• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제20권6호
• /
• pp.515-525
• /
• 2020

최근 공동주택에서 발생하는 하자로 인한 소송 및 분쟁이 증가하고 있어 사회적 이슈로 대두되고 있다. 이를 해결하기 위해 많은 공동주택 하자 유형에 관한 연구들이 진행되었지만, 문제가 원만하게 해결되지 않고 있다. 최근 시공된 공동주택을 대상으로 공종별 하자 유형을 조사해 추후 하자 대책 및 예방방안을 제시하는 연구의 기반을 마련할 필요성이 강조되었다. 이에 본 연구는 프로젝트관리시스템와 하자보고서를 통해 공동주택에서 발생한 실제 하자 사례를 바탕으로 하자를 분석하였으며, 주요 목적은 공동주택의 세부공종별 하자 유형을 파악함으로써 주요 하자 유형에 대한 원인을 제시하고, 추후 하자 유형별 대책 및 예방방안 연구의 기반을 마련함에 있다.

• 한국건설관리학회논문집
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.74-82
• /
• 2014

도시인구의 급격한 증가와 경제 성장으로 주택보급 문제를 원활히 해결하기 위한 정부의 주택보급정책으로 공동주택의 비중이 지속적으로 증가하였다. 이러한 보급률 제고와 함께 공동주택의 품질에 대한 관심이 높아짐에 따라 건설업체들은 소비자의 삶의 질 향상이나 타 업체의 치열한 경쟁에 맞추어 소비자의 만족도를 향상시키기 위한 노력을 지속적으로 수행하였다. 그러나 이러한 노력에도 불구하고 수요자의 기대수준과 공급된 공동주택의 품질의 차이로 인한 갈등이 심화되고 있으며 건설사들의 하자에 대한 소극적인 대처와 사전대응 전략의 미흡으로 하자관련 분쟁과 소송이 증가하고 있다. 이러한 건설사의 고객만족팀과 법무팀의 사후대처적, 소극적 대응은 이러한 건설관련 소송의 증가를 부추기고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 실제 하자소송 판례를 중심으로 하자목록의 유형분석과 금액분석을 통하여 관리 우선순위를 도출하여 하자발생 이전에 대응 전략 수립이 가능한 하자기획소송 사전 대응모델을 개발하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 대응 모델은 하자소송이 발생 한 이후의 대응이 아닌 프로젝트 초기단계부터의 대응 모델로서 하자소송의 위험성을 사전에 인지하고 이에 대한 관리전략의 수립에 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.187-210
• /
• 2019

This article examines the necessity for the introduction of an ICSID Appellate System. In comparison with the WTO appellate system, the ICSID ad hoc Committee has a very limited mandate. An annulment inquiry under the ICSID arbitration system barely focuses on whether the arbitral decision resulted from a justifiable process. As long as there is procedural legitimacy, the resulting awards remain unaffected under the annulment procedure, irrespective of mistakes of fact or law. In contrast, in the WTO DSS the AB substantively reviews panel rulings and suggestions that are founded on any deficiency of objectivity or error in the interpretation of a particular WTO provision. This defect intrinsic in the annulment procedure could cause injustice to a party earnestly interested in correcting recognized misapplication of law by ICSID tribunals. Accordingly, the establishment of an appellate system would result in a more substantive and procedural review of awards. The creation of such an ICSID appellate system would ensure thorough scrutiny of the decisions of the tribunal of first instance, leading to better reasoned outcomes. This could lead to a crystallization of predictability in investment relations. The end result would be that fairness, clarity, reliability, and legality in the ICSID adjudicative process would be unassailable, to the advantage of all the contracting parties.

• 전기학회논문지
• /
• 제60권6호
• /
• pp.1274-1279
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this paper is to present the manufacturing defect and damage pattern of a 3 phase 22.9/3.3kV oil immersed transformer, as well as to present an objective basis for the prevention of a similar accident and to secure data for the settlement of PL related disputes. It was found that in order to prevent the occurrence of accidents to transformers, insulating oil analysis, thermal image measurement, and corona discharge diagnosis, etc., were performed by establishing relevant regulation. The result of analysis performed on the external appearance of a transformer to which an accident occurred, the internal insulation resistance and protection system, etc., showed that most of the analysis items were judged to be acceptable. However, it was found that the insulation characteristics between the primary winding and the enclosure, those between the ground and the secondary winding, and those between the primary and secondary windings were inappropriate due to an insulating oil leak caused by damage to the pressure relief valve. From the analysis of the acidity values measured over the past 5 years, it is thought that an increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) caused an increase in the temperature inside the transformer and the increase in the ethylene gas increased the possibility of ignition. Even though 17 years have passed since the transformer was installed, it was found that the system's design, manufacture, maintenance and management have been performed well and the insulating paper was in good condition, and that there was no trace of public access or vandalism. However, in the case of transformers to which accidents have occurred, a melted area between the upper and the intermediate bobbins of the W-phase secondary winding as well as between its intermediate and lower bobbins. It can be seen that a V-pattern was formed at the carbonized area of the transformer and that the depth of the carbonization is deeper at the upper side than the lower side. In addition, it was found that physical bending and deformation occurred inside the secondary winding due to non-uniform pressure while performing transformer winding work. Therefore, since it is obvious that the accident occurred due to a manufacturing defect (winding work defect), it is thought that the manufacturer of the transformer is responsible for the accident and that it is lawful for the manufacture to investigate and prove the concrete cause of the accident according to the Product Liability Law (PLL).

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제53권2호
• /
• pp.82-95
• /
• 2015

Background: Interest in medical malpractice claims and accidents is a day-to-day social issue to general public as well as medical personnel. Related laws and regulations already have been established, and institutions based on the laws and regulations also have been founded. However, in our dental community, interest and response to the issue seem insufficient. Methods: We searched four medical literature databases that are mainly cited in the medical community. Keywords including 'dental malpractice claims', 'patient safety' and 'medical accident' were used for the search. Among the selected literatures, we chose specific ones separately whose content is authentic and easily approachable. Results: Medical malpractice claims and accidents tend to increase around the world. As the cost or the difficulty level of surgery increases, the dispute rate also increases, which appears even more apparent in developed countries. Preventive measures to prevent the disputes and accidents are not significantly different. Three critical of them include relationship of doctor with patient, the informed consent and medical record. Conclusion: Tools for accident occurrence or communication improvement have been introduced. All of those cost time and money. However, education or professional request of liability insurance companies, self-education and provision of guidelines can be immediately implemented. To implement those, dentists' promotion at the regional or national level is imperative. rhBMP-2 is widely used at sinus augmentation, alveolar bone defect, and socket preservation.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.81-91
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 조경공사 하자판례를 조사하여 하자소송의 일반적 분석, 공종별 판결 결과, 하자유형별 판결결과를 분석하고 하자분쟁을 완화하기 위한 조경공사 하자처리 개선방안을 제안하는 것이다. 본 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 2000년대 들어 조경공사와 관련된 하자소송이 증가하고 있으며, 소송 기간은 1심의 경우 603일, 2심의 경우는 550일로 나타나 사용자와 시공자 모두에게 심각한 시간적 경제적 손실을 초래하고 있다. 2. 감정금액 대비 인용금액이 1심의 경우 52.0%, 2심의 경우 57.3%, 전체적으로는 53.6% 수준으로 감정금액이 과다하게 책정되는 경향이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 3. 공종별 하자판결 결과는 조경수목식재가 전체 하자 발생 공종의 75%에 달하여 주요한 쟁점으로 나타났으며, 사용자인 원고의 승소율이 77%에 달하여 시공자들의 하자이행에 심각한 부담으로 나타났다. 4. 하자유형별 판결 결과에서는 사용자의 유지관리 부실로 인한 하자가 28%를 차지하고 시공자인 피고의 승소율이 64%로 높게 나타나 사용자의 유지관리 책임이 중요하게 부각되었다. 이러한 문제를 개선하기 위해서는 하자를 줄일 수 있도록 정확한 시공을 하고, 적절한 유지관리를 시행하도록 해야 하며, 부적기 식재 및 천재지변에 의한 피해 등 하자면책규정, 공종별 하자판정기준, 하자이행절차 등을 포함하는 조경공사 하자판정 및 처리기준을 마련해야 한다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제17권
• /
• pp.251-293
• /
• 2002

The study is a comparative and analytical study which comprises of the analysis of the rules of the buyer's right to withhold performance where the seller delivers defective goods or documents of three legal systems; the CISG, English law and Korean law. The purposes underlying this study are twofold. The first is to clarify the current position as to the right of withholding performance in the event of the seller's tender of defective goods or documents in Korean law, CISG and English law so that it may assist the parties in drafting the buyer's right to withhold performance in their own contract. The second is to compare the rules of one jurisdiction with those of other jurisdictions and to evaluate the rules in light of the practical functions and benefits of the right to withhold performance and the discipline of comparative law the basic question of which is whether a solution from one jurisdiction may facilitate the systematic development and reform of another jurisdiction. It shows that each jurisdiction does not have any provision or case law specifically dealing with the buyer's right to withhold performance where the seller delivers the goods which are defective in terms of quality or quantity. The absence of such provision or case in each jurisdiction has resulted in either disputes or uncertainty. However, the study executed in light of the primary functions and benefits of the right in practice and the discipline of comparative law reveals that, first, the view in English law which is against recognizing the right may not be justified when one considers the practical importance of having the right and the position taken by the CISG as a well developed and modernized law, second, the view in Korean law which argues that the principle of specific goods dogma on which it is based is extended even to substitutable or repairable goods cannot be also justified on the ground of one's ordinary expectation and the position under the CISG and English law which imposes a contractual duty to deliver non-defective goods on the seller insofar as the buyer's payment is deemed to be made in exchange for the seller's delivery of non-defective goods and they are substitutable or repairable. Regarding the right to withhold performance in the event of the seller's tender of defective documents, the study shows that the relatively detailed rules in English law may be utilized as a guideline to fill the gap in the CISG and Korean law in terms of the practicability and appropriateness to govern documentary sales. Furthermore, it is found that the position in English law which confers on the buyer the right to withhold performance for a trivial defect in documents may be unreasonable in terms of one's need to enable justice to be done in individual cases.