. And all change occur in the infinite(to apeiron) which is time, space, matter. It would be absurd to equate the whole and the infinite, for that would be to say that the unlimited had a limit. The infinite does not contain, but in so far as it is infinite, is contained. And due at least in part to its potentiality, the infinite is unknowable. Because it lacks a form. The infinite traditionally derived its dignity from being thought of as a whole in which everything is contained. But Aristotle removes the infinite from its position of majesty. Aristotle's this idea was a revolution in philosophical perspective.