• Title/Summary/Keyword: Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

Search Result 2, Processing Time 0.07 seconds

DARPA's Hypersonic Vehicle and TBCC Engine Programs (DARPA의 극초음속 항공기 및 TBCC 엔진 프로그램)

  • Noh, Jin-Hyeon;Choi, Jeong-Yeol;Byun, Jong-Ryul;Gil, Hyun-Yong;Yoon, Hyun-Gull;Lim, Jin-Shik
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Propulsion Engineers
    • /
    • v.14 no.1
    • /
    • pp.65-78
    • /
    • 2010
  • DARPA carries out several R&D programs for hypersonic vehicles to maintain the U.S. military superiority in air and space. Falcon program is the core of the DARPA's activitiy for the hypersonics including the long-term step-by-step approach from HTV-1, HTV-2, HTV-3X to HCV. Hypersonic Turbo-Based Combined Cycle (TBCC) engine technologies research and development programs, HiSTED, FaCET and Vulcan, are also the parts of their activities. Present article presents the summarized review on the backgrounds, technologies and relationships of those programs.

Mutual Recognition of National Military Airworthiness Authorities: A Streamlined Assessment Process

  • Purton, Leon;Kourousis, Kyriakos I.;Clothier, Reece;Massey, Kevin
    • International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.54-62
    • /
    • 2014
  • The Air and Space Interoperability Council (ASIC) has adopted the European Defence Agency (EDA) process for inter-regulatory military airworthiness authority recognition. However, there are gaps in the application of this process to nations outside of the European Union. This paper proposes a model that can effectively map diverse technical airworthiness regulatory frameworks. This model, referred to as the Product-Behaviour-Process (PBP) Bow-Tie model, provides the systematic structure needed to represent and compare regulatory frameworks. The PBP Bow-Tie model identifies key points of difference that need to be addressed, during inter-agency recognition between the two regulatory authorities. With the intention to adopt global use of the EDA process, the proposed PBP Bow-Tie model can be used as a basis for the successful recognition of regulatory frameworks outside of the European Union. Iris plots produced from the implementation of this model are presented, and proposed as a suitable means of illustrating the outcome of an assessment, and of supporting the comparisons of results. A comparative analysis of the Australian Defence Force and New Zealand Defence Force airworthiness regulatory frameworks is used as a case study. The case study clearly illustrates the effectiveness of the model in discerning regulatory framework differences; moreover, it has offered an opportunity to explore the limitations of the Iris plot.