• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2022.05a
• /
• pp.252-254
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to show the works of Jeju artists and ways to contribute to the Jeju tourism industry, with the research background in that it has recently continued to accept the works of Jeju contemporary artists and draws active works. As a measure to achieve this research purpose, the Deep Dream Generator software was judged to be an effective method for promoting this study. As a specific research process, we will use the Deep Dream Generator to synthesize each of the works of Jeju artists and works of famous foreign artists provided by Deep Dream Generators with their own photos of Jeju Oreum and display the results, and attempt to reinterpret Jeju Oreum using artificial intelligence. In addition, it is expected to revitalize Jeju's art works and tourism by seeking ways to use the results in Jeju tourism products.

• Trans-
• /
• v.13
• /
• pp.117-140
• /
• 2022

Recently, artificial intelligence technology is being used throughout the industry. Currently, Currently, AI art generators are used in the NFT industry, and works using them have been exhibited and sold. AI art generators in the art field include Gated Photos, Google Deep Dream, Sketch-RNN, and Auto Draw. AI art generators in the music field are Beat Blender, Google Doodle Bach, AIVA, Duet, and Neural Synth. The characteristics of AI art generators are as follows. First, AI art generator in the art field are being used to create new works based on existing work data. Second, it is possible to quickly and quickly derive creative results to provide ideas to creators, or to implement various creative materials. In the future, AI art generators are expected to have a great influence on content planning and production such as visual art, music composition, literature, and movie.

• Science of Emotion and Sensibility
• /
• v.25 no.3
• /
• pp.107-116
• /
• 2022

Purpose: Researchers have shown that aesthetic judgments of artworks depend on contexts, such as the authenticity of an artwork (Newman & Bloom, 2011) and an artwork's location of display (Kirk et al., 2009; Silveira et al., 2015). The present study aims to examine whether contextual information related to the creator, such as whether an artwork was created by a human or artificial intelligence (AI), influences viewers' preference judgments of an artwork. Methods: Images of Impressionist landscape paintings were selected as human-made artworks. AI-made artwork stimuli were created using Google's Deep Dream Generator by mimicking the Impressionist style via deep learning algorithms. Participants performed a preference rating task on each of the 108 artwork stimuli accompanied by one of the two creator labels. After this task, an art experience questionnaire (AEQ) was given to participants to examine whether individual differences in art experience influence their preference judgments. Results: Setting AEQ scores as a covariate in a two-way ANCOVA analysis, the stimuli with the human-made context were preferred over the stimuli with the AI-made context. Regarding the types of stimuli, the viewers preferred AI-made stimuli to human-made stimuli. There was no interaction effect between the two factors. Conclusion: These results suggest that preferences for visual artworks are influenced by the contextual information of the creator when the individual differences in art experience are controlled.