• 제목/요약/키워드: Directors' Ownership

검색결과 42건 처리시간 0.015초

벤처캐피탈 투자가 신규상장기업의 투명성 제고에 미치는 영향 (Venture Capital and Corporate Transparency in the Newly Public Firms)

  • 조성숙;이희우
    • 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
    • /
    • 제12권9호
    • /
    • pp.280-292
    • /
    • 2012
  • 벤처캐피탈은 기술기반 초기기업에 투자하여 이사회를 통해 직간접적으로 그 기업의 경영에 참여하고 그 기업의 투명성 제고에 일조해왔다. 실제로 2004년부터 2010년까지 국내에서 신규 상장된 기업에서도 벤처캐피탈의 투자가 투자기업의 투명성 제고에 미치는 영향이 어떤지 알아보기 위해 회귀분석을 실시하여 본 결과 첫째, 자산규모가 크고 부채비율이 높을수록 기업 투명성은 저하되었다. 둘째, 우량한 기업지배구조의한 지표가 되는 지배소유지분괴리 정도가 작을수록 기업 투명성은 제고되었다. 셋째, 설립부터 기업공개까지 소요기간이 짧을수록, PBR이 높은 고성장 기업일수록 투명성은 저하되었다. 다만, 벤처캐피탈의 투자가 직접적으로 기업 투명성 제고에 역할을 하는 지 확인할 수 없었으나, 기업공개까지 소요기간이 짧을수록 기업 투명성이 저하되는 결과가 나옴으로써 벤처캐피탈의 투자가 기업 투명성에 부정적인 역할을 하는 가능성을 배제할 수 없다. 더욱이, 기업 투명성이 낮은 기업이 더 많은 벤처캐피탈의 투자를 받았고, 벤처캐피탈이 주로 투자하는 PBR이 높은 고성장 기업일수록 기업 투명성이 저하되는 결과가 나와 이런 주장은 더욱 설득력이 있을 것으로 보인다.

기부금 지출과 기업 가치: 기업지배구조를 중심으로 (Donation Expenses and Corporate Value: A Focus on the Corporate Governance Structure)

  • 김수정;강신애
    • 유통과학연구
    • /
    • 제12권8호
    • /
    • pp.113-121
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose - Recently, the number of corporations that practice environmental and social responsibility, besides engaging in traditional profit-seeking activities, has been growing steadily, as interest in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is increasing. Recent research on CSR practices has identified the relationship between CSR activities and corporate value as one of the main issues in this respect. Considering that donations constitute a large proportion of a company's charitable activities, we considered the extent of donation expenses as a charitable activity in order to mitigate sample selection bias. Specifically, we analyzed the impact of donation expenses on firm value, while investigating if this impact varied in response to the level of corporate governance of firms. Research design, data, and methodology - We used non-financial firms listed on the Korean Stock Exchange, having their fiscal year end in December, and the sample period was 2006-2013. For the dependent variable, Tobin's q was used as the corporate value, and for the independent variable, donations were measured as the donation-expense-to-sales ratio. Corporate governance scores, as rated by the Korea Corporate Governance Service, were used to measure corporate governance levels because they consider the overall aspects of governance, including ownership structure, the board of directors, and the audit mechanism of individual companies. To examine the impact of donations on a company in relation to the level of corporate governance, we estimated regression models using the interaction terms of the governance dummy and donation variables. Then, we further estimated the regression models of two sub-samples that were classified according to the level of corporate governance. Similar to previous studies, the study uses variables that affect firm value, such as R&D expenditure, advertising expenses, EBITDA, debt-to-equity ratio, sales growth, company age, and company size as control variables. Results - The empirical results show that firm value significantly increased in response to an increase in donation expenses. Upon including the interaction terms of governance level dummy variables and donations, the coefficients of the interaction terms show significant positive values, while those of donation variables show significant negative values. In the strong governance sub-sample, the relationship between the donation expenses and corporate value was statistically positive (+) and significant. However, in the weak governance sub-sample, the relationship between the donation expenses and corporate value was statistically insignificant and negative (-). Conclusions - The empirical results suggest that donation expenses are significantly linked to an enhanced corporate value if firms have a good corporate governance structure. However, if the corporate governance structure is weak, the same relationship is not necessarily observed. The results of this study show that if a firm has high corporate governance, CSR practices enhance the company's reputation such that it has a positive (+) relationship with corporate value. If a firm has weak corporate governance, on the other hand, CSR practices are recognized as an agency cost and do not increase corporate value.