• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권16호
• /
• pp.7331-7335
• /
• 2015

Background: Concurrent chemoradiation with three weekly high dose cisplatin is the non-surgical standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers. Although this treatment regime is efficacious, it has high acute toxicity, which leads not only to increased treatment cost, but also to increased overall treatment time. Hence, the current study was undertaken to evaluate the acute toxicity and tumor response in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation using $40mg/m^2$ weekly cisplatin, which has been our institutional practice. Materials and Methods: This single institution retrospective study included data for 287 head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation from 2012 to 2014. Results: The mean age of the patients was 48.8 years. The most common site of involvement was oral cavity. Most of the study patients presented with advanced stage disease. The mean overall treatment time was 56.9 days. Some 67.2% had overall complete response to treatment as documented till 90 days from the start of treatment. According to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria, mucositis was seen in 95.1% of the patients. Dermatitis and emesis were observed in 81.9% and 98.6%, respectively. Regarding haematological toxicity, 48.8% and 29.6% suffered from anaemia and leukopenia, respectively, during treatment. Acute kidney injury was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), and was found in 18.8% of the patients. Conclusions: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin is an effective treatment regime for head and neck cancers with reasonable toxicity which can be used in developing countries, where cost of treatment is so important.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.214-217
• /
• 2011

To avoid improper tumor volume contouring in radiation therapy (RT) and other invasive procedures, we report a case of uterine adenomyosis showing increased $^{18}F$-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) mimicking malignant tumor in a 44-year-old woman during concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for uterine cervical cancer. The adenomyosis was not associated with her menstrual cycle or with normal endometrium uptake, and it resolved one month after completion of RT. This case indicates that uterine adenomyosis in a premenopausal woman may show false positive uptake of $^{18}FDG$-PET/CT associated with CCRT.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권16호
• /
• pp.7309-7313
• /
• 2015

Background: The organ preservation approach of choice for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers is concurrent chemoradiation with three weekly high doses of cisplatin. Although this is an efficacious treatment policy, it has high acute systemic and mucosal toxicities, which lead to frequent treatment breaks and increased overall treatment time. Hence, the current study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation using 40 mg/m2 weekly cisplatin. Materials and Methods: This is a single institutional retrospective study including the data of 266 locally advanced head and neck cancer patients who were treated with concurrent chemoradiation using 40 mg/m2 weekly cisplatin from January 2012 to January 2014. A p-value of < 0.05 was taken to be significant statistically for all purposes in the study. Results: The mean age of the study patients was 48.8 years. Some 36.1% of the patients had oral cavity primary tumors. The mean overall treatment time was 57.2 days. With a mean follow up of 15.2 months for all study patients and 17.5 months for survivors, 3 year local control, locoregional control and disease free survival were seen in 62.8%, 42.8% and 42.1% of the study patients. Primary tumor site, nodal stage of disease, AJCC stage of the disease and number of cycles of weekly cisplatin demonstrated statistically significant correlations with 3 year local control, locoregional control and disease free survival. Conclusions: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with moderate dose weekly cisplatin is an efficacious treatment regime for locally advanced head and neck cancers with tolerable toxicity which can be used in developing countries with limited resources.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제14권9호
• /
• pp.5127-5131
• /
• 2013

Background: 5-fluoro-uracil (FU) is a common agent in postoperative chemoradiation in gastric adenocarcinoma. However, FU is not well tolerated in a significant proportion of patients. Capecitabine (CA) is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate which is preferentially converted to active 5-FU and is one of the agents used instead of FU in such cases. We compared the toxicity, local and distant control and survival rates with FU or oral CA during the course of concurrent radiotherapy to assess the role of CA used instead of FU. Materials and Methods: We conducted an analysis of survival, disease control and toxicity data in 46 patients treated with postoperative chemoradiation following total or subtotal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma with either FU or CA between January 2008 and December 2012. Results: Median follow-up was 19 months (range: 3-59), median survival time was 23 ({\pm}6.08) months and 1-3 years overall survival (OS) rates were 64.9-39% for all patients. Compared with the CA regimen, the incidence of treatment interruption was higher with FU (p=0.023), but no significant differences were seen in local control (p=0.510), distant recurrences (p=0.721) and survival rates (p=0.866) among patients. Conclusions: Concurrent CA with radiotherapy seems to be a more tolerable and an equally effective regimen for the postoperative treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma when compared to FU.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권16호
• /
• pp.7315-7319
• /
• 2015

Objectives: The study analyzed and compared the long term outcome in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative and postoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 105 patients with stage T3-T4 or regional lymph node positive adenocarcinoma of rectum treated with preoperative or postoperative CCRT at Ramathibodi Hospital during 2005 to 2010 was performed. The results of treatment were reported with 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year locoregional recurrence free survival (LRFS), and toxicity according to preoperative versus postoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) groups. Results: Among 105 patients, 34 (32%) were treated with preoperative CCRT and 71 (68%) with postoperative CCRT. At the median follow-up time of 50.5 months (range 2-114 months), five-year OS and LRFS of all patients were 87% and 91.6%, respectively. The study found no difference in 5-year OS (81.7% vs 89.2 %) or LRFS (83.4% vs 95.1%) between preoperative versus postoperative CCRT. Seven cases of loco-regional recurrence were diagnosed, 4 (11.8%) after preoperative CCRT and 3 (4.2%) after postoperative CCRT. The recurrent sites were anastomosis in all patients. There was no significant factor associated with outcome after univariate and multivariate testing. Grade 3 or 4 acute and late complications were low in both preoperative and postoperative CCRT groups. Conclusions: Locally advanced rectum cancer patients experience good results with surgery and adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.233-241
• /
• 1995

Purpose : To analyse clinical outcome and prognostic factors according to treatment modality, this paper report our experience of retrospective study of patients with esophageal cancer Materials and Methods : One hundred and ten patients with primary esophageal cancer who were treated in Presbyterian Medical Center from May 1985 to December 1992. We analysed these patients retrospectively with median follow up time of 28 months, one hundred and four patients($95{\%}$) were followed up from 15 to 69 months. In methods, twenty-eight patients were treated with median radiation dose irradiated 54.3Gy only. Fifty-six patients were treated with combined chemoradiotherapy. Sixteen cases of these patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation and the other patients(forty cases) were treated sequential chemoradiotherapy. In concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, patients received 5-FU continuous IV infusion for 4 days. Cisplatin IV bolus. and concurrent esophageal irradiation to 30 Gy. After that patients received 5-FU continuous IV, Cisplatin bolus injection and Mitomycin-C bolus IV, Bleomycin continuous IV, and irradiation to 20 Gy. In sequential chemoradiotherapy group, the chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU 1,000mg/$m^2$ administered as a continuous 24 hour intravenous infusion during five days and Cisplatin 80-100mg/$m^2$ bolus injected, or Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Cisplatin, Methotrexate were used of 1 or 2 cycles. After preoperative concurrentm chemoradiation twenty-six patients underwent radical esophagectomy. Results : Ninety-three patients could be examined for response assessment, By treatment modality, response rates were $85.1{\%}$ for radiation alone group and $86.3{\%}$ for combined chemoradiation group. But in operation group, after one cycle of concurrent chemoradiation treatment, response rate was $61.9{\%}$. The pathologic complete response were $15.4{\%}$ in operation group. Overall median survival was II months and actuarial 5-year survival rate was $8{\%}$. The median survival interval was 6 months for radiation alone group, 11 months for combined chemoradiation group and 19 months for operation group. And also median survival was 19 months for complete responder group that 8 months for noncomplete responder group. In univariative analysis, statistically significant prognostic factors were tumor size, clinical stage, tumor response, and operation. In multivariative analysis, significantly better survival was associated with clinical stage, tumor response, radiation dose, and operation. Conclusion : Compared with radiotherapy alone, combined multimodality may improve the median survival in patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus and toxicity is acceptable.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.351-357
• /
• 2004

연구배경 : 최근 항암화학요법과 방사선요법의 병용치료는 국소진행성 비소세포폐암 치료에 있어서 표준치료방법으로 자리잡고 있으며 동시요법이 순차적요법에 비해 치료반응율에 있어서 우수하다고 알려져 있다. 본 연구는 비소세포폐암 치료에 있어서 우수한 효과를 보이고 방사선감작 효과가 있다고 알려진 paclitaxel (60 $mg/m^2$) 매주투여와 동시 방사선요법의 III병기 비소세포폐암 환자에서의 치료효과와 독성을 조사하기 위하여 시행하였다. 방 법 : III병기 비소세포폐암 환자 22명 (IIIA:6, IIIB:16)을 대상으로 paclitaxel (60 $mg/m^2$)을 제 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36일째에 매주 투여하고 동시에 54 Gy의 방사선 치료를 시행하였다. 초기 동시치료를 종료하고 paclitaxel (175 $mg/m^2$)/cisplatin (75 $mg/m^2$) 혹은 paclitaxel (175 $mg/m^2$)/carboplatin (6AUC) regimen 으로 보강화학요법을 3주 간격으로 2주기 시행하였다. 결 과 : 전반적 치료반응율은 81.8% (18/22)로서 완전관해가 9.1% (2/22), 부분관해가 72.7% (16/22)의 결과를 보였다. 두명의 (9.1%) 환자가 치료종료 후 방사선폐장염의 합병증으로 사망하였다. 3도 이상의 독성 반응은 방사선폐장염 (22.7%), 식도염 (22.7%), 신경병증 (13.6%), 및 백혈구감소증 (13.6%)의 결과를 나타내었다. 중앙생존기간은 15개월이었고 1년 및 2년 생존율은 각각 63.6%와 31.8%였다. 결 론 : 국소진행성 비소세포폐암 환자에서 paclitaxel 매주 투여에 의한 동시 방사선요법은 우수한 종양반응율을 나타내지만 치명적인 방사선폐장염의 발생 위험이 있으므로 향후 보완연구가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.68-71
• /
• 2014

한 달 동안의 점점 커지는 복부의 종괴를 주소로 방문한 57세 남자 환자에서 대장-십이지장루를 동반한 대장암을 진단하였으며, 이에 대해 수술 전 동시 항암방사선 치료를 시행하여 수술 범위를 줄일 수 있었던 좋은 예였다. 국소적으로 진행된 대장암 환자에서 본 증례와 같은 합병증으로 수술의 범위가 커질 가능성이 있다면, 보존적 치료 및 수술 전 동시 항암방사선 치료를 시행하여 수술 범위를 좁히는 것이 환자의 치료 경과에 도움이 될 것으로 생각된다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권16호
• /
• pp.7025-7029
• /
• 2015

Background: The optimal sequence and extent of multimodality therapy remains to be defined for extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma because of its rarity. The purpose of our study was to assess the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation/radiation in patients with extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: Four consecutively diagnosed patients were included in this study. The primary tumor site was oropharynx in three patients and esophagus in one. The patients with the limited disease were treated with chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation (n=2) or radiotherapy (n=1). The patient with the extensive disease with the primary site in vallecula was treated with chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy to the metastatic site. Results: The median follow-up was 22.5 months (range, 8-24 months). Three patients with the limited disease (base of tongue, n=2; esophagus, n=1) were in complete remission. The patient with the extensive disease died of loco-regional tumor progression at 8 months from the time of diagnosis. Conclusions: The combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the preferred therapeutic approach for patients with extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation or radiation provides a good loco-regional control in patients with limited disease.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.328-333
• /
• 2002

목적 : 절제 불가능한 췌장암은 예후가 불량하여 효과적인 치료법의 개발이 요망되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 Gemcitabine 또는 Paclitaxel과 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)을 이용한 동시항암화학방사선요법을 시행하여 치료효과를 분석하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 임상적으로 혹은 개복수술 소견 상 절제 불가능한 췌장암으로 진단받은 환자를 대상으로 Gemcitabine 또는 Paclitaxel과 5-FU을 이용한 동시항암화학방사선요법을 시행하였다. 방사선 치료는 원발병소와 주위 림프절을 포함하여 5주 동안 45 Gy를 조사하였다. 이 기간동안 Gemcitabine $1,000\;mg/m^2$ 또는 Paclitaxel $50\;mg/m^2$의 매주 1회 주사 및 5-FU의 매일 경구 투여를 시행하였다. 추적관찰기간은 6개월에서 36개월이었으며, 생존율은 Kaplan-Meier법을 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과 : 1999년 1월부터 2001년 11월까지 본 치료법이 시행된 경우는 54예였으며, 이중 계획된 치료를 종료한 42예를 분석하였다. 남녀 비는 30 : 12였고 중앙 연령은 60세였다. 총 54예 중 치료 중 원격전이나 암종증(carcinomatosis) 등으로의 진행 6명$(50\%)$, 시작시 불량한 전신수행 상태 4명$(33.3\%)$, 병변과 무관한 병발질환 1명$(8.3\%)$, 치료 거부 1명$(8.3\%)$ 등으로 총 12예에서 치료가 중단되었다. 42명의 환자 중 40예에서 반응 평가가 가능하였으며 완전 관해 1예, 부분 관해 24예로 관해율은 $59\%$로 나타났다. 중앙 생존값은 12개월, 1년 생존율은 $46.7\%$, 2년 생존율은 $17.0\%$였다. Grade III 이상의 치료독성으로는 혈액학적 독성이 8예$(19\%)$, 오심, 구토 등의 비혈액학적 독성이 9예$(20\%)$이었다. 이중 2명은 치료독성에 의한 상부 소화기 출혈로 사망하였다. 결론 : 절제 불가능한 췌장암에서 Gemcitabine 또는 Paclitaxel를 이용한 동시항암화학방사선요법은 관해율과 생존율에 있어서 효과적인 치료로 생각된다. 그러나 독성감소를 위한 연구가 또한 병행되어야 할 것으로 생각된다.