• Earthquakes and Structures
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.483-503
• /
• 2016

This study aims to evaluate seismic performance of existing low and mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings by comparing their displacement capacities and displacement demands under selected ground motions experienced in Turkey as well as demand spectrum provided in 2007 Turkish Earthquake Code for design earthquake with 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years for soil class Z3. It should be noted that typical residential buildings are designed according to demand spectrum of 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. Three RC building sets as 2-, 4- and 7-story, are selected to represent reference low-and mid-rise buildings located in the high seismicity region of Turkey. The selected buildings are typical beam-column RC frame buildings with no shear walls. The outcomes of detailed field and archive investigation including approximately 500 real residential RC buildings established building models to reflect existing building stock. Total of 72 3-D building models are constructed from the reference buildings to include the effects of some properties such as structural irregularities, concrete strength, seismic codes, structural deficiencies, transverse reinforcement detailing, and number of story on seismic performance of low and mid-rise RC buildings. Capacity curves of building sets are obtained by nonlinear static analyses conducted in two principal directions, resulting in 144 models. The inelastic dynamic characteristics are represented by "equivalent" Single-Degree-of- Freedom (ESDOF) systems using obtained capacity curves of buildings. Nonlinear time history analysis is used to estimate displacement demands of representative building models idealized with (ESDOF) systems subjected to the selected ground motion records from past earthquakes in Turkey. The results show that the significant number of pre-modern code 4- and 7-story buildings exceeds LS performance level while the modern code 4- and 7-story buildings have better performances. The findings obviously indicate the existence of destructive earthquakes especially for 4- and 7-story buildings. Significant improvements in the performance of the buildings per modern code are also obvious in the study. Almost one third of pre-modern code buildings is exceeding LS level during records in the past earthquakes. This observation also supports the building damages experienced in the past earthquake events in Turkey.

• Earthquakes and Structures
• /
• 제14권5호
• /
• pp.411-424
• /
• 2018

This study explores the inelastic behavior of systems with flexible base. The use of a single degree of freedom system (ESDOF) with equivalent ductility to represent the response of flexible base systems is discussed. Two different equations to compute equivalent ductility are proposed, one which includes the contribution of rigid body components, and other based on the overstrength of the structure. In order to asses the accuracy of ESDOF approach with the proposed equations, the behavior of a 10-story regular building with reinforced concrete (RC) moment resisting frames is studied. Local and global ductility capacity and demands are used to study the modifications introduced by base flexibility. Three soil types are considered with shear wave velocities of 70, 100 and 250 m/s. Soil-foundation stiffness is included with a set of springs on the base (impedance functions). Capacity curves of the building are computed with pushover analysis. In addition, non linear time history analysis are used to asses the ductility demands. Results show that ductility capacity of the soil-structure system including rigid body components is reduced. Base flexibility does not modify neither yield and maximum base shear. Equivalent ductility estimated with the proposed equations is fits better the results of the numerical model than the one considering elastoplastic behavior. Modification of beams ductility demand due to base flexibility are not constant within the structure. Some elements experience reduced ductility demands while other elements experience increments when flexible base is considered. Soil structure interaction produces changes in the relation between yield strength reduction factor and structure ductility demand. These changes are dependent on the spectral shape and the period of the system with fixed and flexible base.

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.71-80
• /
• 2003

구조물의 내진 성능을 정확히 평가하기 위해서는 비선형 시각 이력 해석이 필요하지만 실용성과 단순성 측면에서 약산법이 대안이 될 수 있으며, 다층 구조물을 등가 단자유도계로 치환할 때 다층 구조물의 모드벡터는 구조물이 탄성 또는 탄소성 상태에 상관없이 탄성 상태에서의 모드 형상으로 가정되지만, 항복이 발생한 후 증가하는 하중단계에서 구조물은 비탄성으로 되기 때문에 변위 모드 특성들도 변화된다. 본 논문은 항복 이후의 구조물의 모드 변화를 고려한 비선형 변위모드를 이용하여 다자유도계를 등가 단자유도계로 변환하는 방법을 제시하였으며, 변환된 등가 단자유도계의 변위응답을 근거로 추정한 복합 구조물의 최상층 변위와 실제 지진교란을 받는 복합 구조물의 비선형 동적해석에 의한 최상층 변위를 비교함으로서 복합구조물의 지진응답예측을 위한 비선형 변위모드법의 적용성과 신뢰성을 검토하였다.

• 한국지진공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지진공학회 2005년도 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.316-323
• /
• 2005

The capacity spectrum method (CSM) can be used for the evaluation of inelastic maximum response of structures and has been recently used in the seismic design using the incorporation of pushover analysis and response spectrum method. To efficiently evaluate seismic performance of multi-degree-of freedom (MDOF) bridge structures, it is important that the equivalent response of MDOF bridge structures be calculated. In this study to calculate the equivalent response of MDOF system, equivalent responses are obtained by the using Song method, N2 method and Calvi method. Also, these are applied the CSM method and seismic performance of bridge according to the ESDOF method are compared and evaluated.

• 산업기술연구
• /
• 제26권B호
• /
• pp.119-126
• /
• 2006

Capacity spectrum method(CSM) of ATC-40(1996) and displacement coefficient method(DCM)of FEMA-273(1997) are applied to evaluate the seismic performance of bridges. In this study, equivalent response is obtained from nonlinear static analysis for the 3spans continues bridge and nonlinear maximum displacement response is calculated using CSM and DCM. Nonlinear maximum displacement response of DCM is larger than this of CSM. It is method that DCM can evaluate target displacement and ductility of structural to be easy and simple, but tend to overestimate the maximum displacement response. Therefore, this method is mainly used at preparation design level to evaluate the structural response. It is not desirable to evaluate the seismic performance using DCM.

• 산업기술연구
• /
• 제25권A호
• /
• pp.15-22
• /
• 2005

In order to evaluate seismic performance of multi-degree-of-freedom bridge structure, moderate lateral load distribution methods using the pushover analysis were developed by many researchers. One of important variables to improve an accuracy of pushover analysis is lateral load distribution. In this study, pushover analyses were performed using the five types of lateral load distribution and seismic performances were evaluated by capacity spectrum method (CSM). To verify an accuracy of suggested lateral load distribution, the maximum displacement estimates by the CSM were compared to those by inelastic time history analysis.

• Structural Engineering and Mechanics
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.239-255
• /
• 2009

In the companion paper, a simple but effective analysis procedure termed an Improved Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA) is proposed to estimate the seismic capacities of multi-span continuous bridge structures on the basis of the modal pushover analysis, which considers all the dynamic modes of a structure. In contrast to previous studies, the IMPA maintains the simplicity of the capacity-demand curve method and gives a better estimation of the maximum dynamic response in a bridge structure. Nevertheless, to verify its applicability, additional parametric studies for multi-span continuous bridges with large differences in the length of adjacent piers are required. This paper, accordingly, concentrates on a parametric study to review the efficiency and limitation in the application of IMPA to bridge structures through a correlation study between various analytical models including the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom method (ESDOF) and modal pushover analysis (MPA) that are usually used in the seismic design of bridge structures. Based on the obtained numerical results, this paper offers practical guidance and/or limitations when using IMPA to predict the seismic response of a bridge effectively.

• 한국전산구조공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국전산구조공학회 2007년도 정기 학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.795-800
• /
• 2007

In the previous study, a simple but effective analysis procedure, named as an Improved Modal Pushover Analysis (IMPA) was proposed to estimates the seismic capacities of multi-span continuous bridge structures, on the basis of the modal pushover analysis which considers all the dynamic modes of a structure. Differently from other previous studies, IMPA maintains the simplicity of the capacity-demand curve method and also gives a better estimation of the maximum dynamic response of a structure. Nevertheless, its applicability has never been approved for multi-span continuous bridges with large differences in the length of their adjacent piers. This paper, accordingly, concentrates on a parametric study to verify the efficiency and limitation in application of IMPA through a correlation study between various analytical models including the Equivalent Single Degree Of Freedom (ESDOF) and Modal Pushover Analysis (MPA) usually used in the seismic design of structures. Based on the obtained numerical results, this paper introduces a practical guidance and/or limitation for using IMPA to predict the seismic response of a bridge effectively.

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.69-80
• /
• 2008

본 연구에서는 중고층 건물과 같이 고차모드의 영향이 커지는 구조물의 지진에 대한 성능점을 간략하고 정확하게 구할 수 있는 개선된 능력스펙트럼법을 제안한다. 능력스펙트럼법은 주어진 지진의 응답스펙트럼과 다자유도 구조물을 변환한 등가 단자유도 시스템을 이용하여 지진으로 인하여 발생하는 지붕층의 최대 비탄성변위를 간략하게 구하는 방법이다. 제안된 방법에서는 구조물의 탄성 및 비탄성 동적해석을 수행하지 않고, 기존의 능력스펙트럼법에서 요구되는 정적푸쉬오버해석과 탄성변위를 이용하여 비탄성변위를 예측하는데, 기존 연구에서 개발한 $C_R$을 이용한다. 본 연구는 제안한 방법의 정확도를 평가하기 위해 LA 지역의 3, 9, 20층 철골모멘트저항골조를 선택한다. 이 건물들의 지진에 대한 각 층별 최대 층간변위비를 개발한 CSM으로 구하고, 이를 비선형 응답이력해석(NL-RHA)으로 구한 결과와 비교하였다. 사용한 지진은 재현주기 475년과 2475년의 위험수준에 대한 각각 20개의 지진집단들이다. 또한 본 연구에서는 ATC-40에 제시된 CSM 방법과 N2 방법으로 구한 각 건물의 최대 층간변위비도 비교한다. 개발된 CSM은 기존에 개발된 방법에 비하여 보다 정확한 최대 층간변위비를 예측하는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.95-111
• /
• 1998

본 연구에서 구조요소 및 구조계에 대한 지진손상 해석방법의 개념 및 과정을 연구하였다. 구조요소에 대한 지진손상도 해석은 구조요소나 단자유도계에 관한 기존의 방법으로 가장 널리사용되고 있는 Park & Ang 방법에 의하여 예제구조물에 대하여 수행하였다. 구조계에 대한 지진손상도 해석을 수행하기 위해서는 두 가지의 과정을 사용하였다. 첫 번째 과정은 구조계에 해당하는 지진응답을 구조계 대표응답법과 등가단자유도계 응답법을 이용하여 구한 후, 구조계의 지진손상도는 기존의 단자유도계나 구조요소에 관한 방법을 이용하여 구조계의 지진응답으로부터 구한다. 두 번째 구조요소에 대한 지진손상도 해석결과를 손상지수 조합법을 이용하여 선형적으로 조합하여 구조계의 지진손상도를 구한다. 각 방법의 유용성은 몇 개의 다른 지진과 예제구조물에 대하여 비교를 통하여 연구하였다.