• Title/Summary/Keyword: Digital gangrene

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.014 seconds

Symmetrical Digital Gangrene Resulting from Vasopressor Usage for the Treatment of Septic Shock: Case Reports (패혈성 쇼크의 치료를 위한 승압제 사용 후 발생한 양측 사지 괴사: 증례 보고)

  • Song, Jae Hwang;Heo, Youn Moo;Oh, Byung Hak;Cha, Hyun Jae
    • Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society
    • /
    • v.23 no.4
    • /
    • pp.196-200
    • /
    • 2019
  • Symmetrical Digital Gangrene (SDG) is characterized by the sudden onset of peripheral, symmetrical gangrene in the absence of any major vascular occlusive disease. Catecholamine inotropes are frequently used for the treatment of septic shock combined with an unstable hemodynamic state, and their usage can rarely induce SDG. There is no standard treatment for the SDG. Early recognition and prompt management of sepsis and expeditious process of weaning off of the inotropes are necessary to prevent progression of SDG. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in Korea regarding the treatment of SDG induced by catecholamine inotropes.

Usefulness of Awake Anesthesia in Flexor Tendon Surgery (굴곡건 수술에서 각성마취의 유용성)

  • Shim, Byung-Kwan;Jung, Sung-Gyun;Choi, Hwan-Jun;Park, Eun-Soo;Tark, Min-Seong
    • Archives of Plastic Surgery
    • /
    • v.37 no.6
    • /
    • pp.795-800
    • /
    • 2010
  • Purpose: According to various medical publications, it is believed that epinephrine should not be injected in fingers. However numerous articles show the successful use of local anesthetic with epinephrine in the digits. Epinephrine-mixed lidocaine solution enables to maintain a bloodless field for operation and provides long duration of local anesthesia when patient was wide awake. Methods: From May 2009 to December 2009, ten patients underwent flexor tendon reconstruction with local anesthesia using epinephrine. No tourniquet was necessary. Before operation, all patients were injected with local anesthetics using 1% lidocaine 20 mL and 0.1% epinephrine 0.1 mL. Results: There was no case of digital necrosis nor gangrene in the epinephrine injection. All 10 patients actively could move the finger through a full range of motion. All procedures were performed without sedation nor tourniquet and we could obtain a good vision of operative field and patients were comfortable. The patient make his or her fingers move through a full range of active motion before the skin is closed. Phentolamine was not required to reverse the vasoconstriction in any patients. Conclusion: The assertation that epinephrine should not be injected into the fingers is clearly no longer valid. The epinephrine injection allowed the authors to adjust flexor tendon surgery without risks associated with general anesthesia. It also enables to ensure longer anesthetic duration and bloodless operative field, and prevent post operative complications. In case of flexor tendon surgery, the use of epinephrine injection is recommended because of the advantages of local anesthesia.