• 접착 및 계면
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.14-21
• /
• 2014

본 연구에서는 이축압출기와 사출기를 사용하여 폴리유산(PLA)와 폴리부틸렌숙시네이트(PBS) 수지의 함량비를 달리하여 PLA/PBS 블랜드를 제조하고, 그들의 기계적, 열적 특성 및 모폴로지를 조사하였다. PLA/PBS 블랜드의 굴곡강도, 굴곡탄성률, 인장강도 및 인장탄성률과 같은 기계적 특성, 그리고 용융거동, 동역학적 열특성 및 열안정성과 같은 열적 특성이 PLA와 PBS 함량비에 크게 의존하였다. 그러나 PLA/PBS 블랜드의 열변형온도는 PLA 또는 PBS 함량 변화에 크게 영향을 받지 않았다. 또한 PLA/PBS 블랜드의 파단면은 PBS 함량이 증가함에 따라 brittle 양상으로부터 ductile 양상으로 변화되었다.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 1995년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.15.2-22
• /
• 1995

Evaluating stiffness of near-surface materials has been one of the critically important tasks in many civil engineering works. It is the main goal of geotechnical characterization. The so-called deflection-response method evaluates the stiffness by measuring stress-strain behavior of the materials caused by static or dynamic load. This method, however, evaluates the overall stiffness and the stiffness variation with depth cannot be obtained. Furthermore, evaluation of a large-area geotechnical site by this method can be time-consuming, expensive, and damaging to many surface points of the site. Wave-propagation method, on the other hand, measures seismic velocities at different depths and stiffness profile (stiffness change with depth) can be obtained from the measured velocity data. The stiffness profile is often expressed by shear-wave (S-wave) velocity change with depth because S-wave velocity is proportional to the shear modulus. that is a direct indicator of stiffiiess. The crosshole and downhole method measures the seismic velocity by placing sources and receivers (geophones) at different depths in a borehole. Requirement of borehole installation makes this method also time-consuming, expensive, and damaging to the sites. Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Waves (SASW) method places both source and receivers at the surface, and records horizontally-propagating surface waves. Based upon the theory of surfacewave dispersion, the seismic velocities at different depths are calculated by analyzing the recorded surface-wave data. This method can be nondestructive to the sites. However, because only two receivers are used, the method requires multiple measurements with different field setups and, therefore, the method often becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive. Furthermore. the inclusion of noise wavefields cannot be handled properly, and this may cause the results by this method inaccurate. When multi-channel recording method is employed during the measurement of surface-waves, there are several benefits. First, usually single measurement is enough because multiple number (twelve or more) of receivers are used. Second, noise inclusion can be detected by coherency checking on the multi-channel data and handled properly so that it does not decrease the accuracy of the result. Third, various kinds of multi-channel processing techniques can be applied to f1lter unwanted noise wavefields and also to analyze the surface-wavefields more accurately and efficiently. In this way, the accuracy of the result by the method can be significantly improved. Fourth, the entire system of source, receivers, and recording-processing device can be tied into one unit, and the unit can be pulled by a small vehicle, making the survey speed very fast. In all these senses, multi-channel recording of surface waves is best suited for a routine method for geotechnical characterization in most of civil engineering works.