• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.25-33
• /
• 2018

In the globalization and free trade era, the current account deficit problem is a common phenomenon experienced by most countries, both developing and developed countries. Also with managed floating regime of exchange rate, it becomes very important to analyze the dynamics of current account balance which determine the trade. The deficit condition has lasted for four years in Indonesia, as well the deficit value above the value of the surplus that has been experienced during the period 2005-2011. This study is firstly aim to examine the condition of the deficit which happens in the export and import, manufactured goods and oil and gas, whether related to the transaction of goods and services. We try to build a predicted model which near the actual. Then, the focuses examines an exchange rate volatility impact on current account deficit. The model used in this research is a simultaneous model of Indonesia current account deficit from 2005 to 2014. The simulation result indicated that depreciation increase surplus to current account deficit. The decrease of export manufactured goods (non oil and gas) higher than the increase of import. For the oil and gas sector, depreciation of the rupiah against the US dollar results in an increased burden of higher oil and gas imports due to import transactions.

• Asia Pacific Journal of Business Review
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2017

The fundamental goal of the research was to verify if the Twin Deficits Hypothesis holds for the economy of Zambia using time series data from 1980-2014. The current account and budget deficit were employed as key variables. The exchange rate was also used as a transmission mechanism to see how it contributes in the nexus. Cointegration tests confirmed a long run association of the variables. After fitting the VECM model, Granger causality tests confirmed the existence of twin deficits for Zambia. The results supported uni-directional reverse causality. The exchange rate was shown to be more significant in the long run than in the short run. The implosion of the time series as shown by the predicted cointegration equation implies that unless drastic measures are taken to cure the deficits, using the current account as the major target variable, twin deficits will persist for some time. The major policy implication of this research is that given that Zambia is a primary commodity-dependent developing country subsisting largely on copper revenues to sustain the economy, there is a need to move away from "copper addiction," given the recent volatility of earnings of primary commodities (e.g. through diversification of the economy, import substitution, and other strategies).

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.617-626
• /
• 2021

The study examines the existence of twin deficit in two emerging economies (Turkey and Iran) and also investigates the relation of twin deficit with specific macroeconomic indicators such as the GDP, money supply, foreign direct investment, and the interest rate both in short and long-run periods. The twin-deficit concept refers to a situation where the current account deficit and budget deficits exist in the same corresponding period of an economy. This study employs the Bound Test Autoregressive lag distributed (ARDL) model on time-series quarterly secondary data of Turkey and Iran from 1992 to 2019. The stationarity of variables has been ensured through the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test at the level and the first difference. The results reveal the existence of a twin deficit in both the short and long-run periods only in Iran. Its existence could not be observed in the Turkish economy. The findings suggest a positive relationship between twin deficit and GDP, and a negative relationship between twin deficit and FDI and M2. At the same time, the relationship of the twin deficit with interest rate could not be found in the Iranian economy. The findings may be helpful for economic managers of both countries in executing their economic policies.

• Advances in Energy Research
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.97-115
• /
• 2015

Energy holds key to economic growth and prosperity of India. Currently, India has very high-energy import dependence, especially in the case of crude oil (80%) and natural gas (40%). Even coal import has been increasing over the years. Considering India's population growth, emphasis on manufacturing, production, and service industry, energy consumption is bound to increase. More fossil energy consumption means greater dependence on energy import leading to widening trade deficit and current account deficit. Therefore, exploitation of indigenous renewable energy production is necessary. The paper reviews the progress and growth of renewable energy production, distribution, and consumption in India. The paper highlights some of the enablers of renewable energy in India. The authors discuss the opportunities and challenges of increasing share of renewable energy to reduce energy import and address issues of energy security in India. The findings suggest that India is ready for a quantum leap in renewable production by 2022.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제7권7호
• /
• pp.15-25
• /
• 2020

This empirical research aims to identify the relationship between fiscal and financial macroeconomic fundamentals and the volatility of government bonds' borrowing cost in an emerging country - Vietnam. The study covers the period from July 2006 to December 2019 and it is based on a sample of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year government bonds, which represent short-term, medium-term and long-term sovereign bonds in Vietnam, respectively. The Generalized AutoRegressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model and its derivatives such as EGARCH and TGARCH are applied on monthly dataset to examine and suggest a significant effect of fiscal and financial determinants of bond yield volatility. The findings of this study indicate that the variation of Vietnam government bond yields is in compliance with the theories of term structure of interest rate. The results also show that a proportion of the variation in the yields on Vietnam government bonds is attributed to the interest rate itself in the previous period, base rate, foreign interest rate, return of the stock market, fiscal deficit, public debt, and current account balance. Our results could be helpful in the macroeconomic policy formulation for policy-makers and in the investment practice for investors regarding the prediction of bond yield volatility.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권10호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2015

Purpose - This paper aims to investigate whether information asymmetry could explain capital structures in Korean corporations. According to Myers (1984), firms prefer internal funding to external financing due to the costs associated with information asymmetry. When external financing is necessary, firms prefer to issue debt rather than equity by the same reasoning. Since Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999), numerous studies continue to debate the validity of the theory. In this paper, we show how the theory depends on assumptions and incorporated variables. We hope our investigation can provide helpful implications regarding capital structure, information asymmetry, and other firm characteristics. Specifically, our empirical results are complementary to the analysis of Son and Lee's (2015), a recent study that examines the pecking order theory prediction for Korean retail firms. Research design, data, and methodology - We test empirical models that are some variants of model used in Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999). The financial and accounting data are provided by WISEfn for the firms listed on the KOSPI during 1990 to 2013. Bond ratings are supplied by the Korea Investor Service (KIS). We take into account the heterogeneity in debt capacity; a firm's debt capacity is measured by using the method of Lemmon and Zender (2010) based on its bond ratings. Finally, we estimate empirical models suggested by Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999), Frank and Goyal (2003), and Lemmon and Zender (2010). Results - First, we find that Shyam-Sunder and Myers' (1999) prediction fails to explain total debt changes of Korean firms. Second, we find a non-monotonic relationship between total debt changes and financial deficits with respect to debt capacity. This contradicts the prediction of Lemmon and Zender (2010) that argues the pecking order theory survives with a monotonically increasing relationship. Third, we estimate a negative correlation coefficient between financial deficit and current debt changes. The result is the complete opposite of the prediction of Lemmon and Zender (2010). Finally, we also confirm the non-monotonic relationship between non-current debt changes and financial deficits with respect to debt capacity. Yet, the slope of coefficient is smaller than that of total debt change case. Indeed, the results are, to some extent, consistent with the prediction of pecking order theory, if we exclude the mid-debt capacity firms. Conclusions - Our empirical results complementary to the analysis of Son and Lee (2015), a recent study focusing on capital structure in Korean retail firms; their paper suggests interesting topics regarding capital structure, information asymmetry, and other firm characteristics in Korean corporations. Contrary to Son and Lee (2015), our results show that total debt changes and current debt changes are inconsistent with the prediction of Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999). However, similar to Son and Lee (2015), non-current debt changes are consistent with the pecking order prediction, in the case of excluding the mid-level debt capacity firms. This contrast allows us to infer that industry characteristics significantly affect the validity of the pecking order prediction. Further studies are needed to analyze the economics behind this phenomenon, which is beyond the scope of our paper. In addition, the estimation bias potentially matters regarding the firm-level debt capacity calculation. We also reserve this topic for future research.

• 경제분석
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.100-137
• /
• 2019

본 연구에서는 요인활용 다변수 자기회귀모형(FAVAR)과 2000년 이후 한국의 167개 거시변수를 이용하여 정부지출 증가가 거시변수에 미치는 영향 및 각 산업에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 정부지출의 영향을 정부소비지출과 정부투자지출로 나누어 추정한 결과 두 형태의 지출의 효과가 크게 다른 것으로 나타나 이를 고려하지 않는 경우 정확한 정부지출의 효과를 분석하는 것이 어려울 수 있음을 보였다. 특히 정부소비지출은 1년여의 시차를 두고 경기부양효과가 비교적 뚜렷하나, 정부투자지출의 경우 뚜렷한 경기부양효과를 찾아보기 어려웠다. 또한 전통적인 민간소비나 민간투자를 구축하는 채널보다는 수입수요의 증가로 인한 순수출 감소가 재정지출, 특히 정부소비지출의 승수효과를 감소시키는 것으로 보인다. 산업별로는 두 가지 형태의 정부지출증가 모두 토목건설업에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 정부소비지출의 증가는 대부분의 제조업과 서비스업에도 부양효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권9호
• /
• pp.47-57
• /
• 2015

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to investigate the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory (the cost of financing increases with asymmetric information) among Korean retail firms from the perspective of debt capacity. According to the Pecking-order theory, a firm's first preference is to use internal funds for its capital needs, its next preference is the issuance of debt, and its last preference is the issuance of equity; this is due to the information asymmetry problem between existing shareholders and investors. However, prior empirical studies, such as Lemmon and Zender (2010), argue that the entire sample test for the Pecking-order theory could be misleading due to the different levels of debt issuance capability of each of the individual firms; in fact, they confirm that the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory improves after taking into account the differences in debt capacity of the U.S. firms they examined. This paper implements a case study approach among Korean retail firms to examine the relationship between debt capacity and the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory in Korea. Research design, data, and methodology - This study uses the sample of public retail firms on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index (KOSPI) from the time period of 1990 to 2013. We gather related financial and accounting statements from the financial information firm WISEfn. Credit rating information is provided by the Korea Investor Service. We employ the models of Lemmon and Zender (2010) and Son and Kim (2013) to measure a firm's debt capacity. Their logit models use the rating dummy variable as a dependent variable and incorporate other firm characteristics as independent variables to estimate debt capacity. To test the Pecking-order theory, we adopt variants of the financing deficit model of Shyam-Sunder and Myers (1999). In the test of the Pecking-order theory, we consider all of the changes in total debt obligations, current debt obligations, and long-term debt obligations. Results - Our main contribution to the literature is our confirmation of the predicted relationship between debt capacity and the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory among Korean retail firms. The coefficients on financing deficits become greater as a firm's debt capacity improves. This is consistent with the results of Lemmon and Zender (2010). The coefficients on the square of the financing deficits are also negative for the firms in the largest debt capacity group, which is also consistent with the predictions in prior literature. Conclusions - This study takes a case study approach by examining Korean retail firms. We confirm that the Pecking-order theory explains the capital structure of retail firms more appropriately, after taking into account the debt capacity of each firm. This result suggests the importance of debt capacity consideration in the testing of the Pecking-order theory. Our result also implies that there has been a potential underestimation of the explanatory power of the Pecking-order theory in existing studies.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.181-199
• /
• 2019

본 연구의 목적은 1980년 1월부터 2018년 3월까지 한국, 일본, 싱가포르, 홍콩 및 중국의 월별 주식수익률 자료를 사용하여 1997년~1998년 아시아 위기의 변동성 급등이 위기 이후의 주식수익률 변동성에 여전히 영향을 미치는지 여부를 조사하였다. 본 연구는 변동성이 이미 금융위기 이전 수준으로 떨어졌는지 여부를 조사하는데 아시아 금융위기로 인한 비조건부 분산의 가능한 구조적 변화를 설명하기 위해 국면전환 모형인 MRS-GARCH 모형을 사용하였다. 본 연구의 주요 결과는 첫째, 1997년~1998년의 아시아 금융위기기간 이후 일본을 제외하고 각 국가별 주식수익률은 고변동성 국면에서 미약하였고, 2007년과 2008년의 글로벌 금융위기기간을 제외하고 아시아 주식시장은 일부분 진정되었다. 둘째, 아시아의 금융위기로 인한 조건부 변동성의 증가는 대폭 감소되었다. 본 연구는 2018년 3월 현재까지 한국, 일본, 싱가포르, 홍콩 및 중국의 주식시장이 1997년~1998년 아시아 금융위기에 의해 발생된 고변동성 국면에 미약하게 존재하고 있음을 발견하였다. 따라서 1997년과 1998년의 자본자유화, 고인플레이션, 경상수지 악화, 해외 저금리 및 신용성장의 확대 등을 포함한 아시아 위기로 인해 아시아의 주식시장은 완전히 회복(안정)되지 않았으나, 2007년과 2008년의 글로벌 금융위기기간을 제외하고 아시아 주식시장은 대부분 진정되었다고 판단할 수 있었다. 아시아 주식시장의 주식수익률간의 유사성과 국면전환의 유사상관관계를 고려할 때, 다변량 국면전환모형(MRS-GARCH)에서 분석하는 것이 유의한 가치가 존재할 수 있다.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.71-85
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 채권시장과 금리시장의 지표를 이용한 외환시장 환율예측 모델을 만드는데 있어 어떤 인공지능 방법론이 가장 적합한지 밝혀내는데 그 목적이 있다. 채권시장의 대표 상품인 국고채와 통안채는 위험회피 상황이 올 때 대규모로 매도되어지고 그런 경우 환율이 상승하는 모습을 자주 보여주었고, 금리시장에서 통화 스왑 (Cross Currency Swap) 가격은 달러 유동성 문제가 생길 때 주로 하락하였으며, 그 움직임은 환율의 상승에 직간접적인 영향을 미쳐온 점 등을 고려하면, 채권시장과 금리시장에서 거래되는 상품의 가격과 움직임은 외환시장에도 직간접적인 영향을 주고 있으며, 세 시장 사이엔 상호 유기적이고 보완적인 관계가 있다고 볼 수 있다. 지금까지 채권시장, 금리시장, 그리고 외환시장 사이의 관계와 연관성을 밝히는 연구는 있어왔으나, 과거 많은 환율예측 연구들이 주로 GDP, 경상수지 흑자/적자, 인플레이션 등 거시적인 지표를 기반으로 한 연구에 집중되어 왔으며, 채권시장과 금리시장 지표를 기반으로 인공지능을 활용하여 외환시장의 환율을 예측하는 적극적인 연구는 아직 진행되지 않았다. 본 연구는 채권시장 지표와 금리시장 지표를 기반으로, 비선형데이터 분석에 적합한 인공신경망(Artificial Neural Network) 모델과, 선형데이터 분석에 적합한 로지스틱 회귀분석 (Logistic regression), 그리고 비선형/선형데이터 분석에 활용 가능한 의사결정나무 (Decision Tree)를 각각 사용하여 환율예측 모델을 만들고 그 수익률을 비교하여 어떤 모델이 가장 외환시장 환율 예측을 하는데 적합한지 알려준다. 또한, 본 연구는 주식시장, 금리시장, 오일시장, 그리고 외환시장 환율 등 비선형적 시계열 데이터 분석에 많이 사용되어진 인공신경망 모델이 채권시장과 금리시장 지표를 기반으로 한 외환시장 환율예측 모델에 가장 적합한 방법론을 제공하고 있다는 것을 증명한다. 채권시장, 금리시장, 그리고 외환시장 간의 단순한 연관성을 밝히는 것을 넘어, 세 시장 간의 거래 신호를 포착하여 적극적인 상관관계를 밝히고 상호 유기적인 움직임을 증명하는 것은 단순히 외환시장 트레이더 들에게 새로운 트레이딩 모델을 제시하는 것뿐만 아니라 금융시장 전체의 효율성을 증가시키는데 기여할 것이라 기대한다.