• 해운
• /
• 제10호통권44호
• /
• pp.14-23
• /
• 2007

구주공동체 집행위원회(EC)는 2007년 9월14일부로 해상운송서비스에 관한 EC 조약 제81조의 적용에 관한 지침을 공포했다. 동 지침의 주요골자를 보면, '정기선 운임동맹 포괄면제'를 인정한 규정을 폐지하였으며, 2008년 10월18 일부로 발효된다. 다음은 한국선주협회가 입수한 지침 전문을 정리한 것이다.

• 제품안전
• /
• 제6호통권174호
• /
• pp.52-53
• /
• 2008

• 한국마린엔지니어링학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국마린엔지니어링학회 2005년도 후기학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.92-93
• /
• 2005

A contract for the shipbuilding is usually a complicated and involves statement of rights, obligations and responsibilities which each party agrees vis-a vis the other. The ultimate purpose of the contract is the sale and transfer of the finished ship by the builder to the buyer. Contracts for the construction and sale of ships are categorized as contracts for the sale of goods under English, United States, Germany and some countries law. On the other hand, The shipbuilding contract may be classified, not as a contract of sale but as a contract for work and materials under Korea, Japan and some countries law. Especially, most of countries are now well settled with regard to liability of a manufacturer in tort for physical injury and on the other for pure economic loss to remote owners of chattels. Where there is either a breach of contractual warranty or an implied warranty, there may be admiralty jurisdiction, depending once again on the situs of the event and its relationship to traditional maritime activity. Contract principles will be applied to the first type of warranty and tort principles will be applied to the second. First of all, this thesis is dealt with the contents of contract under English Law. Secondly, this thesis is analysed into the liability of shipbuilder in Products Liability under English, American and Korean Law comparisons. In conclusion, the author tries to give some suggestions as countermeasures of Products Liability to the shipbuilder in Korea.