• Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.41-48
• /
• 2008

The valuation of biodiversity is a fundamental step in conservation. The useful framework for analysing the economic value of biological resources is that of total economic value (TEV) and TEV comprises both use and non-use values, the former related to an actual use made of the resource, the latter to a willingness to pay for the resource independently of any use made of it. There are several valuation approacher in environmental economics literature. However, stated preference approach should be introduced for valuation of biodiversity because it can estimate non-use value as well as use value. Contingent Valuation and Conjoint Analysis are representative methods in stated preference and Conjoint Analysis can be more useful for valuation of biodiversity. Futhermore, the combination of ecology and economics to assess biodiversity leads to an integrated framework. Thus, interdisciplinary work is required, involving both economists and ecologists transferring elements or even theories and models from one discipline to another and transforming them for their specific, mutually consistent purpose.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 2005년도 27회 하계학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.24-43
• /
• 2005

On industry highly developed and competition with each company, technology is considered as the one of the most significant variables in the era of technology competition. So, the needs of technology valuation and valuating technology competitiveness are increasing to measure value of company. However, in many cases of valuation tools, elaborate valuation technique is required all the more by reason of difficulty of defining the valuation target, the valuation perspective and the purpose of valuation. This study tried to define valuation framework of technology competitiveness for technology intensive small medium venture company to valuate technology environment and company's capability related with technology synthetically as well as technology itself which company uses. And also the purpose of technology valuation, the purpose of technology competitiveness, basic elements of technology valuation, trend of technology valuation in major countries including Korea are presented and analyzed.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.545-557
• /
• 2003

양분형 조건부가치평가모형의 준모수적 추정 방법을 소위 회귀함수 1차 도함수의 밀도가중평균(density weighted average derivative or regression function) 추정을 응용하여 제안한다. 논문에서 제안된 준모수 추정량의 소표본 특성은 몬데칼로 시뮬레이션 결과를 제시함으로써 간접적으로 나타난다. 또 추정량을 동강보존을 위한 지불용의액을 조사한 조건부가치평가자료에 실제 적용함으로써 현실 적용 가능성을 보여준다.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.515-545
• /
• 2001

This paper introduces the least absolute deviations estimation of the contingent valuation model, which corresponds to the semi-parametric estimation of discrete choice models by Manski (1975, 1985) and Lee (1992). The least absolute deviations estimation is more robust to mis-specified distributional assumptions in the estimation of the contingent valuation model, compared to the maximum likelihood estimation. The full identification and strong consistency of the estimation are proved and its application to different formats of contingent valuation survey data is discussed. Simulation studies are designed to evaluate its operational characteristics including computational strategies, small sample properties and the efficiency gain of a follow-up question. The bias and efficiency of least absolute deviations and maximum likelihood estimation are compared in the presence of heteroskedasticity.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.885-919
• /
• 2006

본 연구는 환경 비시장가치 평가에서 일반적으로 통용되는 두 가지 '믿음'을 재조명하고 그 단점과 해결책을 고찰한다. 이 믿음은 (1) 지불의사액(WTP)이 비시장 선호도의 타당한 추정치라는 것과, (2) WTP를 설명함에 있어 외생변수(exogenous variables)의 기여도는 인정하면서도 내생변수(endogenous variables)는 무시할 수 있다는 것이다. 하지만, 심리행동학과 후생경제학의 최근 관련 문헌조사를 통해서 평가해 볼 때 두 가지 믿음으로부터의 이탈현상이 두드러지게 발견된다, 결론적으로, 이 같은 현상의 주요 원인으로 알려져 있는 응답자 이질성(heterogeneity)에 효과적으로 대처하기 위해서는 소비자의 선택행동을 설명하는 확률효용모델의 구성에 사회경제 변수와 심리태도 변수를 함께 고려하여야 한다. 특히, 측정의 번거로움을 이유로 후자가 무시될 경우 기존 문헌에서 제기된 다양한 편중(bias)에 노출됨으로써 추정치의 신뢰도가 낮아질 수 있다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2003

In the knowledge-based economy, technology valuation of patents, brand name, know-how is presented for as key subject of intangible assets management science. This paper reviews the methods of technology valuation that have been developed by valuation specialists. Also, is talking about the practical application by income approach (DCF) method. The function and role of technology valuation analysts such as the related organizations and the reference of foreign organization is appeared through the examples.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 2002

A company's market value-added, which equals the excess of a company's market capitalization over it s book value, is used as one of the measures for intangible assets valuation in accounting literature. One problem with the approach is that the valuation results are affected by severe fluctuations in capital markets. In this paper, we propose an approach using the Kalman filter for intangible assets valuation. We apply this method to data of Korean electronic companies.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.35-54
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to compare the valuation of technology firms in the KOSPI and KOSDAQ. This study analyzed 224 market reports for KOSDAQ firms and 602 reports for KOSPI firms. We compare the two markets under 3 definitions on the accuracy of stock price forecasting. Findings are as follows: Although PER multiples is the most used method of valuation, KOSDAQ valuation more heavily relies on the method than KOSPI valuation. In stock market, the period of earnings forecasting is mostly 2-3 years. Multiples of KOSDAQ is generally higher than those of KOSPI. Even for technology firms, valuation in KOSPI mostly relies on earnings of the company, but that in KOSDAQ mostly relies on relative price. In stock price forecasting, generally overestimation prevails. Moreover, forecasting of KOSPI reports is more accurate than that of KOSDAQ reports. ROE and COE of KOSDAQ firms are generally higher than those of KOSPI firms.

• 자원ㆍ환경경제연구
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.179-214
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 한강 수계의 수변경관 및 생태계의 보전 가치를 이중양분선택법에 의한 조건부 가치평가법 (Contingent Valuation Method, CVM)을 사용하여 추정하였다. 음이 아닌 지불의사를 구하기 위해 지수지불의사 모형을 사용하였는데 이 모형이 특히 이중양분선택법에서 매우 중요한 것으로 분석되었다. 한강수계권역의 경관 및 생태계 보전에 대한 총 지불의사는 연간 약 7,055억원으로 추정되었다. 이는 한강 등 수계권역의 수변경관 및 생태계 보전을 위하여 필요한 예산규모가 더욱 확대될 필요성이 있음을 시사한다고 해석된다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제17권7호
• /
• pp.55-63
• /
• 2019

Purpose - This paper examines the value relevance of socially responsible activities in the Korean retail firms. Recent studies predict positive relationships between socially responsible activities and the value of corporation. Research design, data, and methodology - We use the environmental score, social score, governance score and the sum of these three scores to represent a fim's effectiveness of socially responsible activities. These scores are published by the Korean Corporate Governance Service. This paper adopts a share price valuation model to evaluate the effect of socially responsible activities on a firm's share price, which controls for the book value of assets and current earnings. The ordinary least square method is employed to examine the relationship. The sample of Korea retail firms is examined from 2011 to 2016. We also conduct sub-sample analysis based on the categorization of chaebol affiliates and non-chaebol affiliates. Results - The entire sample analysis finds neither negatively nor positively significant relationship between socially responsible activities and the value of a corporation. In contrast, our examinations find a significantly positive valuation effect of social score within non-chaebol retail firms. Conclusions - The results weakly support the positive valuation effect of socially responsible activities. The results are consistent with recent studies that highlight heterogeneous effects of socially responsible activities on corporate policies and valuation.