• Title/Summary/Keyword: Country's Competitiveness

Search Result 237, Processing Time 0.033 seconds

Global Construction Competitiveness Evaluation in 2016

  • Park, Hwanpyo;Han, Jaegoo
    • International conference on construction engineering and project management
    • /
    • 2017.10a
    • /
    • pp.1-7
    • /
    • 2017
  • Korea's domestic construction market and overseas construction order environment are experiencing a decreasing trend, and this trend is expected to continue. Therefore, domestic construction companies are seeking to enter the global construction market. This study analyzes the global construction market and the global competitiveness for global construction companies and provides the results. To this end, this study has developed a model to evaluate the global construction competitiveness level and to evaluated global construction competitiveness in 2016. The evaluation of global construction competitiveness was analyzed based on the competitiveness of construction infrastructure by country, and the evaluation results of competitiveness of construction companies. These assessments were based on 20 detailed international statistics (ENR, Global Insight, Compass, etc.). The evaluation results are as follows. First, in regard to the comprehensive global construction competitiveness by country, America ranked first among 20 countries, followed by China. European countries like Spain, Germany and the Netherlands ranked third to fifth, respectively. Korea ranked sixth, one rank higher than that of the previous year. America and European countries remain strong. Second, in regard to the comprehensive building infrastructure competitiveness by country, America ranked first followed by Germany. Korea ranked twelfth, which is the same rank as that of the previous year. When it comes to stability in the construction market, China ranked first and Korea eighth. For construction systems, Sweden ranked first and Korea thirteenth, and for infrastructure, Japan ranked first and Korea tenth. Third, according to the construction company's capability evaluation by country, America ranked first followed by China. Korea ranked fourth, two ranks higher than that of the previous year because of its building competitiveness (fifth → fourth) and design competitiveness (eleventh → eighth) which has improved. When it comes to building competitiveness, China ranked first and Korea fourth. For design competitiveness, America ranked first and Korea eighth, and for price competitiveness, India ranked first and Korea seventh. However, Korea is still in the middle of the pack rank among the 20 countries considered when it comes to design competitiveness. It is ranked eleventh for design productivity and thirteenth for foreign sales against the total sales (internationalization). Thus, Korea needs to improve technical power and tap into new markets for improved competitiveness, including increased productivity. To do so, more R&D investment is required.

  • PDF

Competitiveness Evaluation Result of Oversea Construction by country in 2013 (2013년도 국가별 해외건설 경쟁력 평가)

  • Han, Jae-Goo;Park, Hwan-Pyo;Jang, Hyoun-Seung
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2014.05a
    • /
    • pp.6-7
    • /
    • 2014
  • The objective of this study is the competitiveness evaluation of oversea construction by country in order to provide preliminary data of government policy in 2013. In result the United States ranked first, followed by China(2nd), Germany(3rd), France(4th), and Spain(5th), while Korea ranked 7th overall. In particular, Korea's competitiveness in the construction infrastructures by country ranking(8th) was lower than the competency evaluation results of construction companies by country, therein ranking 7th.

  • PDF

Export Performance Analysis of Indonesian Processed Seaweed to The Seven Main Destination Countries from 2010 to 2019

  • ASSHIDIQ, Isna Aissatussiri;AGUSTINA, Neli
    • Asian Journal of Business Environment
    • /
    • v.12 no.3
    • /
    • pp.13-22
    • /
    • 2022
  • Purpose: The research aims to analyze the export performance of processed seaweed, its competitiveness, and determinants on seven main destination countries. Research design, data and methodology: The study uses data of seven main destination countries of Indonesian processed seaweed from 2010 to 2019. For competitiveness analysis, the study uses Revealed Comparative Advantage, Export Product Dynamics, and X-Model of Potential Export Product. Results: The study reveals that the export performance has decreased on all five countries except for Japan and USA. The X-Model analysis shows that the market classification has increased or been stable in every country except for Germany and France. GDP per capita of each destination country and competitiveness index have positive and significance effect while other factors have negative and significance effect. Conclusions: In 2019, Indonesia's processed seaweed market in Japan, United States, and France are on potential market, while Singapore and Italy are on optimistic market. In the future, Indonesia's processed seaweed export can be focused more on countries that have a good market potential. To improve the export volume, GDP per capita of destination country, and competitiveness index of Indonesian processed seaweed should be higher, while export price, economic distance, and real exchange rate should be lower.

Valuing the Country Brand and Implications for Korea (국가브랜드 가치평가와 한국에 대한 시사점)

  • Suh, Yong-Gu;Kim, Yong-Yul
    • THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE & LAW REVIEW
    • /
    • v.28
    • /
    • pp.119-142
    • /
    • 2005
  • This paper shows the method and result of calculating and comparing the country brand value. We define country brand value as one that is built by national competitiveness which contains material and human resources, psychological proximity which is createdfrom direct and indirect indices, and national brand strategy which means strategic efforts intended to enhance country brand value. By applying the model to 16 countries, rank and value of country brands were examined and implications for Korea were derived.

  • PDF

The Effect of R&D on High-Tech Product Export Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence from Panel Data of East Asian Economies

  • Alemu, Aye Mengistu
    • STI Policy Review
    • /
    • v.3 no.1
    • /
    • pp.46-62
    • /
    • 2012
  • This study investigates the effects of the two most important indicators of a nation's state of scientific infrastructure: R&D investment and the number of R&D researchers engaged in high-tech product export competitiveness for a panel of 11 countries/economies from East Asia from 1994 to 2010. A GMM panel estimation method was employed to account for the dynamic effect of trade and to control for un-observed country specific effects that may arise due to an inter-country differences and intra-country dynamics. Accordingly, the empirical results reveal that (once controlled for the influence of per capita income) physical capital and infrastructure, a 1% increase in a country's expenditure on the ratio of R&D to GDP may increase high-tech product export performance by approximately $397 million per year. Other factors constant, a 1% increase in the number of R&D researchers is expected to increase the ability to export high-tech products by approximately $67 million. The East Asian development experience demonstrates how latecomers can follow systematic industrialization and join the handful of economies that have come a long way toward closing the knowledge gap with the global technological leaders. However, this does not mean that the policy approaches and overall commitments pursued by each East Asian economy in relation to R&D investment and acquisition of an adequate pool of researchers, and their ultimate achievements in high-tech product export competitiveness were uniform. As a result, there is still a significant variation among countries/economies in terms of performance. This study recommended a number of potential tools and policy instruments that may assist policy makers to foster R&D as an engine to enhance the high-tech product export competitiveness.

Application of IPS model of city competitiveness to Korean cities, and strategies to enhance Chuncheon city's competitiveness (IPS 도시경쟁력 평가 모델과 한국 도시의 경쟁력 평가 결과, 그리고 춘천시의 경쟁력 향상 전략)

  • Cho, Dongsung;Im, Minyoung
    • Journal of Leisure Studies
    • /
    • v.6 no.3
    • /
    • pp.39-56
    • /
    • 2009
  • With the main player of international competition being changed from country to region/city, city competitiveness is emerging as driving forces of industrial and national competitiveness and organizations formed on a city level are regarded as the main unit of competition among nations. This paper's goal is to research upon the city competitiveness with an emphasis on the analytical tool applying IPS Model of city competitiveness to 75 Korean cities and to map out the strategies to enhance the Chuncheon city's competitiveness based on the results of the evaluation on Chuncheon city's current and future competitiveness with focus on the impact of the city's hosting World Leisure Congress and World Leisure Games in 2010. By discussing city's future competitiveness as well as its current strength at the same time, the more comprehensive perspective required in reinforcing city competitiveness is proposed in this paper and issues related to a city's context and policy can be evaluated and their solutions can be sought after. The study can also contribute to the establishment of city's development policies and detect sustainable growth power for individual cities.

IT Industry Competitiveness and e-Readiness Level of Korean Economy (한국의 IT 산업 경쟁력과 IT 활용 수준 분석)

  • Park, Kyung-Hye
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.7 no.2
    • /
    • pp.35-41
    • /
    • 2009
  • The information technology, in the digital economy era, does a very important role not only for the country's administrative management innovation but also for the business and for the everyday life. Specifically, the e-business for the company or organization is defined as "using the Internet and IT, rescheduling of business process management activities to increase productivity and efficiency and to create new business opportunities." Thanks to the Korea's recent efforts, overall level of informatization and digitalization is able to receive high praise. But the e-business readiness (e-readiness) level is still expected a lot of room for improvement. In this paper, I try to analyze the informatization level of Korea's by the EIU's e-business readiness index and IT industry competitiveness index, to prepare a full-scale e-business era of global competitiveness through any preparation that could do to improve the situation from the analysis of statistical data.

  • PDF

Global IT Industry Competitiveness and e-Readiness of Korean Economy (한국의 글로벌 IT산업 경쟁력과 이비즈니스 준비도)

  • Park, Kyung-Hye
    • Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
    • /
    • 2008.10b
    • /
    • pp.48-53
    • /
    • 2008
  • The information technology, in the digital economy era, does a very important role not only for the country's administrative management innovation but also for the business and for the everyday life. Specifically, the e-business for the company or organization is defined as "using the Internet and IT, rescheduling of business process management activities to increase productivity and efficiency and to create new business opportunities." Thanks to the Korea's recent efforts, overall level of informatization and digitalization is able to receive high praise. But the e-business readiness (e-readiness) level is still expected a lot of room for improvement. In this paper, I try to analyze the informatization level of Korea's by the EIU's e-business readiness index and IT industry competitiveness index, to prepare a full-scale e-business era of global competitiveness through any preparation that could do to improve the situation from the analysis of statistical data.

  • PDF

Analysis of Competitiveness in Steel Distribution Industry between China and Japan

  • Lee, Jae-Sung
    • Journal of Distribution Science
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.31-38
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose - This paper reviews the change of steel export-import structure between Japan and China by the courtesy of international business reference index and stress to analyze comparative advantage under the circumstance of time-series evaluating database by 3 indexes. Research design, data, methodology - Per economic phase, both China-Japan have mutually a complementary base. Under this kind of view point, the reason why to conduct this study is to realize how this 2 country's trade competitiveness should be improved and strengthened. Results - Under this research data and analysis outcomes, bilateral intra-economy's potential supplementation is enormous. Additionally, expected benefits from here are so sufficiently assured as we compare them with any other regional economic integrated society. Conclusions - When we review our economic point of view, Northeast economic cooperations between China and Japan can provide a chance for industrial technological cooperations not only in steel business but also in other business areas. Come to think of the circumstance to accelerate competitions between 2 country's industries past time and acknowledge concrete resource supplier including expanding export market and diversification.

A Comparative Study on Construction Productivity Trends as Analyzed by Various Measures - South Korea, the U.S., the U.K., and Japan (1995-2015) - (측정지표에 따른 건설생산성 비교 - 한국, 미국, 영국, 일본(1995-2015) -)

  • Lee, Chijoo;Lee, Ghang;Won, Jongsung
    • Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction
    • /
    • v.35 no.4
    • /
    • pp.175-184
    • /
    • 2019
  • To improve productivity in the architecture, construction and engineering industry, it is critical to understand both current and historic trends in construction productivity. This study analyzes and compares construction productivity trends of South Korea, the U.S., the U.K., and Japan 1995 to 2015 using the following three measures: construction labor productivity, construction duration per floor, and construction duration per 1,000 m2 floor area. As the results, the international competitiveness of each country varied according to which measures were used to analyze them. Among the four countries, the construction labor productivity of the U.S. was the highest, followed by that of South Korea. South Korea also had the second highest productivity growth rate, following that of Japan. On the other hand, when analyzed from the perspective of construction duration, the construction productivity in South Korea appeared relatively lower than those of other countries. There were differences in the location of construction competitiveness of each country analyzed by various measures. Therefore, to accurately diagnose and improve the construction competitiveness in South Korea, strategies based on various measures are need to established simultaneously.