• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제48권5호
• /
• pp.1109-1119
• /
• 2016

Although, the direct use of spent pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel in CANda Deuterium Uranium (CANDU) reactors (DUPIC) cycle is still under investigation, DUPIC cycle is a promising method for uranium utilization improvement, for reduction of high level nuclear waste, and for high degree of proliferation resistance. This paper focuses on the effect of DUPIC cycle on CANDU reactor safety parameters. MCNP6 was used for lattice cell simulation of a typical 3,411 MWth PWR fueled by $UO_2$ enriched to 4.5w/o U-235 to calculate the spent fuel inventories after a burnup of 51.7 MWd/kgU. The code was also used to simulate the lattice cell of CANDU-6 reactor fueled with spent fuel after its fabrication into the standard 37-element fuel bundle. It is assumed a 5-year cooling time between the spent fuel discharges from the PWR to the loading into the CANDU-6. The simulation was carried out to calculate the burnup and the effect of DUPIC fuel on: (1) the power distribution amongst the fuel elements of the bundle; (2) the coolant void reactivity; and (3) the reactor point-kinetics parameters.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.175-183
• /
• 2004

For the analysis of a dry process fuel cycle, new modules were implemented into the fuel cycle analysis code DYMOND, which was developed by the Argonne National Laboratory. The modifications were made to the energy demand prediction model, a Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactor, direct use of spent pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel in CANDU reactors (DUPIC) fuel cycle model, the fuel cycle calculation module, and the input/output modules. The performance of the modified DYMOND code was assessed for the postulated once-through fuel cycle models including both the PWR and CANDU reactor. This paper presents modifications of the DYMOND code and the results of sample calculations for the PWR once-though and DUPIC fuel cycles.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.359-374
• /
• 2006

Since 1991, Korea, Canada and United States have performed the direct use of spent pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel in the Canada deuterium uranium (CANDU) reactors (DUPIC) fuel development project. Unlike the Tandem fuel cycle, which requires a wet reprocessing, the DUPIC fuel technology can directly refabricate CANDU fuels from the PWR spent fuel and, therefore, is recognized as a highly proliferation-resistant fuel cycle technology, which can be adopted even in non-proliferation treaty countries. The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) has fabricated DUPIC fuel elements in a laboratory-scale remote fuel fabrication facility. KAERI has demonstrated the fuel performance in the research reactor, and has confirmed the operational feasibility and safety of a CANDU reactor loaded with the DUPIC fuel using conventional design and analysis tools, which will be the foundation of the future practical and commercial uses of DUPIC fuel.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.85-94
• /
• 2007

The Korean nuclear fuel cycle was modeled by the dynamic analysis method, which was applied to the once-through and alternative fuel cycles. First, the once-through fuel cycle was analyzed based on the Korean nuclear power plant construction plan up to 2015 and a postulated nuclear demand growth rate of zero after 2015. Second, alternative fuel cycles including the direct use of spent pressurized water reactor fuel in Canada deuterium uranium reactors (DUPIC), a sodium-cooled fast reactor and an accelerator driven system were assessed and the results were compared with those of the once-through fuel cycle. The once-through fuel cycle calculation showed that the nuclear power demand would be 25 GWe and the amount of the spent fuel will be ${\sim}65000$ tons by 2100. The alternative fuel cycle analyses showed that the spent fuel inventory could be reduced by more than 30% and 90% through the DUPIC and fast reactor fuel cycles, respectively, when compared with the once-through fuel cycle. The results of this study indicate that both spent fuel and uranium resources can be effectively managed if alternative reactor systems are timely implemented along with the existing reactors.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.27-39
• /
• 1996

DUPIC핵연료주기로 인해 변화되는 경수로 사용 후 핵연료 물질의 핵종별 농도, 방사능, 붕괴열, 위해지수 및 방사선원항등을 시간의 함수로 그 변화특성을 분석하고, 각 인자별로 크게 영향을 미치는 주요핵종의 거동을 물질농도 측면에서 추적 분석평가하였다. 방사성물질 농도에 있어서 연소도 19,000 MWD/MTU의 사용 후 DUPIC핵연료에 존재하는 악티나이드 양은 연소도 35,000 MWD/MTU의 경수로 사용후 핵연료에 비해 약 2% 감소한 반면 핵분열생성물의 양은 약 20% 증가된 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 사용 후 DUPIC핵연료의 방사능 및 붕괴열은 일반적인 사용후핵연료 특성과는 달리, 방사성물질 농도 변화와 비례하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 사용후 DUPIC핵연료가 갖는 감마 스펙트럼을 경수로핵연료의 경우와 비교해 볼 때, 전체적인 특징은 사용후 DUPIC핵연료의 경우가 $0.01{\sim}0.575MeV$의 낮은 에너지 범위에서는 경수로핵연료 보다 약 $40{\sim}50%$ 낮은 감마선 세기를 보여주고 있으나, 3.5 MeV이상의 높은 에너지 범위에서는 사용후 DUPIC핵연료의 감마선 세기가 휭씬 크게 나타났다. 중성자 선원항은 모두 악티나이드 물질의$({\alpha},\;n)$ 반응 및 자발핵분열에 의해 결정되고 있고, 특히 Cm-244의 자발 핵분열에 의한 중성자선원이 지배적인 것으로 나타났다. 이런 이유 때문에 Cm-244의 농도가 약 3.3배 큰 사용후 DUPIC핵연료의 중성자 선원이 경수로핵연료보다 4배 이상 크게 나타났다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제27권5호
• /
• pp.721-729
• /
• 1995

000년부터 2030년까지의 한국 원전연료주기의 최적전략을 도출하기 위하여 선형계획법을 사용하였다. 최적화를 위한 결정 인자로서는 원전연료 주기비용, 요소비용의 불확실성, 우라늄 소요량을 사용하였다. 위의 인자들을 동시에 고려하기 위하여 각각에 대한 만족도 중 최소값을 최대화하는 퍼지 의사결정기법을 이용하였다. 사용 후 원전 연료에 대한 가능한 선택대안으로는 직접처분, DUPIC, 재처리를 가정하였다. 한국의 원전연료주기 전략은 2010년경부터 재처리를 시작하여 그 처리용량을 2025년경에는 800톤까지 점차로 늘려 나가고, DUPIC 처리를 2025년경부터 시작하는 것이 최적인 것으로 나타났다. 요소비용의 불확실성과 우라늄 소요량을 고려함으로써 단순히 비용만을 고려한 경우보다 총비용은5.4%증가하나, 요소비용 불확실성은 7.1%, 우라늄 소요량은 6. d1％ 감소하는 것으로 나타났다.

• 한국방사성폐기물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국방사성폐기물학회 2004년도 학술논문집
• /
• pp.386-395
• /
• 2004

The Korean fuel cycle scenario has been modeled by using the dynamic analysis method. For once-through fuel cycle model, the nuclear power plant construction plan was considered, and the nuclear demand growth rate from the year 2016 was assumed to be 1%. After setup the once-thorough fuel cycle model, the DUPIC and fast reactor scenarios were modeled to investigate the environmental effect of each fuel cycle. Through the calculation of the amount of spent fuel, and the amounts of plutonium and minor actinides were estimated and compared to those of the once-through fuel cycle. The results of the once-through fuel cycle shows that the demand grows to 64 GWe and the total amount of the spent fuel would be 100 kt in the year 2100, while the total spent fuel can be reduced by 50% when the DUPIC scenario is implemented

• 한국방사성폐기물학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국방사성폐기물학회 2004년도 학술논문집
• /
• pp.133-134
• /
• 2004

DUPIC (Direct Use of spent PWR fuel In CANDU) fuel cycle technology is being developed at Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI). All the DUPIC fuel fabrication processes are remotely conducted in the completely shielded M6 hot-cell located in the Irradiated Material Examination Facility (IMEF) at KAERI. Undesirable products such as spent nuclear fuel powder debris and contaminated wastes are inevitably created during the DUPIC nuclear fuel fabrication processes.(omitted)

• 방사성폐기물학회지
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.125-133
• /
• 2004

최대 선출력 61 ㎾/m 및 평균 연소도 1,770 ㎿d/tU의 조건으로 하나로에서 조사한 DUPIC(Direct Use of Spent PWR Fuel in CANDU Reactors) 핵 연료를 EPMA (Electron Probe Micro Analyzer)를 이용하여 핵분열 생성물을 분석하였다. EPMA의 정확한 분석 방법을 확립하고자, 핵분열생성물 대신 시약을 첨가하여 제조한 모의 DUPIC 핵연료로 EPMA 분석을 수행하였고, 그 결과를 습식 화학 분석의 결과와도 비교하여 평가하였다. 모의 DUPIC 핵연료 중심부의 금속 석출물은 약 1 $\mu\textrm{m}$ 정도의 크기로 관찰되었으며, 이들의 조성은 Mo-53.89 at.%, Ru-37.40 at.% 및 Pd+Rh-8.71 at%이었다. 모의 DUPIC 핵연료 시험에서 정립한 시험방법으로 조사한 DUPIC 핵연료 시편의 금속 석출물 특성을 분석하였다. 핵연료 중앙부에서 관찰된 금속 석출물들의 크기는 2∼2.5 $\mu\textrm{m}$ 정도이었으며, Mo-47.34 at.%, Ru-46 at.%, Pd+Rh-6.65 at.%의 조성임을 확인하였다. 이 실험을 위하여, 특별히 시료의 전도성을 향상시키기 위한 처리를 하였으며, 작은 금속 석출물에 EPMA의 전자빔을 정확히 조사할 수 있는 실험 조건을 제시하였다.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.361-368
• /
• 2003

The economic and environmental friendliness analysis of the nuclear fuel cycle options that can be expected in Korea were performed. Options considered are direct disposal, reprocessing and DUPIC (Direct Use of Spent PWR Fuel In CANDU Reactors). By considering the result of calculation of the annual uranium requirement and nuclear spent fuel generation by analysis of nuclear fuel material flows in the nuclear fuel cycle options, we decided the time of back-end nuclear fuel cycle processes and the volume. Then we can analyze the economic and environmental friendliness by applying the unit cost and unit value of each process, respectively.