• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제47권3호
• /
• pp.479-496
• /
• 2019

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to develop defense quality evaluation model in order to improve the problem of private sector quality evaluation model and propose the total integrated defense quality management model which enables to evaluate not only large defense industry, but also small-medium industry. Methods: This paper consider the characteristics on ISO 9001 Quality Management System, single PPM, PASS and defense quality and develop defense quality maturity model and index which enables to measure the current quality management level and characteristics and to evaluate operational characteristics in each maturity level for domestic defense industry. Results: From 176 DQMS certified defense industry, the defense quality maturity level is 68,2, C grade. The large defense industry shows, 80.9, A grade; medium industry 69.7, C grade; small-medium industry shows 54.1, D grade. Through the classified types of industries, the current level of quality management of defense industries was diagnosed and the areas to be supplemented for the total quality management were identified. Conclusion: Developed DQMI can be used as the basic information for spreading quality management activities in the defense industry by diagnosing the overall quality management of existing defense industries and quantifying the ambiguity of non-metric measurements and measurement standard that were presented as the threshold of the defense quality management system certification process.

• 안보군사학연구
• /
• 통권5호
• /
• pp.241-280
• /
• 2007

This study examines the relationship of the industry-specific factors that effect innovation of manufacturing technology and the market share within the defense industry. Since the establishment of the basic defense industry framework in 1973, there were numerous interactions of the industry-specific factors of the defense industry structure with the technological innovation and market organization of the defense industry. During last three decades, the domestic defense industry has achieved the considerable level but the framework of the basic system has not developed much in areas of the military science and the defense manufacturing technology. Industry-specific factors were formed in the process and appeared in a variety of behavioral characteristics as subsystems. Currently, there IS a growing trend where the management of defense industry is gradually deteriorating due to limitation of the domestic industry-specific factor (e.g. defense technologies, amount of demand, etc.). If there is a prominent imbalance of the industry-specific factors. it can trigger the potential problem of conflict, lack of cooperation and control, slowing the growth of the manufacturing technology thereby diminishing the market and deteriorating the defense supply/demand relationship. In a research conducted by Joe S. Bain, Bain analyzed the relationship of the traditional industrial organization where industry-specific factor(S) not only impacts the conductor(C). And, conductor(C) influences the shaping of the performance(P) of relationship of the traditional industrial organization. Consequently, the researcher has identified the demand monopoly, barriers to entry, and market competition with comparison of defense industry issues. These defense issues were three industry-specific factors identified, which are 1) The demand monopoly and The entry barriers to new market competition, 2) the industrial technical factor to a production technical competitiveness and a market sharing competitiveness, 3) the probability factor to revolution for military affairs(RMA) and a R&D production. According to baseline with these factors, the following research model is established from the special companies group(Group A), the systematization companies group(Group B), and the general companies group(Group 0. The hypothesis is that if there are more industry-specific factors, then there will be more relationships of defense industry relation statutes. This research is an empirical study on the relationship that the industry specific factors effects the innovation of manufacturing technology and the shaping of the market in the defense industry. Moreover, the existing models to evaluate the industry specific factors of the defense industry IS much to be desired with the controlled statistical analysis of the result. It is vital to study on current situation with suggesting alternative strategy to the efficient strategy. The descriptive analysis approach analysis is conducted with SPSSWIN to conduct reliability test, factor analysis, correlation analysis, cross-tabulation analysis, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression analysis. However, there were some limitations of the survey such as the rigidity of concept about the technical factors and various market management factors. The wishes is that the decision-maker could be utilized these defence industrial factors to formulate efficient defence policy and strategy in the future.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.492-500
• /
• 2014

The defense industry export of Korea has been steadily risen since 2006. It is attained $340million, the highest export amounts ever, in 2013. As the defense industry export increase, Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) built defense industry export and import management system to assist export and to protect defense technologies. In this paper, we study factors to activate the defense industry export and import management system using Technology Acceptance Model(TAM) in compulsive usage environment. The significance of this study is as follows: First, we prove the reliability and feasibility of measurement variables in defense industry of compulsive usage environment. Second, we suggest factors to activate the defense industry export and import management system. Third, we present methodology to find factors in computation systems of public institute using TAM.

• 국방과기술
• /
• 7호통권113호
• /
• pp.74-77
• /
• 1988

• 국방과기술
• /
• 3호통권145호
• /
• pp.74-75
• /
• 1991

• 국방과기술
• /
• 10호통권200호
• /
• pp.16-17
• /
• 1995

• 국방과기술
• /
• 11호통권117호
• /
• pp.60-61
• /
• 1988

• 국방과기술
• /
• 10호통권212호
• /
• pp.66-67
• /
• 1996

• 국방과기술
• /
• 12호통권226호
• /
• pp.22-23
• /
• 1997

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제21권8호
• /
• pp.130-139
• /
• 2020

방위산업은 국가 안보 유지를 위한 기간산업이자 첨단기술이 집약된 미래지향 산업으로써, 방위산업의 연구개발은 무척 중요하다. 우리 정부의 자주국방에 기반을 둔 과감한 정책으로, 국내 방위산업은 양적, 질적으로 많은 성장을 이루었다. 하지만 전문화 및 계열화 제도의 폐지에 따른 경쟁체제의 도입은 국내 방위산업체의 효율성 및 생산성 향상의 필요성이 대두되는 계기가 되었다. 본 연구에서는 DEA와 Super-SBM을 이용하여 국내 방위산업체의 연구개발 효율성을 측정하고자 한다. 이를 위해 한국방위산업진흥회의 '2019 방산업체 경영분석' 데이터를 활용하였으며, 국내 방위산업체의 연구원수 및 투자액을 투입변수로, 매출액을 산출변수로 설정하여 분석을 수행하였다. 방위산업체의 효율성을 분석하기 위해 규모수익불변(CRS)을 가정하는 CCR 모형과 규모수익가변(VRS)을 가정한 BCC 모형을 활용하였으며, 효율적인 업체들 간의 순위를 확인하기 위해 Super-SBM 모형을 사용하여 초효율성을 도출하였으며, 국내 방위산업체는 대체로 비효율적인 모습을 보였다. 본 연구를 통한 국내 방위산업체의 연구개발 효율성을 파악하여 향후 국내 방위산업체의 육성 정책 수립에 도움이 되기를 기대한다.