• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제45권2호
• /
• pp.96-106
• /
• 2003

134 Dutch cone (mechanical cone) and 9 piezocone (electronic cone) penetration tests have been performed in the southwestern part of Korea. In general, Dutch cone results may be different from that of piezocone due to the difference in structure of the cones. 6 Dutch cone and piezocone test data which were obtained at the same point respectively, were analyzed and plotted in soil classification chart proposed by Robertson et. al.(1986, 1990). Cone factors of Dutch cone and piezocone test empirically have been determined using laboratory and field vane test results. Using this cone factors, it was shown that there was good correlation between shear strength estimated using cone resistance and that of laboratory test and field vane tests. It was found that there was a good correlation between cone resistance from Dutch cone and that from piezocone. Relationship formula was also suggested. Dutch cone test provides a useful means for stratigraphic profiling in large project and has some advantage over piezocone in particular situations, such as very soft clay ground and dredged area.

• 한국지반공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국지반공학회 2002년도 가을 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.237-244
• /
• 2002

A comparative study of 134 mechanical (Dutch cone) and 9. electronic cone (Piezocone) penetration data from the southern part of Korea has been performed. In general, Dutch cone results may be different from piezocone results due to the difference in structure of the cones. Cone penetrometer test data were analyzed and plotted in soil classification chart proposed by Robertson et. al.(1986,1990) Cone factors of Dutch cone and piezocone test have empirically been determined using laboratory and field vane test results. Using this cone factors, it was shown that there was good correlation between shear strength estimated using cone resistance and that of laboratory test and field vane tests. It was found that there was a good correlation between cone resistance from Dutch cone and that from piezocone. Dutch cone test provides a useful means for stratigraphic profiling in large project and has some advantage over piezocone in particular situations, such as very soft clay ground and dredged area.

• 한국지반환경공학회 논문집
• /
• 제7권5호
• /
• pp.13-20
• /
• 2006

현장 지반조사시 널리 사용되고 있는 표준관입시험과 정적콘관입시험을 행하여 상관관계를 구하고 현장에서 채취한 시료를 실내시험을 행하여 현장관입시험과의 상관성에 관하여 비교 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 표준관입시험의 N값과 Dutch Cone Test의 $Q_c$의 관계는 유기질토 지반에서는 $Q_c=1.93N+0.29$, 점토지반은 $Q_c=2.19N+0.20$, 실트지반은 $Q_c=2.34N+1.06$으로 나타났고, 사질토층의 경우 실트질모래지반은 $Q_c=3.02N+0.54$, 모래지반은 $Q_c=3.47N+0.46$ 으로 나타났으며, 입자가 큰 토층일수록 $Q_c/N$값이 증가하였다. 표준관입시험의 N값과 일축압축강도 $q_u$의 관계는 유기질토는 $q_u=0.11N+0.03$, 점토는 $q_u=0.11N+0.25$, 실트는 $q_u=0.18N-0.03$으로 나타났다.