• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2018.10a
• /
• pp.939-942
• /
• 2018

최근 LED 조명을 활용한 가시광 통신(VLC: Visible Light Communications)기술이 주목을 받고 있다. 가시광 통신 기술은 Bluetooth, ZigBee 등과 함께 새로운 인터넷 접속 기술로 활용될 수 있으나 전송 용량의 한계 때문에 실제 적용이 힘든 상황이다. 본 논문에서는 이 문제를 해결하기 위해 키-값 데이터베이스 패러다임을 적용한 가시광 통신 기반의 사물인터넷(IoT: Internet of Things) 모델을 제시한다. 제안하는 IoT 환경은 플렛폼 서버, 게이트웨이, VLC 송신기 및 VLC 수신기로 구성된다. IoT 통신을 위한 각 장비의 기능 및 프로토콜 스텍을 설계하고 실험 환경에서 각 장치의 초기화 절차 및 데이터 전송 과정을 검증하였다. 실험결과, 각 장비의 초기 구동 시간을 포함하여 1분 이내에 VLC 기반의 IoT 환경 구축이 가능함을 확인하였다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.322-329
• /
• 2003

Purpose: It is difficult to exactly determine the surface dose and the dose distribution In buildup region of high energy X-rays by using the conventional ion chamber. The aim of this study Is to evaluate the accuracy of widely used dosimetry systems to measure the surface dose and the depth of maximum dose (d$_{max}$). Materials and Methods: We measured the percent depth dose (PDD) from the surface to the d$_{max}$ in either a water phantom or in a solid water phantom using TLD-100 chips, thimble type ion chamber, diode detector, diamond detector and Markus parallel plate ion chamber for 6 MV and 15 MV X-rays, 10$\times$10 cm$^{2}$, at SSD=100cm. We analysed the surface dose and the d$_{max}$. In order to verify the accuracy of the TLD data, we executed the Monte Carlo simulation for 5 MV X-ray beams. Results: The surface doses In 6 MV and IS MV X-rays were 29.31% and 23.36% ior Markus parallel plate ion chamber, 37.17$\%$ and 24.01$\%$ for TLD, 34.87$\%$ and 24.06$\%$ for diamond detector, 38.13$\%$ and 27.8$\%$ for diode detector, and 47.92$\%$ and 35.01$\%$ for thimble type ion chamber, respectively. in Monte Carlo simulation for 6 MV X-rays, the surface dose was 36.22$\%$, which Is similar to the 37.17$\%$ of the TLD measurement data. The d$_{max}$ In 6 WV and 15 MV X-rays was 14$\~$16 mm and 27$\~$29 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the d$_{max}$ among the detectors. Conclusion: There was a remarkable difference in the surface dose among the detectors. The Markus parallel plate chamber showed the most accurate result. The surface dose of the thimble ion chamber was 10$\%$ higher than that of other detectors. We suggest that the correction should be made when the surface dose of the thimble ion chamber Is used for the treatment planning ion the supeficial tumors. All the detectors used In our study showed no difference in the d$_{max}$.