• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.25-37
• /
• 2018

민간투자자 사이에서의 리스크 재분담은 민간투자자의 현금흐름에 추가적인 변동성을 야기하며, 민간부문의 투자결정에 있어 제약요인이 되고 있다. 하지만 기존의 재정건전성 평가모델은 지분거래와 약정거래가 충분히 반영되지 않아, 민간투자자 간 리스크 재분담에 따른 현금흐름의 변동성을 분석하기에 한계가 있다. 본 연구는 민간투자자 사이에서 이루어지는 지분거래와 약정거래를 분석하고, 이를 반영한 민간투자자의 재무적 평가 모델을 개발하였다. 또한, 개발된 모델의 실증적 분석을 통해 지분거래의 주요변수와 약정거래의 영향요인을 도출하였으며, 민간투자자 간 리스크 재분담과 민간투자자의 수익률 간의 관계를 증명하였다. 본 연구는 리스크 재분담에 대한 민간투자자의 의사결정에 기여할 것이며, 더 나아가 민간투자사업의 협약지연의 문제를 관리하는데 도움이 될 것이다.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.285-293
• /
• 1999

This paper analyzes the facility investment appraisal process of a real world shipyard and proposes several improving points. For this purpose the investment appraisal sheets are investigated in terms of the theory of the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. Through this investigation, the differences between the theory and its application are clarified and it is tried to resolve the gab by applying the DCF method appropriately including explicit use of actual cash flows in revenue and expense expressions. It is also proposed that some portion of the capital loss caused by defending facility sales may not be the sunk cost and that the portion can conceptually be calculated by the difference between economic value and sales price.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제25권5호
• /
• pp.9-14
• /
• 2002

A capital investment problem is essentially one of determining whether the anticipated cash inflows from a proposed project are sufficiently attractive to invest funds in the project. The net present value(NPV) criterion and internal rate of return(IRR) criterion are widely used as means of making investment decisions. A positive NPV means the equivalent worth of the inflows is greater than the equivalent worth of outflows, so, the project makes profit. Business people are familiar with rates of return because they all borrow money to finance ventures, even if the money they borrow is their own. Thus they are apt to use the IRR in preference to the NPV. The IRR can be defined as the discount rate that causes the net present value of a cash flow to equal zero. Why the project are accepted if the project's IRR is greater than the investor's minimum attractive rate of return\ulcorner Against the NPV, the definition cannot distinctly explain the concept of the IRR as decision criterion. We present a new definition of the IRR as the ratio of profit on the invested capital.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제12권19호
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 1989

This paper concerns with the decision maker has the job of forecasting capital investments and operating expenses to aid the decision making in choosing and evaluating present annual and future alternatives. The cost estimating function eventually analysis, evaluates and choose the alternatives. And also, the marginal analysis performed originally from a preliminary design of some sort, and eventually plans are made to investigate investment possibilities. This paper provide the discounted net cash flows and the present, annual and future worth methods. In despite of any choice for an analytical methods, there remains the problems of predicting and assessments certain future events. Therefore, these models dealing with the optimal plant sizing, equipments replacement, and lease or buy will be discussed.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2009

In this paper, we develop theoretical game models to determine the level of government subsidies for banks to provide policy loans to Innovative SMEs(small and medium sized enterprises) through banks, which otherwise would not finance them for the sake of their own profitability. For this, we compare net cash flows of each bank using different strategies against high risk innovative SMEs. A bank can decide whether to provide them loans or not In each period. Following Kim(2003)'s Infinite horizon model on the soft budget constraint, we introduce a situation in which banks compete against each other for higher net long-term payoffs from their loans to innovative SMEs and non-innovative SMEs. From the models, we show that competition among banks in general leads to a tighter decision against innovative SMEs, as a Nash equilibrium. It is not because the government bank is simply loose in providing loans, but because competition among commercial banks for fewer riskier borrowers results in tighter loan decisions against innovative SMEs. Thus, the competitive market for policy loans to innovative SMEs fails to reach the socially optimal level of loans for innovative SMMs. Commercial banks in the competitive market may require additional supports from the government to make up for the differences in their payoffs to support innovative SMEs, possibly much riskier due to moral hazards and poor discounted cash flows. The monopolistic government bank might also request such supports from the government to fund otherwise unqualified SMEs. We calculate an optimal level of governmental support for banks to guarantee funding such high-risk innovative SMEs over periods without deviating from their optimal Nash equilibrium policies.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.1-17
• /
• 2021

민간투자사업은 30~40년이라는 긴 기간동안 수익이 발생하는 특성을 가지며 시간이 흐름에 따라 수익과 비용에 변동요인이 발생하여 통계모형이나 현금흐름할인법보다는 시간 흐름에 따른 변수들의 상호작용에 대한 시뮬레이션이 가능한 시스템 다이내믹스 기법을 이용한다면 내외부 변수들에 대해 유의미한 시뮬레이션 결과를 도출해 낼 수 있을 것으로 판단된다. 즉, 이전에 시도된 적 없는 항만분야 민간투자사업에 시스템다이내믹스를 기반으로 한 재무적 타당성 비교·검증 모형 수립을 통해 기존 현금흐름할인법과의 차이를 비교해보고, 거시경제요인, 운영기간, 사회적 할인율 등 각 변수들의 상호관계 작용이 재무성에 변화에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 시뮬레이션해 봄으로써 기존에 시도해 보지 않은 차별화된 연구를 수행해 보고자 한다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.137-142
• /
• 2019

There are two methods for evaluating two or more mutually exclusive projects. One is a total investment approach and the other is an incremental investment approach. The former can rank projects by the criterion of the net present value, but the latter can't do it. An incremental investment approach is only possible when all pairwise alternatives are compared. Thus an incremental investment approach is superior in ranking them over an incremental investment approach. To do so, a principle of comparison must be established. Comparisons of profitability are reasonable when operating the same amount of investment over the same period of time. One principle is that all projects are invested in the largest of the projects. Another principle is that all projects are invested during the longest project life of the projects. In this paper, even if the principle is followed, it will be shown that the external rate of return fails to rank them. However, the productive rate of return criterion would prove to be able to rank them like the net present value standard, provided that the principle of comparison is kept. In addition, rate of returns can be assessed so that all mutually exclusive projects can be compared at once, such as on the criterion of the net present value. That is, it can be also compared with many other returns, such as the profit rates on financial investments or real investments.