• 제목/요약/키워드: Concentration of lidocaine hydrochloride

검색결과 6건 처리시간 0.021초

유화제(乳化劑)와 Lidocaine.HCl의 병용효과에 관(關)한 연구(硏究)( I ) (Combined Effect of Lidocaine Hydrochloride with Some Surfactants ( I ))

  • 김용현;염철호;최준식
    • Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation
    • /
    • 제12권2호
    • /
    • pp.31-36
    • /
    • 1982
  • The effect of some surfactants, such as tween 40, tween 80, span 80, and triethanolamine, on the absorption of lidocaine was studied using goldfish as a model of absorption kinetics. This model was believed that reciprocal overturn time and death time were the occurrence of biological effect versus drug absorption. The results were as follows; The threshold concentration of lidocaine was significantly reduced by the surfactants. Overturn time and death time of goldfish in the lidocaine solution were reduced by such surfactants as tween 40, tween 80, span 80 and triethanolamine, and more reduced with increasing concentration of surfactants except tween 40 and tween 80. The plots of reciprocal death time versus lidocaine concentration were linear relationship with a positive concentration intercept such as minimum effective concentration (0.2-0.8%). As results it is believed that these surfactants may form complexes with lidocaine or affect the goldfish membrane to make more permeable to lidocaine, which is adsorbed more rapidly.

  • PDF

The efficacy of an elevated concentration of lidocaine HCl in impacted lower third molar surgery

  • Ping, Bushara;Kiattavorncharoen, Sirichai;Saengsirinavin, Chavengkiat;Im, Puthavy;Durward, Callum;Wongsirichat, Natthamet
    • Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
    • /
    • 제15권2호
    • /
    • pp.69-76
    • /
    • 2015
  • Background: There have been few studies on the effect of an elevated concentration of lidocaine hydrochloride in the surgical removal of an impacted lower third molar. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of 4% lidocaine along with 1:100,000 epinephrine compared to 2% lidocaine along with 1:100,000 epinephrine as inferior alveolar nerve block for the removal of an impacted lower third molar. Methods: This single-blind study involved 31 healthy patients (mean age: 23 y; range: 19-33 y) with symmetrically impacted lower third molars as observed on panoramic radiographs. Volunteers required 2 surgical interventions by the same surgeon with a 3-week washout period. The volunteers were assigned either 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine or 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine as local anesthetic during each operation. Results: We recorded the time of administration, need for additional anesthetic administration, total volume of anesthetic used. We found that the patient's preference for either of the 2 types of local anesthetic were significantly different (P < 0.05). However, the extent of pulpal anesthesia, surgical duration, and duration of soft tissue anesthesia were not significantly different. Conclusions: Our study suggested that inferior alveolar nerve block using 4% lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine as a local anesthetic was clinically more effective than that using 2% lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine; the surgical duration was not affected, and no clinically adverse effects were encountered.

ALLERGIC REACTION AFTER INJECTING A LOCAL ANESTHETIC DURING DENTAL TREATMENT: A CASE REPORT

  • ;김수관
    • Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    • /
    • 제32권3호
    • /
    • pp.251-255
    • /
    • 2010
  • A local anesthetic agent which is most commonly used for outpatients is lidocaine hydrochloride that contains epinephrine, which is for vasoconstriction in 1:100,000 concentration. This agent is known as a safe local anesthetic agent and has been used widely for topical use or injections. However, the allergic reaction that we will report in this case occurred when common local anesthesia was done intraorally, and the patient complained of hyperventilation, tachycardia, abdominal pain and unintentional tears. We experienced an allergic reaction after injecting the lidocaine hydrochloride and therefore report the case to suggest that local anesthesia should be always carried out very carefully.

Hemodynamic changes associated with a novel concentration of lidocaine HCl for impacted lower third molar surgery

  • Ping, Bushara;Kiattavorncharoen, Sirichai;Durward, Callum;Im, Puthavy;Saengsirinavin, Chavengkiat;Wongsirichat, Natthamet
    • Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.121-128
    • /
    • 2015
  • Background: The authors studied the hemodynamic effect influent by using the novel high concentration of lidocaine HCl for surgical removal impacted lower third molar. The objective of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic change when using different concentrations of lidocaine in impacted lower third molar surgery. Methods: Split mouth single blind study comprising 31 healthy patients with a mean age of 23 years (range 19-33 years). Subjects had symmetrically impacted lower third molars as observed on panoramic radiograph. Each participant required 2 surgical interventions by the same surgeon with a 3-week washout period washout period. The participants were alternately assigned one of two types of local anesthetic (left or right) for the first surgery, then the other type of anesthetic for the second surgery. One solution was 4% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and the other was 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A standard IANB with 1.8 ml volume was used. Any requirement for additional anesthetic and patient pain intra-operation was recorded. Post-operatively, patient was instructed to fill in the patient report form for any adverse effect and local anesthetic preference in terms of intra-operative pain. This form was collected at the seven day follow up appointment. Results: In the 4% lidocaine group, the heart rate increased during the first minute post-injection (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant change in arterial blood pressure during the operation. In the 2% lidocaine group, there was a significant increase in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in the first minute following injection for every procedure. When the hemodynamic changes in each group were compared, the 4% lidocaine group had significantly lower arterial blood pressure compared to the 2% lidocaine group following injection. Post-operatively, no adverse effects were observed by the operator and patient in either local anesthetic group. Patients reported less pain intra-operation in the 4% lidocaine group compared with the 2% lidocaine group (P < .05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that a 4% concentration of lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine has better clinical efficacy than 2% lidocaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used for surgical extraction of lower third molars. Neither drug had any clinical adverse effects.

막유화법에 의한 생분해성 Polycaprolactone 마이크로캡슐의 제조와 약물방출 특성 (Preparation of Polycaprolactone Microcapsules by Membrane Emulsification Method and Its Drug Release Properties)

  • 염경호;윤태호;김공수;조석형
    • 멤브레인
    • /
    • 제17권1호
    • /
    • pp.67-79
    • /
    • 2007
  • SPG (Shirasu porous glass) 관형 막이 설치된 회분식 막유화 장치를 사용하여 이온성 약물이 담지된 단분산 polycaprolactone (PCL) 마이크로캡슐을 제조하기 위한 막유화 공정변수의 최적조건을 결정하였다. 마이크로캡슐에 담지된 이온성 약물로는 양이온성인 lidocaine-hydrochloride, 중성인 sodium salicylate와 음이온성인 4-acetaminophen의 3가지를 사용하였으며, PCL 마이크로캡슐로부터 이들 모델약물의 방출거동을 검토하였다. 캡슐제조에 사용된 PCL의 농도와 분자량, 막간 압력차, 분산상과 연속상에 첨가시킨 유화제의 농도, 연속상의 교반속도가 막유화법으로 제조된 PCL 캡슐의 크기와 크기분포에 미치는 영향을 검토하였다. 이들 공정변수의 조절을 통해 평균 크기 약 $5\;{\mu}m$의 균일한 마이크로캡슐을 제조할 수 있었다. 약물 방출실험 결과 산성조건에서 알칼리조건으로 방출환경이 변화됨에 따라 약물 방출속도가 증가하였다.

Temporary blindness caused by corneal edema after a local anesthetic injection in the eyebrow region: a case report

  • Hong, Jung Hyun;Jo, Yeon Ji;Kang, Taewoo;Park, Heeseung;Kim, Kyoung Eun;Lee, Jae Woo;Bae, Seong Hwan
    • 대한두개안면성형외과학회지
    • /
    • 제23권4호
    • /
    • pp.183-186
    • /
    • 2022
  • Plastic surgery around the eyes is usually performed under local anesthesia, using a mixture of lidocaine and epinephrine. Blindness is a rare but devastating complication after the injection of local anesthesia in this region. Most cases reported to date have been caused by occlusion of the ophthalmic artery or central retinal artery. In this case report, however, we present a highly unusual case of blindness caused by corneal edema after a local anesthetic injection. A patient visited the emergency room with a laceration on the eyebrow, and local anesthesia was injected before suturing. Immediately after the injection, severe corneal edema developed, making it impossible to observe the structures in the anterior chamber in detail or check the light reflex and visual acuity of the naked eye. An antibiotic (moxifloxacin hydrochloride) and high-concentration steroid eyedrops were promptly applied. High-concentration steroids were also administered orally. On day 13 post-injury, the visual acuity of the naked eye improved to 1.0, and no recurrence of corneal lesions was observed. Although the cause of corneal edema after the local injection could not be conclusively identified, we hope that this report will help raise clinicians' awareness of this complication and appropriate treatment methods.