• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.149-158
• /
• 2008

Plant construction is being a motive power of national economic growth, because it is a higher value-added business which has enormous influence through other industry. But, plant projects management of the domestic company was poor. So, the development of EPC Business Process Management method has been encouraged. Therefore, this paper performed several researches for setting up the EPC Business Process Management Model for improving plant project management. And the details are as follows. First of all, this study collected the work procedure manuals of 12 large-sized international construction companies. Secondly, from the analyzing gathered EPC work procedure manuals, issues of work procedure manuals were analyzed and improvement plans were drawn out. Basis on this, This study presents a method to improve project management for EPC plant project. 'The Work Procedure Matrix for EPC Management' and 'Key Unit Works for EPC Management' were drawn out by using overseas construction management theories and international regulations. In addition, 'The EPC Business Process Management Models' reformed to the Business process method, that is the set of specifications, documents and procedures used to manage the EPC plant project. And it describes how the EPC work procedure manuals will be used. Finally, this study suggests the model of EPC Business Process Management System. The framework of Plant project management can be clarified by using 'The Work Procedure Matrix'. And 'Key Unit Works' are used to organize the work procedure needed to improve plant projects management. The results of this study will help to improve in project management efficiency for plant construction.

• Proceedings of the SAREK Conference
• /
• 2009.06a
• /
• pp.338-343
• /
• 2009

Promoting policy to involve plant EPC companies for package deal has been studied to acquisite overseas energy resources. The effectiveness of the package deal with the plant EPC companies has not been successful because participation of the plant EPC companies is very low. It is difficult for the plant EPC companies to join the packaged deal due to the lack of the whole responsibility organization to support that plant EPC companies participate in package deal. The followings are suggested as the ways to promote the participation of the plant EPC companies for package deal in this study. 1) financial and policy support of governmen 2) specialization of the advanced countries.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2015.10a
• /
• pp.426-429
• /
• 2015

최근 급격히 증가한 모바일 기기로 인하여 발생되는 데이터/제어 트래픽은 LTE/EPC 네트워크에서 중앙에 과다한 트래픽 수용문제가 중요 이슈로 부각되고 있다. 기존의 Centralized Mobility Management(CMM) 기반의 LTE/EPC 네트워크에서 Mobility Anchor 역할을 수행하는 Packet Data Network Gateway (P-GW)에서는 데이터 트래픽 과부하가 발생한다. 또한 Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) 기반의 LTE/EPC 네트워크에서 분산된 Mobility Anchor 역할을 수행하는 PDN Edge Gateway (P-EGW)에서는 제어 트래픽의 과부하가 발생한다. 본 논문에서는 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위하여 CMM 기반과 DMM 기반을 결합한 새로운 Software Defined Network (SDN) 기반의 LTE/EPC 네트워크 이동성 관리 기법을 제안한다. 이를 위하여, P-EGW를 네트워크 내에 분산 배치하고 중앙에 P-GW를 배치한다. SDN 컨트롤러는 EPC의 역할도 수행하며 UE의 이동성에 따라 적절한 CMM 기법과 DMM 기법을 이용하도록 하는 기법을 제안한다. 또한, 제안하는 새로운 LTE/EPC 네트워크 구조와 기존의 CMM기반의 LTE/EPC 네트워크 구조, DMM 기반의 LTE/EPC 네트워크 구조를 핸드오버 지연시간과 데이터 전송시간 측면에서 성능 비교 분석을 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2006.06d
• /
• pp.247-249
• /
• 2006

EPC는 RFID 태그용으로 개발된 차세대 식별코드체계지만 유통물류 분야를 비롯해 전 산업 분야에서 GTIN을 비롯한 EAN/UCC 식별코드도 EPC 체계에 수용될 수 있도록 방안이 마련되어 있어 향 후 바코드를 대체할 것으로 예상된다. 따라서 이 논문에서는 바코드시스템과 메타코딩 체제로서 이미 사용 중인 코드체제와 필요에 의해 새롭게 개발되는 코드체계를 모두 수용할 수 있는 EPC코드시스템에 대하여 고찰하고 농산물코드를 EPC코드로 변환하는 방안에 대하여 기술한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.1299-1302
• /
• 2006

EPC는 RFID 태그용으로 개발된 차세대 식별코드체계지만 유통물류 분야를 비롯해 전 산업분야에서 GTIN을 비롯한 EAN/UCC 식별코드도 EPC 체계에 수용될 수 있도록 방안이 마련되어 있어 향 후 바코드를 대체할 것으로 예상된다. 따라서 이 논문에서는 바코드시스템과 메타코딩 체제로서 이미 사용 중인 코드체제와 필요에 의해 새롭게 개발되는 코드체계를 모두 수용할 수 있는 EPC코드시스템에 대하여 고찰하고 농산물코드를 EPC코드로 변환하는 방안에 대하여 기술한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.70-72
• /
• 2005

최근들어 Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) 태그가 다수의 상품에 부착되고 절러 분야에 적용되기 시작했지만, 비용문제로 인해 인증이나 암호화 같은 보안기능은 고려하지 않고 있다. 보안 기능이 없는 RFID시스템은 개인정보 노굴, 불법 리더의 접근, 위조 태그의 남용과 같은 심각한 부작용을 초래하지만 현 단계에서는 보안기능을 적용하기가 쉽지않다. 절러 기술을 따르는 수동형 태그중 EPCglobal의 EPC Class 1과 Class 1 Generation 2(C1G2)는 산업계의 여러 분야에서 특히, supply-chain 모델에서 사실상 국제표준으로 여겨진다. EPC Class1 수준의 태그는 자체 밧데리를 가지지 않는 수동형 태그이고, 암호 프리미티브를 적용한 알고리즘이나 프로토콜은 제공하지 않는다. EPC Class1 과 EPC C1G2의 유일한 보안 대책으로는 태그를 영원히 동작하지 못하게 하는 Kill 기능이 있다. Kill을 수행한 태그는 RFID 태그로서의 의미가 사라진다. 본 논문에서는 Kill 기능에 대한 EPC Class1 시스템의 취약성을 보이고 또한, EPC C1G2 시스템에서 Kill 관점에서의 보안성을 분석한다.

• Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
• /
• v.8 no.6
• /
• pp.119-137
• /
• 2006

This paper seeks to Combination for Efficient Application of SPC/EPC minimize variability by transferring the output variable to a related process controllable variable, while SPC seeks to reduce variability by detecting and eliminating assignable causes of variation. In the case of product control, a very reasonable objective is to try to minimize the variance of the output deviations from the target or set point. We consider an alternative EPC model with autoregressed disturbance. We compare three control systems; EPC, Cp, SPC combined system with EWMA, CUSUM and Shewhart. This paper shows through simulation that the performance of the integrated model of EPC and SPC, Cp is more preferable than that of EPC.

• Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
• /
• 2002.05a
• /
• pp.81-89
• /
• 2002

EPC seeks to minimize variability by transferring the output variable to a related process input(controllable) variable, while SPC seeks to reduce variability by detecting and eliminating assignable causes of variation. In the case of product control, a very reasonable objective is to try to minimize the variance of the output deviations from the target or set point. We consider an alternative EPC model with second-order autoregressive disturbance. We compare three control systems； EPC, EPC combined with EWMA, and Shewhart. This paper shows through simulation that the performance of the integrated model of EPC and SPC is more preferable than that of EPC.

• Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.277-283
• /
• 2003

EPC seeks to minimize variability by transferring the output variable to a related process input(controllable) variable, while SPC seeks to reduce variability by detecting and eliminating assignable causes of variation. Tn the case of product control, a very reasonable objective is to try to minimize the variance of the output deviations from the target or set point. We consider an alternative EPC model with second-order autoregressed disturbance. We compare three control systems; EPC, EPC combined system with EWMA, CUSUM and Shewhart. This paper shows through simulation that the performance of the integrated model of EPC and SPC is more preferable than that of EPC.

• Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science
• /
• v.4 no.3
• /
• pp.107-122
• /
• 2002

There are two approaches to process control. The one is engineering process control(EPC) which is one of the techniques very widely used in the process industry and based on control theory which aims at keeping the process on target using manipulating variable. The other is statistical process control(SPC) whose main purpose is to look for assignable causes(variability) in the process. To design an integrated or combined scheme of SPC and EPC is gaining recognition in the process experiences for hybrid industry. This paper aims to investigate recent study concerned on the integration of SPC and EPC. First, we consider the difference between SPC and EPC in simple terms and review various models of EPC for integration including evaluation of previous study. Finally, we suggest some prospective research area concerned on the integration of SPC and EPC.