• Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.238-244
• /
• 2003

With the purpose of evaluating the effect of ailing amount of pit and assure sealants on the microleakage, 6 groups of specimens with different filling amount, filling materials and surface pretreatment were investigated. Sixty permanent third molars were divided into three groups. The occlusal surface of each tooth was divided into two parts; the filing width of one part was below 1mm (group1, 3, 5), and in the other part more than 2mm (group 2, 4, 6) Group 1 and 2: Helioseal F was applied directly to etched enamel; Group 3 and 4: Helioseal F was applied to etched and scotchbond Multi-purpose plus pre-treated enamel; Group 5 and 6: Tetric Flow was applied. After 500 times thermocycling and dye infiltration, we evaulated the microleakage. The results were as follows; 1. The mean microleakage score at each width were increased in the following order;group 5<3<1, and group 6<4<2. 2. In comparing the groups with same material and surface pretreatment but with different filling width (group 1 versus 2, 3 versus 4, 5 versus 6), the microleakage scores were significantly different. 3 The microleage was affected by filling amount of pit and assure sealants than Oiling materials and dentin bonding agent pretreatment.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.164-172
• /
• 2010

During a composite resin restoration, an anticipating contraction gap is usually tried to seal with low-viscosity resin after successive polishing, etching, rinsing and drying steps, which as a whole is called rebonding procedure. However, the gap might already have been filled with water or debris before applying the sealing resin. We hypothesized that microleakage would decrease if the rebonding agent was applied before the polishing step, i.e., immediately after curing composite resin. On the buccal and lingual surfaces of 35 extracted human molar teeth, class V cavities were prepared with the occlusal margin in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. They were restored with a hybrid composite resin Z250 (3M ESPE, USA) using an adhesive AdperTM Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE). As rebonding agents, BisCover LV (Bisco, USA), ScotchBond Multi-Purpose adhesive (3M ESPE) and an experimental adhesive were applied on the restoration margins before polishing step or after successive polishing and etching steps. The infiltration depth of 2% methylene blue into the margin was measured using an optical stereomicroscope. The correlation between viscosity of rebonding agents and mciroleakage was also evaluated. There were no statistically significant differences in the microleakage within the rebonding procedures, within the rebonding agents, and within the margins. However, when the restorations were not rebonded, the microleakage at gingival margin was significantly higher than those groups rebonded with 3 agents (p < 0.05). The difference was not observed at the occlusal margin. No significant correlation was found between viscosity of rebonding agents and microleakage, except very weak correlation in case of rebonding after polishing and etching at gingival margin.