최근 코로나19, 환경오염 등으로 비대면 환경이 전개되면서 온라인 디지털 헬스케어의 중요성이 커지고 있으며 관련하여 건강관리, 원격진료, 디지털 치료제 등의 벤처창업 및 활동도 활발히 진행되고 있다. 본 연구는 디지털 헬스케어 스마트워치 수용성에 미치는 영향을 확장된 통합기술수용모형(UTAUT2)과 행동추론모형(BRT)의 통합적 접근으로 진행하였다. 첨단 ICT와 의료가 융합된 디지털 헬스케어에 적합한 요인 발굴은 혁신기술 수용연구에 가장 진보적으로 평가받는 확장된 통합기술수용모형을 활용하여 효용기대, 사회영향, 사용편의, 가격장벽, 대안부족, 이용장벽 등의 주요 요인을 도출하였고, 소비자의 가치-이유-태도-행동의도를 일괄 검증 할 수 있으면서 수용이유뿐만 아니라 비수용이유-소비자 스마트워치 디지털 헬스케어 인식의 긍정적 측면뿐만 아니라 부정적 측면까지-분석 할 수 있는 행동추론모형을 활용하여 인과관계 영향과 크기를 검증하였다. 연구를 위해 전국에 있는 10대에서 60대에 이르는 일반인을 대상으로 약 410여건의 설문 응답을 취합하여 이를 바탕으로 데이터에 대한 신뢰성 및 타당성 검정을 거쳐 구조방정식을 이용하여 가설을 검증하였다. 연구 분석에는 SPSS 23, AMOS 23 등을 활용하였다. 연구 결과, 개인혁신성은 수용이유(효용가치, 사회영향, 사용편의), 태도, 비수용이유(가격장벽, 대안부족, 이용장벽)에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 혁신된 ICT의 주요 가치의 사용자 수용의도에의 영항을 확인한 선행연구 연구결과와 동일하다. 그리고 수용이유는 태도에 유의미한 영향을 미치나 비수용이유의 영향은 유의하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 소비자들이 ICT 신제품·신규서비스에는 관심이 크지만 이의 구입은 보다 신중하게 선택적으로 한다고 보여 진다. 본 연구는 학술적으로는 기존의 소비자 범용 혁신기술 수용성 분석을 새롭고 향후 중요분야인 스마트워치 디지털 헬스케어 분야의 소비자 가치 수용성 분석으로 발전시켰으며 확장된 통합기술수용모형과 행동추론모형의 장점을 살려 통합적으로 실행한 점 등이 있겠으며, 산업적으로는 기존 소비자의 수용성 이유 분석 중심에서 소비자 수용·비수용 이유 통합 검증으로 스마트워치를 구매하는 이유뿐만 아니라 구매하지 않는 이유까지 분석하여 제품·서비스 기획, 개발, 마케팅에 기여 할 수 있게 했다는 점 등이 있겠다. 본 연구가 향후 우리 생활에 중요한 역할을 할 디지털 헬스케어 분야의 연구 증대에 기여 할 수 있기 바라며 또한 본 연구와 같은 통합적 접근 모형과 소비자 수용·비수용 이유 통합 분석 등을 통하여 혁신과 향후 관련 연구들이 좀 더 소비자 가치에 적합한 심도 있는 요인 발굴과 검증으로 발전하기를 기대한다.
The ability of any organization to innovate itself in a rapid change of environment means the existence of the organization. Innovative activity is achieved in different ways according to the objectives of organization. the characteristics of external environmental factors. and various attributes in organization. In the present study. all the existing approaches to the innovative nature of organization were synthetically compared to each other and evaluated: then. for a more rational approach. a research model was built and suggested by establishing the inclusive variables of the innovative nature of library organization and categorizing the types of such nature. Additionally. an empirical. analytical study on such a model was done. That is. paying regard to the fact that innovation has basically a close relation with the circumstantial factors of organization. synthetic, circumstantial relations were clarified. considering the external environmental factors and internal characteristics of organization. In the study. the innovation of library organization was seen in two parts i.e .. the feasible degree of technical innovation and the feasible degree of administrative innovation. Regarding the types of innovative implementation. according to the feasible degree of innovation, four types such as a stationary type. technic-oriented type, organization-oriented type. and technical-socio systematic type were classified. There were nine independent variables-i.e., the scale of organization. available resources of the organization, formalization, differentiation, specialization. decentralization, recognizant degree of the technical attribute. degree of response to the change of technical environment, and professional activities. There were three subordinate variables - i.e., technical innovation, administrative innovation. and the performance of organization. Through establishment of such variables, the factors which might influence the innovation of library organization were understood, and with the types of the innovative implementation of library organization being classified according to the feasible degree of innovation. the characteristics of library organization were reviewed in the light of each type. Also. the performance of library organization according to the types of the innovative implementation of library organization was analyzed. and the relations between the types of innovative implementation according to circumstantial variables and the performance of library organization were clarified. In order to clarify the adequacy of the research model in the methodology of empirical study, data were collected from 72 university libraries and 38 special libraries. and for a hypothetical test of the research model. an analysis of correlations, a stepwise regression analysis. and One Way ANOVA were utilized. The following are the major results or findings from the study 1) It appeared there is a trend that the bigger the scale of organization and available resources are, the more active the professional activity of the managerial class is, and the higher the recognizant degree of technical environment (recognizant degree of technical attributes and the degree of response t9 the change of technical environment) is, the higher the feasible degree of innovation becomes. 2) It appeared that among the variables influencing the feasible degree of technical innovation, the order from the variable influencing most was first, the recognizant degree of technical innovation: second, the available resources of organization: and third, professional activity. Regarding the variables influencing the feasible degree of administrative innovation from the most influential variable, it appeared they were the available resources of organization, the differentiation of organization. and the degree of response to the change of technical environment. 3) It appeared that the higher the educational level of the managerial class is, the more active the professional activity becomes. It seemed there is a trend that the group of library managers whose experience as a librarian was at the middle level(three years to six years of experience) was more active in research activity than the group of library managers whose experience as a librarian was at a higher level(more than ten years). Also, it appeared there is a trend that the lower the age of library managers is, the higher the recognizant degree of technical attributes becomes. and the group of library managers whose experience as a librarian was at the middle level (three years to six years of experience) recognized more affirmatively the technical aspect than the group of library managers whose experience as a librarian was at a higher level(more than 10 years). Also, it appeared that, when the activity of the professional association and research activity are active, the recognizant degree of technology becomes higher, and as a result. it influences the innovative nature of organization(the feasible degree of technical innovation and the feasible degree of administrative innovation). 4) As a result of the comparison and analysis of the characteristics of library organization according to the types of innovative implementation of library organization. it was indicated there is a trend that the larger the available resources of library organization, the higher the organic nature of organization such as differentiation. decentralization, etc., and the higher the level of the operation of system development, the more the type of the innovative implementation of library organization becomes the technical-socio systematic type which is higher both in the practical degrees of technical innovation and administrative innovation. 5) As a result of the comparison and analysis of the relations between the types of innovative implementation and the performance of organization, it appeared that the order from the highest performance of organization is the technical-socio systematic type, then the technic-oriented type, the organizationoriented type, and finally the stationary type which is lowest in such performance. That is, it demonstrated that, since the performance of library organization is highest in the library of the technical-socio systematic type while it is lowest in the library whose practical degrees in both technical innovation and administrative innovation are low, the performance of library organization differs significantly according to the types of innovative implementation of library organization. The present study has extracted the factors influencing innovation, classified systematically the types of innovative implementation, and inferred the synthetical, circumstantial correlations between the types and the performance of organization, and empirically inspected those factors. However, due to the present study's restrictive matters and the limit of the research design, results from the study should be more prudently interpreted. Also, the present study, as an investigative study of the types of innovative implementation, with few preceding studies, requires more complete hypothetical inference based on the results of the present study. In other words, if more systematical studies are given to understanding the relations, it will devote the suggestion and demonstration of a more useful theory.