• Asia pacific journal of information systems
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.25-53
• /
• 2013

This study analyzes the effect of Computer Aided Innovation (CAI) to improve R&D Capabilities empirically. Survey was distributed by e-mail and Google Docs, targeting CTO of 235 SMEs. 142 surveys were returned back (rate of return 60.4%) from companies. Survey results from 119 companies (83.8%) which are effective samples except no-response, insincere response, estimated value, etc. were used for statistics analysis. Companies with less than 50billion KRW sales of entire researched companies occupy 76.5% in terms of sample traits. Companies with less than 300 employees occupy 83.2%. In terms of the type of company business Partners (called 'partners with big companies' hereunder) who work with big companies for business occupy 68.1%. SMEs based on their own business (called 'independent small companies') appear to occupy 31.9%. The present status of holding IT system according to traits of company business was classified into partners with big companies versus independent SMEs. The present status of ERP is 18.5% to 34.5%. QMS is 11.8% to 9.2%. And PLM (Product Life-cycle Management) is 6.7% to 2.5%. The holding of 3D CAD is 47.1% to 21%. IT system-holding and its application of independent SMEs seemed very vulnerable, compared with partner companies of big companies. This study is comprised of IT infra and IT Utilization as CAI capacity factors which are independent variables. factors of R&D capabilities which are independent variables are organization capability, process capability, HR capability, technology-accumulating capability, and internal/external collaboration capability. The highest average value of variables was 4.24 in organization capability 2. The lowest average value was 3.01 in IT infra which makes users access to data and information in other areas and use them with ease when required during new product development. It seems that the inferior environment of IT infra of general SMEs is reflected in CAI itself. In order to review the validity used to measure variables, Factors have been analyzed. 7 factors which have over 1.0 pure value of their dependent and independent variables were extracted. These factors appear to explain 71.167% in total of total variances. From the result of factor analysis about measurable variables in this study, reliability of each item was checked by Cronbach's Alpha coefficient. All measurable factors at least over 0.611 seemed to acquire reliability. Next, correlation has been done to explain certain phenomenon by correlation analysis between variables. As R&D capabilities factors which are arranged as dependent variables, organization capability, process capability, HR capability, technology-accumulating capability, and internal/external collaboration capability turned out that they acquire significant correlation at 99% reliability level in all variables of IT infra and IT Utilization which are independent variables. In addition, correlation coefficient between each factor is less than 0.8, which proves that the validity of this study judgement has been acquired. The pair with the highest coefficient had 0.628 for IT utilization and technology-accumulating capability. Regression model which can estimate independent variables was used in this study under the hypothesis that there is linear relation between independent variables and dependent variables so as to identify CAI capability's impact factors on R&D. The total explanations of IT infra among CAI capability for independent variables such as organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability are 10.3%, 7%, 11.9%, 30.9%, and 10.5% respectively. IT Utilization exposes comprehensively low explanatory capability with 12.4%, 5.9%, 11.1%, 38.9%, and 13.4% for organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability respectively. However, both factors of independent variables expose very high explanatory capability relatively for technology-accumulating capability among independent variable. Regression formula which is comprised of independent variables and dependent variables are all significant (P<0.005). The suitability of regression model seems high. When the results of test for dependent variables and independent variables are estimated, the hypothesis of 10 different factors appeared all significant in regression analysis model coefficient (P<0.01) which is estimated to affect in the hypothesis. As a result of liner regression analysis between two independent variables drawn by influence factor analysis for R&D capability and R&D capability. IT infra and IT Utilization which are CAI capability factors has positive correlation to organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, technology-accumulating capability, and collaboration capability with inside and outside which are dependent variables, R&D capability factors. It was identified as a significant factor which affects R&D capability. However, considering adjustable variables, a big gap is found, compared to entire company. First of all, in case of partner companies with big companies, in IT infra as CAI capability, organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, and technology capability out of R&D capacities seems to have positive correlation. However, collaboration capability appeared insignificance. IT utilization which is a CAI capability factor seemed to have positive relation to organization capability, process capability, human resources capability, and internal/external collaboration capability just as those of entire companies. Next, by analyzing independent types of SMEs as an adjustable variable, very different results were found from those of entire companies or partner companies with big companies. First of all, all factors in IT infra except technology-accumulating capability were rejected. IT utilization was rejected except technology-accumulating capability and collaboration capability. Comprehending the above adjustable variables, the following results were drawn in this study. First, in case of big companies or partner companies with big companies, IT infra and IT utilization affect improving R&D Capabilities positively. It was because most of big companies encourage innovation by using IT utilization and IT infra building over certain level to their partner companies. Second, in all companies, IT infra and IT utilization as CAI capability affect improving technology-accumulating capability positively at least as R&D capability factor. The most of factor explanation is low at around 10%. However, technology-accumulating capability is rather high around 25.6% to 38.4%. It was found that CAI capability contributes to technology-accumulating capability highly. Companies shouldn't consider IT infra and IT utilization as a simple product developing tool in R&D section. However, they have to consider to use them as a management innovating strategy tool which proceeds entire-company management innovation centered in new product development. Not only the improvement of technology-accumulating capability in department of R&D. Centered in new product development, it has to be used as original management innovative strategy which proceeds entire company management innovation. It suggests that it can be a method to improve technology-accumulating capability in R&D section and Dynamic capability to acquire sustainable competitive advantage.

• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.157-166
• /
• 2015

목 적 : 사이버나이프 종양 추적 시스템(Cyber-knife tumor tracking system)은 환자 외부에 부착한 LED marker에서 얻어진 실시간 호흡 주기 신호와 호흡에 따라 움직이는 종양의 위치와의 상관관계를 바탕으로 종양의 위치를 미리 예측하고 종양의 움직임을 치료기와 동기화 (Synchronize) 시켜 실시간으로 종양을 추적하며 치료하는 시스템이다. 본 연구의 목적은 사이버나이프 종양 추적 방사선 치료 중 기침이나 수면 등으로 인해 예측 불가능한 갑작스러운 호흡 형태 변화에 따른 종양 추적 방사선 치료 시스템의 정확도를 평가하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 연구에 사용된 호흡 Log 파일은 본원에서 호흡 동조 방사선치료(Respiratory gating radiotherapy)나 사이버나이프 호흡 추적 방사선수술(Cyber-knife tracking radiosurgery)을 받았던 환자의 호흡 Log 파일을 바탕으로, 정현곡선 형태(Sinusoidal pattern)와 갑작스런 변화 형태(Sudden change pattern)의 Log 파일을 이용하여 측정이 가능하도록 재구성하였다. 재구성 된 호흡 Log 파일을 사이버나이프 동적 흉부 팬텀에 입력하여 호흡에 따른 움직임을 구현할 수 있도록 기존 동적 흉부 팬텀의 구동장치를 추가 제작하였고, 호흡의 형태를 팬텀에 적용 시킬 수 있는 프로그램을 개발하였다. 팬텀 내부 표적(Ball cube target)의 움직임은 호흡의 크기에 따라 상하(Superior-Inferior)방향으로 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm 3가지 크기의 변위로 구동하게 하였다. 팬텀 내부 표적에 EBT3 필름 2장을 교차 삽입하여 표적 움직임의 변화에 따라 사이버나이프 제조사에서 제공된 End-to-End(E2E) test를 호흡의 형태에 따라 각각 5회씩 실시하고 측정하였다. 종양 추적 시스템의 정확도는 삽입된 필름을 분석하여 표적 오차(Targeting error)로 나타내었고, 추가로 E2E test가 진행되는 동안 상관관계 오차(Correlation error)를 측정하여 분석하였다. 결 과 : 표적 오차는 정현곡선 호흡 형태일 경우 표적 움직임의 크기가 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm 에 따라 각각 평균 $1.14{\pm}0.13mm$, $1.05{\pm}0.20mm$, $2.37{\pm}0.17mm$이고, 갑작스런 호흡 변화 형태일 경우 각각 평균 $1.87{\pm}0.19mm$, $2.15{\pm}0.21mm$, $2.44{\pm}0.26mm$으로 분석되었다. 표적 추적에 있어 변위 벡터의 길이로 정의할 수 있는 상관관계 오차는 정현곡선 호흡 형태일 경우 표적 움직임의 크기가 5 mm, 10 mm, 20 mm 에 따라 각각 평균 $0.84{\pm}0.01mm$, $0.70{\pm}0.13mm$, $1.63{\pm}0.10mm$이고, 갑작스런 호흡 변화 형태일 경우 각각 평균 $0.97{\pm}0.06mm$, $1.44{\pm}0.11mm$, $1.98{\pm}0.10mm$으로 분석되었다. 두 호흡 형태에서 모두 상관관계 오차 값이 클수록 표적 오차 값이 크게 나타났다. 정현곡선 호흡 형태의 표적 움직임 크기가 20 mm 이상일 경우, 두 오차 값 모두 사이버나이프 제조사의 권고치인 1.5 mm 이상으로 측정되었다. 결 론 : 표적 움직임의 크기가 클수록 표적 오차 값과 상관관계 오차 값이 증가하는 경향이 있었으며, 정현곡선 호흡 형태보다 갑작스런 호흡 변화 형태에서 오차 값이 크게 나타났다. 호흡의 형태가 규칙적인 정현 곡선 형태더라도 표적의 움직임이 클수록 종양 추적 시스템의 정확도가 감소하는 것으로 판단할 수 있다. 사이버나이프 종양 추적 시스템의 알고리즘을 이용하여 치료 시행 시 환자의 기침 등으로 인하여 갑작스럽게 예측 불가능한 호흡 변화가 있는 경우 치료를 멈추고 내부 표적 확인 과정을 재실시 하여야 하며 호흡 형태를 재조정해야 할 필요가 있다. 치료 중 환자가 본인의 호흡 형태를 관찰 할 수 있는 고글 모니터 등을 착용하여 규칙적인 호흡 형태를 유도하는 것이 치료의 정확도는 향상될 수 있다고 판단된다.

• 중소기업연구
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.77-93
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 최근 사회경제적 이슈가 되고 있는 동반성장의 개념과 실천 방향에 대해 논의하고자 한다. 이를 위해 동반성장의 정책적 개념을 살펴보고 유사한 개념인 상생협력과 공생발전과도 비교 분석하고자 한다. 또한 동반성장을 통해 글로벌 경쟁력을 만들어 낸 선진국 사례들로부터 교훈을 찾아내고 우리의 사회 문화적 특성에 맞는 한국형 모델을 제안하고자 한다. 한국형 동반성장 모델은 미국의 시장중심형, 일본의 문화기반형, 유럽의 정책주도형 등의 장점을 융합할 필요가 있다. 이를 위해 한국형 모델은 공동체적 에너지를 창출해내는 한국인의 잠재력 활용, 통제와 자율의 융합형 제도 개선, 미래지향적 협력관계를 위한 기업들의 행동변화 등 세 가지 요인을 핵심으로 할 필요가 있다. 한국형 모델의 실현을 위해 필요한 정부의 역할과 과제, 그리고 동반성장위원회의 역할에 대해서도 논의하고자 한다.